Oliver G Ralph, Michael D Williams, Edie Y Chan, Oyedolamu Olaitan
{"title":"Racial Variation of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Kidney Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Oliver G Ralph, Michael D Williams, Edie Y Chan, Oyedolamu Olaitan","doi":"10.1177/15269248241304787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a need for a noninvasive, affordable, sensitive, and specific biomarker to diagnose early acute rejection, to negate the need for frequent biopsies. Dd-cfDNA is a powerful adjunct yet there is limited data on the ethnic differences in its values. There is anecdotal evidence that dd-cfDNA values at rejection may be higher in Black as compared to non-Black recipients. This study aims to add to this literature while defining such variability and comparing it to previously validated cutoffs for dd-cfDNA of 0.5% or 1%.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective observational study of patients who underwent graft biopsies with a preceding, paired, dd-cfDNA value. Recipients were separated into White, Black, and Hispanic racial and ethnic groups, and dd-cfDNA values at rejection versus nonrejection were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With 0.5% and 1% cutoffs, false negative rates for rejection were 13% and 22%, respectively. The false positive rate was 38.4%. 12.2% of Black recipients, 11.8% of Hispanic recipients, and 44% of White recipients had rejection with a negative AlloSure<sup>®</sup>. Values >0.5% corresponded to histologic rejection in 61.5% of Black, 66.7% of White, and 56.3% of Hispanic recipients. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 65.5% of rejection cases in Black recipients, while exhibiting the lowest rate of T-cell-mediated rejection. Dd-cfDNA values gave an accurate diagnosis of rejection in 52.8% of recipients with AMR versus 19.3% in TCMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that dd-cfDNA was applicable to Black recipients with a robust ability to detect antibody-mediated rejection, as compared to White and Hispanic recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"15269248241304787"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248241304787","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: There is a need for a noninvasive, affordable, sensitive, and specific biomarker to diagnose early acute rejection, to negate the need for frequent biopsies. Dd-cfDNA is a powerful adjunct yet there is limited data on the ethnic differences in its values. There is anecdotal evidence that dd-cfDNA values at rejection may be higher in Black as compared to non-Black recipients. This study aims to add to this literature while defining such variability and comparing it to previously validated cutoffs for dd-cfDNA of 0.5% or 1%.
Design: This was a single-center retrospective observational study of patients who underwent graft biopsies with a preceding, paired, dd-cfDNA value. Recipients were separated into White, Black, and Hispanic racial and ethnic groups, and dd-cfDNA values at rejection versus nonrejection were compared.
Results: With 0.5% and 1% cutoffs, false negative rates for rejection were 13% and 22%, respectively. The false positive rate was 38.4%. 12.2% of Black recipients, 11.8% of Hispanic recipients, and 44% of White recipients had rejection with a negative AlloSure®. Values >0.5% corresponded to histologic rejection in 61.5% of Black, 66.7% of White, and 56.3% of Hispanic recipients. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 65.5% of rejection cases in Black recipients, while exhibiting the lowest rate of T-cell-mediated rejection. Dd-cfDNA values gave an accurate diagnosis of rejection in 52.8% of recipients with AMR versus 19.3% in TCMR.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that dd-cfDNA was applicable to Black recipients with a robust ability to detect antibody-mediated rejection, as compared to White and Hispanic recipients.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.