Immediate Postintervention Outcomes from a Randomized Trial that Sought to Enhance Access to Live Donor Kidney Transplant for Black and African Americans.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Progress in Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1177/15269248241304794
Kimberly Jacob Arriola, D'Jata Barrett, Stephen Pastan, Jennie Perryman, Derek DuBay, Courtney Tresslar, Sara Useche De Abreu, Mengyu Di, Larissa Teunis, Miranda Montoya, Tatenda Mangurenje, Rachel E Patzer
{"title":"Immediate Postintervention Outcomes from a Randomized Trial that Sought to Enhance Access to Live Donor Kidney Transplant for Black and African Americans.","authors":"Kimberly Jacob Arriola, D'Jata Barrett, Stephen Pastan, Jennie Perryman, Derek DuBay, Courtney Tresslar, Sara Useche De Abreu, Mengyu Di, Larissa Teunis, Miranda Montoya, Tatenda Mangurenje, Rachel E Patzer","doi":"10.1177/15269248241304794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Eliminating racial inequities in access to kidney transplantation requires multilevel interventions that target both patients and health systems.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine whether adding culturally sensitive, web-based patient education to a transplant center-level intervention was associated with increased knowledge, motivation to pursue living donor kidney transplant, and confidence in the behavioral skills to discuss living donation among Black/African American patients with end-stage kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A total of 411 transplant candidates were randomized to intervention (N = 222) or control groups (N = 189) and completed measures at baseline and immediate follow-up during the transplant evaluation visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated no significant change in knowledge across time or study condition. At immediate follow-up, participants of both study conditions exhibited a significantly higher motivation to pursue living donation (t = 3.066, <i>P</i> < .01) versus at baseline. Both study conditions demonstrated increased confidence in the behavioral skills to discuss living donation over time (t = 3.580, <i>P</i> < .001). Process evaluation findings demonstrated limited engagement with the online video content across both conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest that the intervention did not perform better than control but raised important considerations for the delivery of transplant education targeting Black/African American patients in a busy clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"15269248241304794"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248241304794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Eliminating racial inequities in access to kidney transplantation requires multilevel interventions that target both patients and health systems.

Research question: The aim of this study was to determine whether adding culturally sensitive, web-based patient education to a transplant center-level intervention was associated with increased knowledge, motivation to pursue living donor kidney transplant, and confidence in the behavioral skills to discuss living donation among Black/African American patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Design: A total of 411 transplant candidates were randomized to intervention (N = 222) or control groups (N = 189) and completed measures at baseline and immediate follow-up during the transplant evaluation visit.

Results: Results indicated no significant change in knowledge across time or study condition. At immediate follow-up, participants of both study conditions exhibited a significantly higher motivation to pursue living donation (t = 3.066, P < .01) versus at baseline. Both study conditions demonstrated increased confidence in the behavioral skills to discuss living donation over time (t = 3.580, P < .001). Process evaluation findings demonstrated limited engagement with the online video content across both conditions.

Conclusion: Results suggest that the intervention did not perform better than control but raised important considerations for the delivery of transplant education targeting Black/African American patients in a busy clinical setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Anxiety Measurement Scales in Pediatric Organ Transplantation Patients. Immediate Postintervention Outcomes from a Randomized Trial that Sought to Enhance Access to Live Donor Kidney Transplant for Black and African Americans. Empowering the Voice of Patients, Families, and Caregivers Through Participation in Organ Donation and Transplantation Conferences. A Journey From Patient and Physician to Entrepreneur and Advocate in Transplantation. Organ Donation Changed My Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1