Zhexuan Zhang, Chieh-Wen Liu, Jeremy D Donaghue, Eric J Murray, Omar Mian, Ping Xia
{"title":"Patient-specific adaptive planning margin for whole bladder radiation therapy.","authors":"Zhexuan Zhang, Chieh-Wen Liu, Jeremy D Donaghue, Eric J Murray, Omar Mian, Ping Xia","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole bladder irradiation is an organ preservation treatment approach for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Conventional planning margins, typically 15-20 mm, increase normal tissue toxicity and limit possible dose escalation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to develop a patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation to minimize the planning target volume (PTV) while preserving adequate dose coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen patients who received whole-bladder irradiation were retrospectively selected for this study. We proposed a patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margin recipe, derived from the first five fractions of kV-CBCTs, to account for inter-fractional bladder changes. This recipe was validated using kV-CBCTs from fractions six to ten and the final five fractions. The goal was to achieve a residual volume, defined as the percentage of daily bladder volume (V<sub>daily</sub>) outside the PTV, of less than 5%. Adaptive and conventional plans were created using proposed and conventional margins, respectively. A dosimetric comparison of targets and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed between the two approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(V<sub>daily</sub>) decreased throughout the treatment course. The most notable inter-fractional bladder variations were in the superior and anterior directions. The patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margins, averaging 6 mm (± 2.9 mm), achieved a residual volume of less than 5%. Compared to conventional planning, the adaptive approach reduced PTV volume by an average of 135.3 cc (± 46.6 cc). A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was identified between residual volume and adaptive margins in the anterior, superior, left, and right directions. Using the proposed adaptive margins, the median residual volume was 0.71% (interquartile range 0.09%-3.55%), and the median (V<sub>daily</sub>) receiving the prescribed dose was 99.1% (interquartile range 95.3%-99.9%). Adaptive plans demonstrated superior OAR sparing compared to conventional plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation resulted in margins smaller than conventional ones, optimized normal tissue sparing, and maintained adequate PTV coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Whole bladder irradiation is an organ preservation treatment approach for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Conventional planning margins, typically 15-20 mm, increase normal tissue toxicity and limit possible dose escalation.
Purpose: The study aimed to develop a patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation to minimize the planning target volume (PTV) while preserving adequate dose coverage.
Methods: Sixteen patients who received whole-bladder irradiation were retrospectively selected for this study. We proposed a patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margin recipe, derived from the first five fractions of kV-CBCTs, to account for inter-fractional bladder changes. This recipe was validated using kV-CBCTs from fractions six to ten and the final five fractions. The goal was to achieve a residual volume, defined as the percentage of daily bladder volume (Vdaily) outside the PTV, of less than 5%. Adaptive and conventional plans were created using proposed and conventional margins, respectively. A dosimetric comparison of targets and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed between the two approaches.
Results: (Vdaily) decreased throughout the treatment course. The most notable inter-fractional bladder variations were in the superior and anterior directions. The patient-specific anisotropic adaptive margins, averaging 6 mm (± 2.9 mm), achieved a residual volume of less than 5%. Compared to conventional planning, the adaptive approach reduced PTV volume by an average of 135.3 cc (± 46.6 cc). A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was identified between residual volume and adaptive margins in the anterior, superior, left, and right directions. Using the proposed adaptive margins, the median residual volume was 0.71% (interquartile range 0.09%-3.55%), and the median (Vdaily) receiving the prescribed dose was 99.1% (interquartile range 95.3%-99.9%). Adaptive plans demonstrated superior OAR sparing compared to conventional plans.
Conclusions: The proposed patient-specific adaptive margin recipe for whole bladder irradiation resulted in margins smaller than conventional ones, optimized normal tissue sparing, and maintained adequate PTV coverage.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic