首页 > 最新文献

Progress in Transplantation最新文献

英文 中文
A Case Study of Discrepancy in Hospital Versus Home Device Readings of CardioMEMs Monitoring. 医院与家庭设备CardioMEMs监测读数差异的个案研究
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251383953
Ibrahim Zaky, Audrey Cohen, Edward Betterton
{"title":"A Case Study of Discrepancy in Hospital Versus Home Device Readings of CardioMEMs Monitoring.","authors":"Ibrahim Zaky, Audrey Cohen, Edward Betterton","doi":"10.1177/15269248251383953","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251383953","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"229-231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145225841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Survey Study of Liver Donors' Information Needs on Recipient Outcomes in High-Risk Donation Scenarios. 高危捐献情况下肝供者对受者结局信息需求的调查研究
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-17 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251383952
Adrienne Chen, Allison Carroll, Elisa J Gordon, Josh Levitsky

IntroductionLiving donor liver transplantation is expanding worldwide as a treatment for end-stage liver disease, especially in high-risk recipients. No standardized information is provided to donors during the informed consent process. Consequently, variable information may be provided to the donor about the recipient, which may undermine donor-informed consent.Research QuestionsIn high-risk donation scenarios, it is uncertain whether information disclosed about the recipient is sufficient for donor-informed decision-making. Would information about the recipient's potential adverse and beneficial short- and long-term outcomes help donors make a decision about donating?DesignAn online survey was conducted of previous living liver donors' likelihood of donating and information needs regarding their recipients in 3 hypothetical high-risk clinical scenarios: alcoholic liver disease (ALD) with high relapse risk, acute liver failure (ALF), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with high recurrence risk.ResultsA total of 98 living liver donors participated in this study. Most living liver donors expressed willingness to donate to a patient in each scenario: ALD (51%), ALF (56%), and HCC (85%). Most living liver donors (56% to 93%) reported desiring information about the recipient's diagnosis, clinical condition, and projected outcomes in their donation decision-making process. Most living liver donors (82%) considered an acute consultation service to be useful in deciding whether to donate to a patient with ALF.ConclusionsThe findings suggested that transplant programs should incorporate recipient health information with recipient consent into the informed consent process and offer consultation services to support living liver donors' decision-making.

活体供肝移植作为终末期肝病的一种治疗方法正在全球范围内扩大,特别是在高危受体中。在知情同意过程中,没有向捐助者提供标准化信息。因此,可能会向捐赠者提供关于接受者的可变信息,这可能会破坏捐赠者知情同意。研究问题:在高风险捐赠情况下,不确定披露的接受者信息是否足以让捐赠者做出知情的决策。关于接受者潜在的不利和有益的短期和长期结果的信息是否有助于捐赠者做出捐赠的决定?设计一项在线调查,调查了在3种假设的高风险临床情况下,既往活体肝脏供者的捐赠可能性和供者的信息需求:高复发风险的酒精性肝病(ALD)、急性肝衰竭(ALF)和高复发风险的肝细胞癌(HCC)。结果共98例活体肝供体参与本研究。大多数活体肝脏供者表示愿意在每种情况下捐献给患者:ALD (51%), ALF(56%)和HCC(85%)。大多数活体肝脏供者(56%至93%)报告说,在他们的捐赠决策过程中,他们希望了解接受者的诊断、临床状况和预计结果。大多数活体肝脏捐赠者(82%)认为,在决定是否捐赠给ALF患者时,紧急咨询服务是有用的。结论移植项目应在知情同意过程中纳入受者健康信息,并提供咨询服务,以支持活体肝供者的决策。
{"title":"A Survey Study of Liver Donors' Information Needs on Recipient Outcomes in High-Risk Donation Scenarios.","authors":"Adrienne Chen, Allison Carroll, Elisa J Gordon, Josh Levitsky","doi":"10.1177/15269248251383952","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251383952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionLiving donor liver transplantation is expanding worldwide as a treatment for end-stage liver disease, especially in high-risk recipients. No standardized information is provided to donors during the informed consent process. Consequently, variable information may be provided to the donor about the recipient, which may undermine donor-informed consent.Research QuestionsIn high-risk donation scenarios, it is uncertain whether information disclosed about the recipient is sufficient for donor-informed decision-making. Would information about the recipient's potential adverse and beneficial short- and long-term outcomes help donors make a decision about donating?DesignAn online survey was conducted of previous living liver donors' likelihood of donating and information needs regarding their recipients in 3 hypothetical high-risk clinical scenarios: alcoholic liver disease (ALD) with high relapse risk, acute liver failure (ALF), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with high recurrence risk.ResultsA total of 98 living liver donors participated in this study. Most living liver donors expressed willingness to donate to a patient in each scenario: ALD (51%), ALF (56%), and HCC (85%). Most living liver donors (56% to 93%) reported desiring information about the recipient's diagnosis, clinical condition, and projected outcomes in their donation decision-making process. Most living liver donors (82%) considered an acute consultation service to be useful in deciding whether to donate to a patient with ALF.ConclusionsThe findings suggested that transplant programs should incorporate recipient health information with recipient consent into the informed consent process and offer consultation services to support living liver donors' decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"206-213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145308385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Physical Activity Levels and Performance Among High-Intensity Transplant Athletes at the World Transplant Games. 在世界移植运动会中探索高强度移植运动员的身体活动水平和表现。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251383949
Bart Rienties, Leigh Martin, Fereshte Goshtasbpour

IntroductionWhile most transplant recipients remain sedentary posttransplant, some transplant recipients are able to meet and even exceed recommended physical activity levels.Research QuestionThe objective of this study was (1) to explore what physical activity levels 25 recipient athletes could sustain over a 7-month period while preparing for and participating in the World Transplant Games in cycling and/or triathlon, and (2) what intensity levels recipients sustained in competitive conditions.DesignThe study adopted an observational descriptive research design and used physical activity self-reported data of 25 recipient athletes and self-tracked data from online social fitness network apps such as Strava. It also examined World Transplant Games performance metrics to evaluate transplant athletes' capabilities in competitive settings.ResultsFindings revealed that transplant athletes exceeded the current physical activity level guidelines by 300% over a 7-month period, with an average of 8.33 h per week of self-reported activities and 4.67 h per week of self-tracked moderate to intense physical activity.ConclusionThe findings highlighted the need to consider the capabilities of transplant athletes in reassessing the current physical activity guidelines since the results demonstrated that enhanced performance in competition settings was attainable through physical activity and support. There is a need for more personalised physical activity metrics and recommendations for transplant recipients.

虽然大多数移植受者在移植后仍然久坐不动,但一些移植受者能够达到甚至超过推荐的身体活动水平。研究问题:本研究的目的是:(1)探索25名移植运动员在准备和参加世界移植运动会的自行车和/或铁人三项比赛中,在7个月的时间里能保持什么样的体育活动水平;(2)移植运动员在竞争条件下能保持什么样的强度水平。本研究采用了观察性描述性研究设计,使用了25名接受者运动员的身体活动自我报告数据和来自Strava等在线社交健身网络应用程序的自我跟踪数据。它还检查了世界移植运动会的表现指标,以评估移植运动员在竞争环境中的能力。结果研究结果显示,移植运动员在7个月的时间里,平均每周8.33小时的自我报告活动和4.67小时的自我跟踪中度至高强度的身体活动,超过了目前的身体活动水平指南的300%。结论:研究结果强调了在重新评估目前的体育活动指南时需要考虑移植运动员的能力,因为结果表明,通过体育活动和支持可以提高比赛环境中的表现。有必要为移植受者提供更个性化的身体活动指标和建议。
{"title":"Exploring Physical Activity Levels and Performance Among High-Intensity Transplant Athletes at the World Transplant Games.","authors":"Bart Rienties, Leigh Martin, Fereshte Goshtasbpour","doi":"10.1177/15269248251383949","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251383949","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionWhile most transplant recipients remain sedentary posttransplant, some transplant recipients are able to meet and even exceed recommended physical activity levels.Research QuestionThe objective of this study was (1) to explore what physical activity levels 25 recipient athletes could sustain over a 7-month period while preparing for and participating in the World Transplant Games in cycling and/or triathlon, and (2) what intensity levels recipients sustained in competitive conditions.DesignThe study adopted an observational descriptive research design and used physical activity self-reported data of 25 recipient athletes and self-tracked data from online social fitness network apps such as Strava. It also examined World Transplant Games performance metrics to evaluate transplant athletes' capabilities in competitive settings.ResultsFindings revealed that transplant athletes exceeded the current physical activity level guidelines by 300% over a 7-month period, with an average of 8.33 h per week of self-reported activities and 4.67 h per week of self-tracked moderate to intense physical activity.ConclusionThe findings highlighted the need to consider the capabilities of transplant athletes in reassessing the current physical activity guidelines since the results demonstrated that enhanced performance in competition settings was attainable through physical activity and support. There is a need for more personalised physical activity metrics and recommendations for transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"214-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12586726/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination Coverage and Effectiveness Among Pediatric Transplant Recipients. 2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)儿童移植受者的疫苗接种覆盖率和有效性
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-17 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251383951
Elizabeth Cohen, Sarah Hinderstein, Eve Carciofi, Kayla Hopkins, Hillary Kuzaro, Inci Yildirim

IntroductionIn pediatric solid organ transplant and bone marrow transplant recipients, there is minimal data describing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine uptake and effectiveness.Research QuestionsWhat is the real-world experience of COVID-19 vaccination, subsequent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and vaccine efficacy in pediatric heart, liver, kidney and bone marrow transplant recipients?DesignThis observational cohort study assessed COVID-19 vaccination rates and outcomes between March 2020 and January 2024 among pediatric heart, liver, kidney, and bone marrow transplant recipients. This study was approved by the local institutional review board as exempt.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-three pediatric solid organ transplant or bone marrow recipients were included; 33 of 133 (24.8%) were unvaccinated, 100 and 133 (75.2%) had at least 1 dose, and 72 of 133 (54.1%) completed at least 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccination. Ninety-two SARS-CoV-2 infection episodes in 74 of 133 (55.6%) patients. Fifty-eight (63%) episodes were in those who were never vaccinated or before completion of 3 doses and 34 (36.9%) episodes were after completion of the primary series (P = 0.09). Hospitalization was required in 2 of 34 (5.9%) and 7 of 59 (11.9%) of the infections among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. No severe cases occurred among vaccinated patients while severe infection was seen among those unvaccinated. Adjusted COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated as 52.6% (95% CI 7.0% -72%).ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccine uptake remains suboptimal among pediatric transplant recipients and completion of primary series is low. Further studies to understand dynamics of vaccine acceptance and vaccine effectiveness among pediatric transplant patients are needed.

在儿童实体器官移植和骨髓移植受者中,关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗摄取和有效性的数据很少。研究问题:在儿童心脏、肝脏、肾脏和骨髓移植受者中,COVID-19疫苗接种、随后的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染和疫苗疗效的现实经验是什么?本观察性队列研究评估了2020年3月至2024年1月儿童心脏、肝脏、肾脏和骨髓移植受者的COVID-19疫苗接种率和结果。本研究获得当地机构审查委员会的豁免批准。结果共纳入133例儿童实体器官移植或骨髓受者;133人中有33人(24.8%)未接种疫苗,100人和133人(75.2%)至少接种了1剂疫苗,133人中有72人(54.1%)完成了至少3剂COVID-19疫苗接种。133例患者中74例(55.6%)发生92次SARS-CoV-2感染。58例(63%)病例发生在从未接种过疫苗或未接种3剂疫苗的人群中,34例(36.9%)病例发生在首次接种结束后(P = 0.09)。在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者中,34例感染中有2例(5.9%)和59例感染中有7例(11.9%)需要住院治疗。接种疫苗的患者未发生严重病例,未接种疫苗的患者出现严重感染。经调整的COVID-19疫苗对SARS-CoV-2感染的有效性估计为52.6% (95% CI 7.0% -72%)。结论儿童移植受者的covid -19疫苗接种率仍不理想,初级系列的完成率较低。需要进一步的研究来了解儿童移植患者疫苗接受和疫苗有效性的动态。
{"title":"Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination Coverage and Effectiveness Among Pediatric Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Elizabeth Cohen, Sarah Hinderstein, Eve Carciofi, Kayla Hopkins, Hillary Kuzaro, Inci Yildirim","doi":"10.1177/15269248251383951","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251383951","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionIn pediatric solid organ transplant and bone marrow transplant recipients, there is minimal data describing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine uptake and effectiveness.Research QuestionsWhat is the real-world experience of COVID-19 vaccination, subsequent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and vaccine efficacy in pediatric heart, liver, kidney and bone marrow transplant recipients?DesignThis observational cohort study assessed COVID-19 vaccination rates and outcomes between March 2020 and January 2024 among pediatric heart, liver, kidney, and bone marrow transplant recipients. This study was approved by the local institutional review board as exempt.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-three pediatric solid organ transplant or bone marrow recipients were included; 33 of 133 (24.8%) were unvaccinated, 100 and 133 (75.2%) had at least 1 dose, and 72 of 133 (54.1%) completed at least 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccination. Ninety-two SARS-CoV-2 infection episodes in 74 of 133 (55.6%) patients. Fifty-eight (63%) episodes were in those who were never vaccinated or before completion of 3 doses and 34 (36.9%) episodes were after completion of the primary series (<i>P</i> = 0.09). Hospitalization was required in 2 of 34 (5.9%) and 7 of 59 (11.9%) of the infections among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. No severe cases occurred among vaccinated patients while severe infection was seen among those unvaccinated. Adjusted COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated as 52.6% (95% CI 7.0% -72%).ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccine uptake remains suboptimal among pediatric transplant recipients and completion of primary series is low. Further studies to understand dynamics of vaccine acceptance and vaccine effectiveness among pediatric transplant patients are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"221-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145308381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender Differences in Willingness to Be Evaluated for Living Kidney Donation. 评估活体肾脏捐献意愿的性别差异。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251383950
Ritah R Chumdermpadetsuk, Cayley Ryan-Claytor, Mary K Roberts, Zarmeen Salim, Jennifer M Kirk, Ashton Verdery, Selena Ortiz, Stalin Canizares, Belen Rivera, Devin E Eckhoff, Jonathan Daw

IntroductionWomen comprise 55% to 65% of living kidney donors. Most studies focus on individuals who underwent donor nephrectomies, rather than potential living donors prior to engagement with the healthcare system. Therefore, the underlying reasons for gender discrepancy are unclear.Research questionAmong relatives of patients with renal disease, do men and women differ in willingness to be evaluated for living kidney donation, regardless of prior donation behavior?DesignAn online survey administered in 2019 to US adult members of the Qualtrics Survey Panel whose relatives had weak or failing kidneys. The survey was designed to examine perspectives of living kidney donation from realistic potential donors. Self-reported willingness was compared between men and women for statistically significant differences. Average marginal effects of male gender on willingness and interaction effects estimated with multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for respondent/patient demographics and relationship.ResultsA total of 1647 responses showed 7.1% higher willingness among men (P = .016). Among those whose relatives (N = 808) were seeking transplants [subgroup], men had 13.1% higher willingness (P = .002). Interaction effect analysis showed men aged 70 to 79 years, with insurance, self-reported very good health, and self-reported medical contraindications, had significantly higher willingness than corresponding women. In the transplant subgroup, men aged 18 to 39 years and with full-time employment also had higher willingness.ConclusionMen showed 7.1% higher willingness to be evaluated for living kidney donation. Rather than reflecting a fixed difference, the existence and degree of gender difference were context-dependent. Identifying strategic interventions to facilitate male donation in contexts where they reported high willingness could improve access to transplantation.

女性占活体肾脏捐献者的55%至65%。大多数研究关注的是接受供体肾切除术的个体,而不是在与医疗系统接触之前的潜在活体供体。因此,性别差异的根本原因尚不清楚。研究问题:在肾脏疾病患者的亲属中,男性和女性在接受活体肾脏捐赠评估的意愿上是否存在差异,而不考虑之前的捐赠行为?一项于2019年对美国质量调查小组的成年成员进行的在线调查,这些成员的亲属患有肾脏衰弱或衰竭。该调查旨在从现实的潜在捐赠者那里考察活体肾脏捐赠的观点。自我报告的意愿在男性和女性之间进行比较,有统计学上的显著差异。用多变量logistic回归估计男性性别对意愿和交互效应的平均边际效应,并根据被调查者/患者人口统计学和关系进行调整。结果1647份问卷中,男性的意愿比男性高7.1% (P = 0.016)。亲属寻求移植的患者(N = 808)中,男性的意愿比男性高13.1% (P = 0.002)。交互效应分析显示,年龄在70 - 79岁之间、有保险、自我报告健康状况良好、自我报告有医疗禁忌症的男性的意愿明显高于相应年龄段的女性。在移植亚组中,年龄在18到39岁之间且有全职工作的男性也有更高的意愿。结论男性捐献活体肾脏的意愿比男性高7.1%。性别差异的存在和程度是情境依赖的,而不是反映一种固定的差异。在男性捐献意愿高的情况下,确定促进男性捐献的战略干预措施可以改善移植的可及性。
{"title":"Gender Differences in Willingness to Be Evaluated for Living Kidney Donation.","authors":"Ritah R Chumdermpadetsuk, Cayley Ryan-Claytor, Mary K Roberts, Zarmeen Salim, Jennifer M Kirk, Ashton Verdery, Selena Ortiz, Stalin Canizares, Belen Rivera, Devin E Eckhoff, Jonathan Daw","doi":"10.1177/15269248251383950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248251383950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionWomen comprise 55% to 65% of living kidney donors. Most studies focus on individuals who underwent donor nephrectomies, rather than potential living donors prior to engagement with the healthcare system. Therefore, the underlying reasons for gender discrepancy are unclear.Research questionAmong relatives of patients with renal disease, do men and women differ in willingness to be evaluated for living kidney donation, regardless of prior donation behavior?DesignAn online survey administered in 2019 to US adult members of the Qualtrics Survey Panel whose relatives had weak or failing kidneys. The survey was designed to examine perspectives of living kidney donation from realistic potential donors. Self-reported willingness was compared between men and women for statistically significant differences. Average marginal effects of male gender on willingness and interaction effects estimated with multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for respondent/patient demographics and relationship.ResultsA total of 1647 responses showed 7.1% higher willingness among men (<i>P</i> = .016). Among those whose relatives (<i>N</i> = 808) were seeking transplants [subgroup], men had 13.1% higher willingness (<i>P</i> = .002). Interaction effect analysis showed men aged 70 to 79 years, with insurance, self-reported very good health, and self-reported medical contraindications, had significantly higher willingness than corresponding women. In the transplant subgroup, men aged 18 to 39 years and with full-time employment also had higher willingness.ConclusionMen showed 7.1% higher willingness to be evaluated for living kidney donation. Rather than reflecting a fixed difference, the existence and degree of gender difference were context-dependent. Identifying strategic interventions to facilitate male donation in contexts where they reported high willingness could improve access to transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":"35 4","pages":"195-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145445774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Intrapatient Variability of IR-Tacrolimus Versus LCP-Tacrolimus in a Cohort of Lung Transplant Recipients. 在肺移植受者队列中ir -他克莫司与lcp -他克莫司的患者内变异性比较。
IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251349773
Hannah Peterson, Jennifer Ferrante, Joelle Nelson, Reed Hall, Lara Jones, Holly Keyt, Elisabeth Kincaide

IntroductionIntrapatient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus and its predictors post-lung transplant are unclear. Project AimsThis program evaluation aimed to characterize the IPV of immediate-release versus LCP-tacrolimus and predictors of variability ≥30% in lung transplant recipients. DesignAdult lung transplant recipients who received immediate-release- or LCP-tacrolimus from January 2016 through August 2023 were included in this single-center retrospective evaluation. Immediate-release- and LCP-tacrolimus groups were matched 2:1 by time from transplant, presence of azole antifungal, and ethnicity. Three previously published equations calculated IPV. Outcomes to determine clinical impact of tacrolimus variability included de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) development, rejection, graft loss/mortality, eGFR <60 mL/min, infection. Time in therapeutic range was assessed. Data were analyzed to determine predictors of variability ≥30%. ResultsThere were no significant differences in the variability of immediate-release- versus LCP-tacrolimus among 3 equations used. There was no difference in de novo DSA development, rejection, graft loss, mortality, eGFR <60 mL/min, or infection between groups. Recipients with rejection during follow-up had higher variability compared to those who did not (P = .04). Presence of CYP34A inhibition predicted variability >30% in multivariate analysis. Immediate-release tacrolimus had higher time in therapeutic range versus LCP-tacrolimus, 67% versus 33%, (P = .15). ConclusionThe IPV and associated clinical outcomes of immediate-release versus LCP-tacrolimus in lung transplant recipients did not significantly differ. Development of acute cellular rejection within 1 year follow-up was associated with higher tacrolimus variability regardless of formulation.

他克莫司的患者内变异性(IPV)及其肺移植后的预测因素尚不清楚。项目目的:本项目评估旨在表征他克莫司速释与lcp -他克莫司的IPV,以及肺移植受者变异性≥30%的预测因子。2016年1月至2023年8月接受他克莫司速释或lcp -他克莫司治疗的成人肺移植受者纳入本单中心回顾性评价。他克莫司速释组和lcp -他克莫司组按移植时间、存在唑类抗真菌药物和种族2:1匹配。三个先前发表的公式计算了IPV。确定他克莫司变异性临床影响的结果包括:新生供体特异性抗体(DSA)产生、排斥反应、移植物损失/死亡率、eGFR (P = 0.04)。在多变量分析中,CYP34A抑制的存在预测变异率为30%。速释他克莫司在治疗范围内的时间比lcp -他克莫司长,分别为67%和33% (P = 0.15)。结论他克莫司缓释与lcp -他克莫司在肺移植术后的IPV及相关临床结果无显著差异。1年随访期间急性细胞排斥反应的发生与他克莫司的变异性增高有关,与配方无关。
{"title":"Comparison of Intrapatient Variability of IR-Tacrolimus Versus LCP-Tacrolimus in a Cohort of Lung Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Hannah Peterson, Jennifer Ferrante, Joelle Nelson, Reed Hall, Lara Jones, Holly Keyt, Elisabeth Kincaide","doi":"10.1177/15269248251349773","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251349773","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionIntrapatient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus and its predictors post-lung transplant are unclear. Project AimsThis program evaluation aimed to characterize the IPV of immediate-release versus LCP-tacrolimus and predictors of variability ≥30% in lung transplant recipients. DesignAdult lung transplant recipients who received immediate-release- or LCP-tacrolimus from January 2016 through August 2023 were included in this single-center retrospective evaluation. Immediate-release- and LCP-tacrolimus groups were matched 2:1 by time from transplant, presence of azole antifungal, and ethnicity. Three previously published equations calculated IPV. Outcomes to determine clinical impact of tacrolimus variability included de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) development, rejection, graft loss/mortality, eGFR <60 mL/min, infection. Time in therapeutic range was assessed. Data were analyzed to determine predictors of variability ≥30%. ResultsThere were no significant differences in the variability of immediate-release- versus LCP-tacrolimus among 3 equations used. There was no difference in de novo DSA development, rejection, graft loss, mortality, eGFR <60 mL/min, or infection between groups. Recipients with rejection during follow-up had higher variability compared to those who did not (<i>P</i> = .04). Presence of CYP34A inhibition predicted variability >30% in multivariate analysis. Immediate-release tacrolimus had higher time in therapeutic range versus LCP-tacrolimus, 67% versus 33%, (<i>P</i> = .15). ConclusionThe IPV and associated clinical outcomes of immediate-release versus LCP-tacrolimus in lung transplant recipients did not significantly differ. Development of acute cellular rejection within 1 year follow-up was associated with higher tacrolimus variability regardless of formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"183-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144317788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Factors Associated with Sleep Quality After Lung Transplantation. 探讨肺移植术后睡眠质量相关因素。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251349770
Seol Ju E Moon, Megan Kazakoff, Kristen B Jones, Haydar Abdul, Bryan M Willey, Dianxu Ren, Melissa L Vendetti, Annette DeVito Dabbs, Christopher C Imes

Introduction: Sleep quality after lung transplant is important for recovery, overall health, and performance of healthy behaviors, such as exercise. Research Aim: The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between sleep quality and factors likely to influence and/or be influenced by sleep. Design: This was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of a tele-rehab exercise intervention for lung transplant recipients. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, sleep quality, physical activity, symptom burden, and psychological distress data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with poor sleep quality. Results: Participants (N=88) were aged 56.4 (13.0) years and male (54.5%). Seventy-four percent of the patients met the established cut-off for poor sleep quality and the mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score was 7.1 (3.7). Recipients reported anxiety (n=21, 23.9%) and depression (n=27, 30.7%). When lung-specific items of the sleep questionnaire were explored, the reported presence of cough or snoring loudly was associated with poor sleep (P = .010). Patients reporting any psychological distress (n=33, 37.5%) had increased odds of experiencing poor sleep (odds ratio [OR]=13.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] =2.33, 264.7.01; P=.017). In a model examining respiratory symptoms concurrently, wheezing increased the odds of reporting poor sleep quality (OR=10.88, 95% CI=1.65, 222.02; P=.037). Conclusion: Clinical attention is needed to detect and manage symptom burden and psychological distress to improve sleep quality and optimize posttransplant recovery among lung recipients. Future studies examining these variables are needed to help guide screening and treatment protocols.

肺移植后的睡眠质量对恢复、整体健康和健康行为(如运动)的表现非常重要。研究目的:本研究的目的是探讨睡眠质量与可能影响和/或受睡眠影响的因素之间的关系。设计:这是对肺移植受者远程康复运动干预的随机对照试验数据的二次分析。收集基线人口统计学和临床特征、睡眠质量、身体活动、症状负担和心理困扰数据。采用多变量logistic回归模型确定与睡眠质量差相关的因素。结果:参与者(N=88),年龄56.4(13.0)岁,男性占54.5%。74%的患者达到了睡眠质量差的既定临界值,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数平均总分为7.1(3.7)。接受者报告焦虑(n=21, 23.9%)和抑郁(n=27, 30.7%)。当研究了睡眠问卷中肺特异性项目时,咳嗽或大声打鼾的报告与睡眠质量差有关(P = 0.010)。报告有任何心理困扰的患者(n=33, 37.5%)出现睡眠不良的几率增加(优势比[OR]=13.72;95%置信区间[CI] =2.33, 264.7.01;P = .017)。在同时检查呼吸系统症状的模型中,喘息增加了报告睡眠质量差的几率(OR=10.88, 95% CI=1.65, 222.02;P = .037)。结论:临床需注意发现和管理症状负担和心理困扰,以改善肺移植受者的睡眠质量,优化其术后恢复。未来的研究需要检查这些变量,以帮助指导筛查和治疗方案。
{"title":"Exploring Factors Associated with Sleep Quality After Lung Transplantation.","authors":"Seol Ju E Moon, Megan Kazakoff, Kristen B Jones, Haydar Abdul, Bryan M Willey, Dianxu Ren, Melissa L Vendetti, Annette DeVito Dabbs, Christopher C Imes","doi":"10.1177/15269248251349770","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251349770","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Sleep quality after lung transplant is important for recovery, overall health, and performance of healthy behaviors, such as exercise. <b>Research Aim:</b> The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between sleep quality and factors likely to influence and/or be influenced by sleep. <b>Design:</b> This was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of a tele-rehab exercise intervention for lung transplant recipients. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, sleep quality, physical activity, symptom burden, and psychological distress data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with poor sleep quality. <b>Results:</b> Participants (N=88) were aged 56.4 (13.0) years and male (54.5%). Seventy-four percent of the patients met the established cut-off for poor sleep quality and the mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score was 7.1 (3.7). Recipients reported anxiety (n=21, 23.9%) and depression (n=27, 30.7%). When lung-specific items of the sleep questionnaire were explored, the reported presence of cough or snoring loudly was associated with poor sleep (<i>P</i> = .010). Patients reporting any psychological distress (n=33, 37.5%) had increased odds of experiencing poor sleep (odds ratio [OR]=13.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] =2.33, 264.7.01; <i>P</i>=.017). In a model examining respiratory symptoms concurrently, wheezing increased the odds of reporting poor sleep quality (OR=10.88, 95% CI=1.65, 222.02; <i>P</i>=.037). <b>Conclusion:</b> Clinical attention is needed to detect and manage symptom burden and psychological distress to improve sleep quality and optimize posttransplant recovery among lung recipients. Future studies examining these variables are needed to help guide screening and treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"134-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306626/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144476483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety of Concomitant Use of Tacrolimus and High-Intensity Statins in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients. 他克莫司和高强度他汀类药物在肝肾移植患者中合用的安全性。
IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251349768
Kelsey Klein, Maia Klimatcheva, Reed Hall, Rupal Patel, Kermit V Speeg, Juan Guerrero, Christina Long

Due to increased risk of myalgia and rhabdomyolysis associated with the use of simvastatin with cyclosporine, use of high-intensity 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) is often avoided in transplant recipients. Aim: This program evaluation aimed to determine the safety of high-intensity statins in liver and kidney transplant recipients taking tacrolimus. Design: All liver and kidney transplant recipients who filled prescriptions for tacrolimus and any statin except for simvastatin between June 15, 2020 and July 22, 2022 were screened for inclusion. High-intensity was defined as atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg, or rosuvastatin 20 or 40 mg. The primary outcome was a composite of statin-related myalgia, statin-related rhabdomyolysis, and creatine kinase above the upper limit of normal. Secondary outcomes included liver function tests above 3 times the upper limit of normal, statin discontinuation, and statin dose decrease and associated reason. Results: A total of 178 recipients were included, with 100 receiving low-to-moderate-intensity statins and 78 receiving high-intensity statins. There were no differences between groups for statin-related myalgia, and no reported cases of statin-related rhabdomyolysis in either group. Low to moderate intensity statin use was associated with an increased rate of liver function test elevation (26% vs 11.5%, P = .014) occurring a median of 306 days (interquartile range [IQR] 134-725) post-statin initiation. Conclusion: In liver and kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, the use of high-intensity statins was not associated with an increased risk of myalgia, rhabdomyolysis, or elevated creatinine kinase when compared with low-to-moderate-intensity statin use.

由于辛伐他汀与环孢素联合使用会增加肌痛和横纹肌溶解的风险,移植受者通常避免使用高强度的3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶抑制剂(他汀类药物)。目的:本项目评估旨在确定高强度他汀类药物在服用他克莫司的肝肾移植受者中的安全性。设计:所有在2020年6月15日至2022年7月22日期间服用他克莫司和辛伐他汀以外的任何他汀类药物的肝脏和肾脏移植受者都被筛选纳入研究。高剂量定义为阿托伐他汀40或80mg,瑞舒伐他汀20或40mg。主要结果是他汀类药物相关肌痛、他汀类药物相关横纹肌溶解和肌酸激酶高于正常上限的综合结果。次要结局包括肝功能检查高于正常上限3倍、他汀类药物停药、他汀类药物剂量减少及相关原因。结果:共纳入178例患者,其中100例接受低至中等强度他汀类药物治疗,78例接受高强度他汀类药物治疗。两组间他汀类药物相关肌痛无差异,两组均无他汀类药物相关横纹肌溶解的病例报道。低至中等强度他汀类药物的使用与他汀类药物开始使用后中位306天(四分位间距[IQR] 134-725)肝功能测试升高率升高相关(26% vs 11.5%, P = 0.014)。结论:在接受他克莫司的肝肾移植受者中,与使用低至中等强度他汀相比,使用高强度他汀与肌痛、横纹肌溶解或肌酐激酶升高的风险增加无关。
{"title":"Safety of Concomitant Use of Tacrolimus and High-Intensity Statins in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Kelsey Klein, Maia Klimatcheva, Reed Hall, Rupal Patel, Kermit V Speeg, Juan Guerrero, Christina Long","doi":"10.1177/15269248251349768","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251349768","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to increased risk of myalgia and rhabdomyolysis associated with the use of simvastatin with cyclosporine, use of high-intensity 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) is often avoided in transplant recipients. <b>Aim:</b> This program evaluation aimed to determine the safety of high-intensity statins in liver and kidney transplant recipients taking tacrolimus. <b>Design:</b> All liver and kidney transplant recipients who filled prescriptions for tacrolimus and any statin except for simvastatin between June 15, 2020 and July 22, 2022 were screened for inclusion. High-intensity was defined as atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg, or rosuvastatin 20 or 40 mg. The primary outcome was a composite of statin-related myalgia, statin-related rhabdomyolysis, and creatine kinase above the upper limit of normal. Secondary outcomes included liver function tests above 3 times the upper limit of normal, statin discontinuation, and statin dose decrease and associated reason. <b>Results:</b> A total of 178 recipients were included, with 100 receiving low-to-moderate-intensity statins and 78 receiving high-intensity statins. There were no differences between groups for statin-related myalgia, and no reported cases of statin-related rhabdomyolysis in either group. Low to moderate intensity statin use was associated with an increased rate of liver function test elevation (26% vs 11.5%, <i>P</i> = .014) occurring a median of 306 days (interquartile range [IQR] 134-725) post-statin initiation. <b>Conclusion:</b> In liver and kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, the use of high-intensity statins was not associated with an increased risk of myalgia, rhabdomyolysis, or elevated creatinine kinase when compared with low-to-moderate-intensity statin use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"178-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144507881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strengthening Qualitative Research Manuscript Preparation for Submission to Progress in Transplantation. 加强质性研究稿件准备,投稿《移植进展》。
IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251349759
Nicholas R Henry
{"title":"Strengthening Qualitative Research Manuscript Preparation for Submission to Progress in Transplantation.","authors":"Nicholas R Henry","doi":"10.1177/15269248251349759","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251349759","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"131-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144317789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Integrative Review on Exploring Organ Donation After Death by Circulatory Criteria in Canada. 加拿大按循环系统标准探索死后器官捐献的综合综述。
IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-13 DOI: 10.1177/15269248251349783
Kendra-Lee Dupuis, Amina Silva, Vanessa Silva E Silva

Introduction: Rising discrepancies between supply and demand of lifesaving organs necessitates considering advancements to improve the health outcomes of Canadians. There is an increased use of organs after death by circulatory criteria, however the evolution of this treatment should be explored to continue to advance practices and save lives. Objective: To summarize the literature on the evolution and use of organ donation after death by circulatory criteria in Canada, to highlight how this donation modality may support future advancements. Methods: A search of electronic databases for any date until June 1st, 2024, was performed. Additional searches of grey literature using Google Scholar and the snowball technique were performed. Applicable documents underwent a multi-phase screening process, and data were extracted, analyzed, and evaluated. Results: There were 793 documents located, and 50 were included in this review. Three main categories emerged among the documents that described the evolution of guidelines for death by circulatory criteria organ donation, experiences with program development and delivery for death by circulatory criteria organ donation and Canadian perspectives of this donation modality. Discussion: Canada has made strides in circulatory criteria organ donation practices through consensus meetings and discussions on key topics, yet variations in practice exist across the country that warrant further investigation when considering future advancements. Conclusion: While national efforts have advanced practices, ongoing variations across programs highlighted the need for continued evaluation, education and harmonization to maximize the life-saving potential of organ donation practices.

导言:救生器官的供需差距越来越大,必须考虑改善加拿大人的健康状况。根据循环标准,死后器官的使用有所增加,但应探索这种治疗的演变,以继续推进实践并挽救生命。目的:总结加拿大按循环标准死后器官捐献的发展和使用的文献,强调这种捐赠方式如何支持未来的进步。方法:检索截至2024年6月1日的电子数据库。使用谷歌Scholar和雪球技术进行灰色文献的额外搜索。适用的文件经过多阶段筛选过程,数据被提取、分析和评估。结果:共检索到文献793篇,纳入文献50篇。这些文件中出现了三个主要类别,描述了循环标准死亡器官捐赠指南的演变,循环标准死亡器官捐赠方案开发和交付的经验以及加拿大对这种捐赠方式的看法。讨论:加拿大在循环标准器官捐赠实践方面取得了长足的进步,通过共识会议和关键主题的讨论,然而,在考虑未来的进展时,全国各地的实践存在差异,值得进一步调查。结论:虽然国家的努力取得了先进的实践成果,但各个项目之间的持续变化突出了继续评估、教育和协调的必要性,以最大限度地发挥器官捐赠实践的救生潜力。
{"title":"An Integrative Review on Exploring Organ Donation After Death by Circulatory Criteria in Canada.","authors":"Kendra-Lee Dupuis, Amina Silva, Vanessa Silva E Silva","doi":"10.1177/15269248251349783","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248251349783","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Rising discrepancies between supply and demand of lifesaving organs necessitates considering advancements to improve the health outcomes of Canadians. There is an increased use of organs after death by circulatory criteria, however the evolution of this treatment should be explored to continue to advance practices and save lives. <b>Objective:</b> To summarize the literature on the evolution and use of organ donation after death by circulatory criteria in Canada, to highlight how this donation modality may support future advancements. <b>Methods:</b> A search of electronic databases for any date until June 1st, 2024, was performed. Additional searches of grey literature using Google Scholar and the snowball technique were performed. Applicable documents underwent a multi-phase screening process, and data were extracted, analyzed, and evaluated. <b>Results:</b> There were 793 documents located, and 50 were included in this review. Three main categories emerged among the documents that described the evolution of guidelines for death by circulatory criteria organ donation, experiences with program development and delivery for death by circulatory criteria organ donation and Canadian perspectives of this donation modality. <b>Discussion:</b> Canada has made strides in circulatory criteria organ donation practices through consensus meetings and discussions on key topics, yet variations in practice exist across the country that warrant further investigation when considering future advancements. <b>Conclusion:</b> While national efforts have advanced practices, ongoing variations across programs highlighted the need for continued evaluation, education and harmonization to maximize the life-saving potential of organ donation practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"161-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12284339/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144286397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Progress in Transplantation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1