Statement on the update of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for copper compounds in light of the EFSA scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of the health-based guidance values (HBGVs) and exposure assessment from all sources
{"title":"Statement on the update of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for copper compounds in light of the EFSA scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of the health-based guidance values (HBGVs) and exposure assessment from all sources","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In compliance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) for copper compounds in light of the EFSA Scientific Committee opinion on the re-evaluation of the health-based guidance values (HBGVs) and exposure assessment from all sources. Based on the exposure calculations performed according to three different scenarios, the updated occurrence data and the residues from the new intended uses are not expected to have an impact on the chronic exposure calculations conducted under the framework of the EFSA Scientific Committee assessment. Therefore, the conclusions of the previous assessment by EFSA Scientific Committee are still valid. Since the current copper exposure is expected to cover all sources of copper, including the uses of copper as plant protection products (PPPs), it can be concluded that the authorised PPP uses for copper compounds and the new intended PPP uses present no health risk for the population, including children. Due to copper being also a micronutrient and ubiquitous in the environment, as requested in the mandate, the dietary risk assessment was performed following a different approach than the standard methodology for the dietary risk assessment of pesticide residues in the framework of setting and reviewing MRLs under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and in the peer review of pesticides under Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009. Therefore, all MRL proposals are suggested for further consideration by risk managers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9271","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In compliance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) for copper compounds in light of the EFSA Scientific Committee opinion on the re-evaluation of the health-based guidance values (HBGVs) and exposure assessment from all sources. Based on the exposure calculations performed according to three different scenarios, the updated occurrence data and the residues from the new intended uses are not expected to have an impact on the chronic exposure calculations conducted under the framework of the EFSA Scientific Committee assessment. Therefore, the conclusions of the previous assessment by EFSA Scientific Committee are still valid. Since the current copper exposure is expected to cover all sources of copper, including the uses of copper as plant protection products (PPPs), it can be concluded that the authorised PPP uses for copper compounds and the new intended PPP uses present no health risk for the population, including children. Due to copper being also a micronutrient and ubiquitous in the environment, as requested in the mandate, the dietary risk assessment was performed following a different approach than the standard methodology for the dietary risk assessment of pesticide residues in the framework of setting and reviewing MRLs under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and in the peer review of pesticides under Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009. Therefore, all MRL proposals are suggested for further consideration by risk managers.
根据法规(EC) No 396/2005第43条,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)根据EFSA科学委员会关于重新评估基于健康的指导值(HBGVs)和所有来源的暴露评估的意见,审查了铜化合物的最大残留水平(MRLs)。根据根据三种不同情况进行的暴露计算,更新的发生数据和来自新预期用途的残留物预计不会对在欧洲食品安全局科学委员会评估框架下进行的慢性暴露计算产生影响。因此,EFSA科学委员会先前的评估结论仍然有效。由于目前的铜接触预计将涵盖所有铜来源,包括将铜用作植物保护产品,因此可以得出结论,铜化合物的经批准的公私伙伴关系用途和新的公私伙伴关系预期用途不会对包括儿童在内的人口构成健康风险。由于铜也是一种微量营养素,并且在环境中普遍存在,因此,根据法规(EC) No 396/2005和法规(EU) No 1107/2009对农药进行同行评议时,膳食风险评估采用的方法与农药残留膳食风险评估的标准方法不同。因此,建议所有MRL建议供风险管理者进一步考虑。
期刊介绍:
The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.