Evaluating the use of diagnostic CT with flattening filter free beams for palliative radiotherapy: Dosimetric impact of scanner calibration variability.
Madeleine L Van de Kleut, Lesley A Buckley, Elsayed S M Ali
{"title":"Evaluating the use of diagnostic CT with flattening filter free beams for palliative radiotherapy: Dosimetric impact of scanner calibration variability.","authors":"Madeleine L Van de Kleut, Lesley A Buckley, Elsayed S M Ali","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Palliative radiotherapy comprises a significant portion of the radiation treatment workload. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) improves dose conformity and, in conjunction with flattening filter free (FFF) delivery, can decrease treatment times, both of which are desirable in a population with a high probability of retreatment with large palliative doses per fraction. Combining FFF and VMAT delivery with planning based on previously acquired diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans has the potential to further expedite palliative treatment. This study evaluated the dosimetric uncertainty of using FFF beams with VMAT delivery on CT images acquired from different diagnostic vendors, and between different x-ray tube energies, in the palliative setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CT-relative electron density (CT-RED) curves were acquired for the local CT simulator at 100, 120, and 140 kVp, and for two diagnostic CT scanners at 120 kVp. Thirty palliative VMAT plans were recalculated for each CT-RED curve, with 6 MV flat, 6 FFF, and 10 FFF beams. The doses to 95% and 2% of the PTV, the maximum point dose to the spinal canal and esophagus, and the mean dose to the kidneys were compared between recalculated plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the dose clouds for a given fluence map calculated with CT-RED curves from different CT scanners at 120 kVp, the mean dose difference was at most 0.3% for each DVH metric. Similar results were reported when comparing dose clouds calculated with CT-RED curves for 100, 120, and 140 kVp on the CT simulator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study confirm that diagnostic scans acquired on machines different from the CT simulator associated with the TPS, are appropriate for VMAT treatment planning in the palliative setting with FFF photon beams.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Palliative radiotherapy comprises a significant portion of the radiation treatment workload. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) improves dose conformity and, in conjunction with flattening filter free (FFF) delivery, can decrease treatment times, both of which are desirable in a population with a high probability of retreatment with large palliative doses per fraction. Combining FFF and VMAT delivery with planning based on previously acquired diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans has the potential to further expedite palliative treatment. This study evaluated the dosimetric uncertainty of using FFF beams with VMAT delivery on CT images acquired from different diagnostic vendors, and between different x-ray tube energies, in the palliative setting.
Methods: CT-relative electron density (CT-RED) curves were acquired for the local CT simulator at 100, 120, and 140 kVp, and for two diagnostic CT scanners at 120 kVp. Thirty palliative VMAT plans were recalculated for each CT-RED curve, with 6 MV flat, 6 FFF, and 10 FFF beams. The doses to 95% and 2% of the PTV, the maximum point dose to the spinal canal and esophagus, and the mean dose to the kidneys were compared between recalculated plans.
Results: Comparing the dose clouds for a given fluence map calculated with CT-RED curves from different CT scanners at 120 kVp, the mean dose difference was at most 0.3% for each DVH metric. Similar results were reported when comparing dose clouds calculated with CT-RED curves for 100, 120, and 140 kVp on the CT simulator.
Conclusion: The results of this study confirm that diagnostic scans acquired on machines different from the CT simulator associated with the TPS, are appropriate for VMAT treatment planning in the palliative setting with FFF photon beams.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic