Combined stochastic modelling of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EFSA Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.e221112
Nikola Maciejewska, Constantine-Richard Stefanou, Leonardos Stathas, Konstantinos Koutsoumanis
{"title":"Combined stochastic modelling of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms","authors":"Nikola Maciejewska,&nbsp;Constantine-Richard Stefanou,&nbsp;Leonardos Stathas,&nbsp;Konstantinos Koutsoumanis","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.e221112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) of pathogens in food safety is well established, but steps are being taken to expand this methodology to food spoilage. Parallels can be drawn between the steps involved in a QMRA for pathogens and its application to specific spoilage organisms (SSO). During hazard characterisation for pathogens, the appropriate dose–response model is used to link the hazard level to the health outcome by estimating the probability of illness, resulting from the ingestion of a certain dose of the hazard. The dose–response model, in the case of food spoilage, may be translated into a spoilage-response relationship linking the spoilage-level with the probability the consumer will discard the food and not consume it. Such models are developed with sensory testing, assessing consumers sensitivity to microbial spoilage quality defects and correlating them to the SSO concentration. Ignoring food spoilage before the stated expiration date can lead to the final health risk being overestimated, since cases in which the food item poses a real risk to the consumer but is not consumed due to perceived spoilage are not excluded. Plenty of risk assessments have been carried out for pathogens in different RTE foods. What is missing is the integration of the two approaches into a single model that can estimate the risk of illness, factoring in the variability of consumer responses to spoilage. The spoilage-response relationship was combined with a stochastic modelling approach for lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> growth, also taking into account microbial interaction between LAB and <i>L. monocytogenes</i> (Jameson effect) to increase accuracy. The comparison of results between the ‘Baseline’ and the ‘Spoilage-informed’ approach showed significant difference in listeriosis cases, both for consumers under and over 65 years old. These results may suggest, that the hypothesis about overestimation of listeriosis risk in case of not taking into account product spoilage is correct. The combined QMRA model developed in the present study can be a useful tool for risk management decisions in the meat industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"22 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.e221112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.e221112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) of pathogens in food safety is well established, but steps are being taken to expand this methodology to food spoilage. Parallels can be drawn between the steps involved in a QMRA for pathogens and its application to specific spoilage organisms (SSO). During hazard characterisation for pathogens, the appropriate dose–response model is used to link the hazard level to the health outcome by estimating the probability of illness, resulting from the ingestion of a certain dose of the hazard. The dose–response model, in the case of food spoilage, may be translated into a spoilage-response relationship linking the spoilage-level with the probability the consumer will discard the food and not consume it. Such models are developed with sensory testing, assessing consumers sensitivity to microbial spoilage quality defects and correlating them to the SSO concentration. Ignoring food spoilage before the stated expiration date can lead to the final health risk being overestimated, since cases in which the food item poses a real risk to the consumer but is not consumed due to perceived spoilage are not excluded. Plenty of risk assessments have been carried out for pathogens in different RTE foods. What is missing is the integration of the two approaches into a single model that can estimate the risk of illness, factoring in the variability of consumer responses to spoilage. The spoilage-response relationship was combined with a stochastic modelling approach for lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and Listeria monocytogenes growth, also taking into account microbial interaction between LAB and L. monocytogenes (Jameson effect) to increase accuracy. The comparison of results between the ‘Baseline’ and the ‘Spoilage-informed’ approach showed significant difference in listeriosis cases, both for consumers under and over 65 years old. These results may suggest, that the hypothesis about overestimation of listeriosis risk in case of not taking into account product spoilage is correct. The combined QMRA model developed in the present study can be a useful tool for risk management decisions in the meat industry.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致病微生物和腐败微生物的联合随机模型
食品安全中病原体的定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)已经建立,但正在采取步骤将这种方法扩展到食品腐败。在病原体的QMRA及其对特定腐败生物体(SSO)的应用中所涉及的步骤之间可以得出相似之处。在对病原体进行危害表征期间,使用适当的剂量-反应模型,通过估计因摄入一定剂量的危害而导致的疾病概率,将危害水平与健康结果联系起来。在食品腐败的情况下,剂量-反应模型可以转化为腐败-反应关系,将腐败程度与消费者丢弃而不消费食品的概率联系起来。这些模型是通过感官测试开发的,评估消费者对微生物腐败质量缺陷的敏感性,并将其与SSO浓度相关联。在规定的截止日期之前忽视食品变质可能导致最终的健康风险被高估,因为不排除食品对消费者构成实际风险,但由于感知到变质而不食用的情况。对不同RTE食品中的病原体进行了大量的风险评估。缺少的是将这两种方法整合到一个单一的模型中,这个模型可以估计疾病的风险,并考虑到消费者对腐败的反应的可变性。腐坏反应关系与乳酸菌(LAB)和单核增生李斯特菌生长的随机建模方法相结合,同时考虑了乳酸菌和单核增生李斯特菌之间的微生物相互作用(Jameson效应)以提高准确性。“基线”和“腐败知情”方法之间的结果比较显示,65岁以下和65岁以上消费者的李斯特菌病病例有显著差异。这些结果可能表明,在不考虑产品腐败的情况下高估李斯特菌病风险的假设是正确的。本研究开发的组合QMRA模型可以成为肉类行业风险管理决策的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
期刊最新文献
Safety evaluation of an extension of use of the food enzyme cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase from the non-genetically modified Anoxybacillus caldiproteolyticus strain AE-KCGT Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase from the non-genetically modified Anoxybacillus caldiproteolyticus strain AE-KCGT Statement on the update of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for copper compounds in light of the EFSA scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of the health-based guidance values (HBGVs) and exposure assessment from all sources Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 16627 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Microferm Ltd.) Safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of vitamin B2 (98%) and vitamin B2 (80%) produced with Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 7.449 for all animal species (Chifeng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1