LPS Increases Artery but Not Airway Contraction in Precision Cut Lung Slices from a Mouse Model of ARDS.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1165/rcmb.2024-0249OC
Emma Lamanna, Zoe F Kropf, Raymond Luong, Matthew Narayan, Elizabeth A Richards, Bailey Cardwell, Simon G Royce, Claudia A Nold-Petry, Jane E Bourke
{"title":"LPS Increases Artery but Not Airway Contraction in Precision Cut Lung Slices from a Mouse Model of ARDS.","authors":"Emma Lamanna, Zoe F Kropf, Raymond Luong, Matthew Narayan, Elizabeth A Richards, Bailey Cardwell, Simon G Royce, Claudia A Nold-Petry, Jane E Bourke","doi":"10.1165/rcmb.2024-0249OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) results in decreased quality of life, including increased risk of pulmonary hypertension (PH). In animal models, ARDS can be induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which can disrupt the pulmonary endothelium and epithelium and induce inflammation. We tested whether <i>in vivo</i> administration or <i>ex vivo</i> treatment with LPS alters the reactivity of intrapulmonary arteries and airways to constrictors relevant to both ARDS and PH, using the precision cut lung slice (PCLS) technique. Mice were administered LPS (10μg/50μl, intranasal) or saline daily for 4d before collection of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) or preparation of PCLS. Alternatively, PCLS from naïve mice were left untreated or treated <i>ex vivo</i> with LPS (10μg/mL) or tumour necrosis factor (TNF, 10ng/mL) for 18h. Contraction to endothelin-1 (ET-1), U46619 (a stable mimetic of TXA<sub>2</sub>) or serotonin (5HT) were quantified. <i>In vivo</i> LPS administration increased BAL total inflammatory cells 5-fold, neutrophils 125-fold and protein 2-fold, as well as the thickness of the pulmonary arterial smooth muscle layer. After <i>in vivo</i> LPS, contraction of intrapulmonary arteries in PCLS to ET-1 and U46619, but not 5HT, increased, while bronchoconstrictor responses were unchanged. In PCLS treated with LPS <i>ex vivo</i>, these differential effects on pulmonary artery and airway contraction were maintained. While LPS increased TNF secretion from PCLS, TNF treatment only increased U46619-induced vasoconstriction. This study demonstrates the potential contributions of LPS-induced inflammation and vascular remodelling to altered intrapulmonary artery reactivity to specific agonists with implications for ARDS-associated PH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7655,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2024-0249OC","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) results in decreased quality of life, including increased risk of pulmonary hypertension (PH). In animal models, ARDS can be induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which can disrupt the pulmonary endothelium and epithelium and induce inflammation. We tested whether in vivo administration or ex vivo treatment with LPS alters the reactivity of intrapulmonary arteries and airways to constrictors relevant to both ARDS and PH, using the precision cut lung slice (PCLS) technique. Mice were administered LPS (10μg/50μl, intranasal) or saline daily for 4d before collection of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) or preparation of PCLS. Alternatively, PCLS from naïve mice were left untreated or treated ex vivo with LPS (10μg/mL) or tumour necrosis factor (TNF, 10ng/mL) for 18h. Contraction to endothelin-1 (ET-1), U46619 (a stable mimetic of TXA2) or serotonin (5HT) were quantified. In vivo LPS administration increased BAL total inflammatory cells 5-fold, neutrophils 125-fold and protein 2-fold, as well as the thickness of the pulmonary arterial smooth muscle layer. After in vivo LPS, contraction of intrapulmonary arteries in PCLS to ET-1 and U46619, but not 5HT, increased, while bronchoconstrictor responses were unchanged. In PCLS treated with LPS ex vivo, these differential effects on pulmonary artery and airway contraction were maintained. While LPS increased TNF secretion from PCLS, TNF treatment only increased U46619-induced vasoconstriction. This study demonstrates the potential contributions of LPS-induced inflammation and vascular remodelling to altered intrapulmonary artery reactivity to specific agonists with implications for ARDS-associated PH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
370
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology publishes papers that report significant and original observations in the area of pulmonary biology. The focus of the Journal includes, but is not limited to, cellular, biochemical, molecular, developmental, genetic, and immunologic studies of lung cells and molecules.
期刊最新文献
LPS Increases Artery but Not Airway Contraction in Precision Cut Lung Slices from a Mouse Model of ARDS. Multicohort Analysis of Bronchial Epithelial Cell Expression in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Asthma Reveals Four Clinically Distinct Clusters. Sectm1a Depletion Promotes Neutrophil Recruitment during Pneumococcal Pneumonia. Fetal Tracheal Occlusion Corelates with Normalized YAP Expression and Alveolar Epithelial Differentiation in CDH. Targeting S1PR2 in Sepsis, One Fragmented Mitochondrion at a Time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1