Association Between Breastfeeding Peer Support and Confidence in Breastfeeding.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Human Lactation Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1177/08903344241299398
Hyo Jin Jean Jeon, Michelle Granner, Elizabeth Christiansen, Taya Kohnen, Sung-Yeon Park, Bret Sarnquist, Patricia MacNeil, Valery Soto, Olivia Deavers
{"title":"Association Between Breastfeeding Peer Support and Confidence in Breastfeeding.","authors":"Hyo Jin Jean Jeon, Michelle Granner, Elizabeth Christiansen, Taya Kohnen, Sung-Yeon Park, Bret Sarnquist, Patricia MacNeil, Valery Soto, Olivia Deavers","doi":"10.1177/08903344241299398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peer support programs may be effective for supporting breastfeeding among diverse groups, and in reducing disparities. This study provides insight regarding the implementation and outcomes of a peer breastfeeding support program.</p><p><strong>Research aims: </strong>(1) to examine how participation affected the outcomes of breastfeeding motivation, confidence, and coping strategies; and (2) to evaluate satisfaction with the program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Seven pilot sites in the United States uniquely implemented a federally-funded peer support program for low-income women. Data were collected using a survey and focus groups/interviews. Over 12 months, 1,296 women participated, comprising 615 peer support pairs. A total of 401 women responded to the survey. Twenty-three focus groups and 63 interviews were conducted across the seven sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who enrolled in the program during pregnancy: <i>t</i> (189) = -6.55, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and after the baby was born: <i>t</i> (170) = -2.59, <i>p</i> = 0.001, gained confidence in breastfeeding. More satisfied participants were more likely to breastfeed longer: <i>F</i> (7,352) = 12.75, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and cope with breastfeeding challenges: <i>F</i> (7,352) = 7.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective operation strategies of the peer breastfeeding support program have significantly influenced participant satisfaction. Introducing peer support for low-income women to share their breastfeeding experiences would be beneficial in enhancing breastfeeding rates. However, the generalizability of these findings may be limited to this U.S. federally-funded peer support program.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"8903344241299398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241299398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peer support programs may be effective for supporting breastfeeding among diverse groups, and in reducing disparities. This study provides insight regarding the implementation and outcomes of a peer breastfeeding support program.

Research aims: (1) to examine how participation affected the outcomes of breastfeeding motivation, confidence, and coping strategies; and (2) to evaluate satisfaction with the program.

Method: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Seven pilot sites in the United States uniquely implemented a federally-funded peer support program for low-income women. Data were collected using a survey and focus groups/interviews. Over 12 months, 1,296 women participated, comprising 615 peer support pairs. A total of 401 women responded to the survey. Twenty-three focus groups and 63 interviews were conducted across the seven sites.

Results: Participants who enrolled in the program during pregnancy: t (189) = -6.55, p < 0.001, and after the baby was born: t (170) = -2.59, p = 0.001, gained confidence in breastfeeding. More satisfied participants were more likely to breastfeed longer: F (7,352) = 12.75, p < 0.001, and cope with breastfeeding challenges: F (7,352) = 7.83, p < 0.001.

Conclusion: Effective operation strategies of the peer breastfeeding support program have significantly influenced participant satisfaction. Introducing peer support for low-income women to share their breastfeeding experiences would be beneficial in enhancing breastfeeding rates. However, the generalizability of these findings may be limited to this U.S. federally-funded peer support program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Lactation
Journal of Human Lactation 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are: To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities. To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL. In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features: Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.
期刊最新文献
Mothers' Gender-role Ideologies and Exclusive Breastfeeding in Western Rural China: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Utility of Secondary Data Analysis in Breastfeeding Research: Opportunities and Challenges. Development of Nipple Trauma Evaluation System With Deep Learning. Association Between Breastfeeding Peer Support and Confidence in Breastfeeding. Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Moisturizing Therapy in Treating Nipple Trauma and Nipple Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1