When differentiated empowering leadership hurts team performance: The roles of information sharing and tenure diversity

IF 4.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Human Relations Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1177/00187267241303265
Biyun Hu, Soojung Han, Crystal M. Harold, Lauren D’Innocenzo, Soojin Lee
{"title":"When differentiated empowering leadership hurts team performance: The roles of information sharing and tenure diversity","authors":"Biyun Hu, Soojung Han, Crystal M. Harold, Lauren D’Innocenzo, Soojin Lee","doi":"10.1177/00187267241303265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The empowering leadership literature supports that empowering team members can result in a host of positive outcomes for work teams. These findings, however, largely assume that leaders uniformly empower their followers and overlook the potential consequences when leaders differentially empower members of the same team. In this study, we develop a theoretical model to delineate how and when differentiated empowering leadership affects team task performance. Drawing from social comparison theory, we position differentiated empowering leadership as adversely affecting team information sharing and subsequent team task performance. Moreover, we propose the indirect effect of differentiated empowering leadership on team task performance via team information sharing is conditional on organizational tenure diversity. To test our proposed model, we conducted a three-wave field study with 74 teams and their leaders from 17 South Korean firms. The results suggest that differentiated empowering leadership negatively affects team task performance through reduced team information sharing. This negative indirect effect was stronger in teams where organizational tenure diversity was low, compared with when it was high. The conclusions drawn from our research can help managers, HR professionals, and leadership coaches better understand and manage the complexities of empowering leadership to enhance team effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267241303265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The empowering leadership literature supports that empowering team members can result in a host of positive outcomes for work teams. These findings, however, largely assume that leaders uniformly empower their followers and overlook the potential consequences when leaders differentially empower members of the same team. In this study, we develop a theoretical model to delineate how and when differentiated empowering leadership affects team task performance. Drawing from social comparison theory, we position differentiated empowering leadership as adversely affecting team information sharing and subsequent team task performance. Moreover, we propose the indirect effect of differentiated empowering leadership on team task performance via team information sharing is conditional on organizational tenure diversity. To test our proposed model, we conducted a three-wave field study with 74 teams and their leaders from 17 South Korean firms. The results suggest that differentiated empowering leadership negatively affects team task performance through reduced team information sharing. This negative indirect effect was stronger in teams where organizational tenure diversity was low, compared with when it was high. The conclusions drawn from our research can help managers, HR professionals, and leadership coaches better understand and manage the complexities of empowering leadership to enhance team effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当差异化授权领导损害团队绩效时:信息共享和任期多样性的作用
授权领导文献支持授权团队成员可以为工作团队带来许多积极的结果。然而,这些发现在很大程度上假设领导者统一地赋予下属权力,而忽略了领导者对同一团队成员不同地赋予权力的潜在后果。在本研究中,我们建立了一个理论模型来描述差异化授权领导如何以及何时影响团队任务绩效。根据社会比较理论,我们将差异化授权领导定位为对团队信息共享和随后的团队任务绩效产生不利影响。此外,我们提出差异化授权领导通过团队信息共享对团队任务绩效的间接影响以组织任期多样性为条件。为了验证我们提出的模型,我们对来自17家韩国公司的74个团队及其领导人进行了三波实地研究。结果表明,差异化授权领导通过减少团队信息共享而对团队任务绩效产生负向影响。这种消极的间接影响在组织任期多样性低的团队中比在组织任期多样性高的团队中更强。从我们的研究中得出的结论可以帮助管理者、人力资源专业人士和领导力教练更好地理解和管理授权领导的复杂性,以提高团队效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Relations
Human Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.
期刊最新文献
Deflated in shame and puffed up in pride: How affective practices matter for entrepreneuring Moving with the trouble: How vulnerability and critical hope enable reckoning with complicity in entrepreneurial initiatives Collaborative spaces as places-of-entrepreneuring: A phenomenological investigation of entrepreneurs’ place-making experiences and practices Worker cooperative ‘regeneration’: Insights from the Brazilian Landless Rural Workers Movement Working around unpredictable clocks: Examining the impact of last-minute schedule changes on perceived contract breach and job performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1