The Predict4All open-source word prediction and word correction engine in French language: a feasibility study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2445009
Mathieu Thebaud, Jean-Yves Antoine, Willy Allegre, Véronique Tsimba, Isabelle Bossard, Marion Crochetet, Emmanuelle Lopez, Céline Arbizu, Samuel Pouplin
{"title":"The Predict4All open-source word prediction and word correction engine in French language: a feasibility study.","authors":"Mathieu Thebaud, Jean-Yves Antoine, Willy Allegre, Véronique Tsimba, Isabelle Bossard, Marion Crochetet, Emmanuelle Lopez, Céline Arbizu, Samuel Pouplin","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2445009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information and communication technologies are crucial for social and professional integration, but access to technology can be difficult for people with physical impairments. Text entry can be slow and tiring. We developed a free and open-source module called <i>Predict4All</i> for use with AAC (augmentative/alternative communication) software in French language. It offers spelling error-tolerant word prediction. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the system in people with learning or physical impairments and to perform a preliminary evaluation of its efficacy on spelling correctness and text input speed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective interventional, two-center feasibility study between February 2020 and March 2022. We included people with learning difficulties or neurological diseases impacting verbal or written communication. We evaluated fatigue, cognitive load and satisfaction, spelling correctness and text input speed and technical issues. We used 3 experimental setups: WITHOUT (neither prediction nor correction), PRED (prediction without correction), PREDCORR (prediction with correction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve participants completed the study. Fatigue (all conditions), cognitive load, satisfaction (PRED and PREDCORR) did not differ between Day 0, Day 30 and Day 120, for either center. No technical issues were reported. The percentage of errors decreased significantly between Day 30 and Day 120 with word prediction software (<i>p</i> = 0.026), with no difference between PRED and PREDCORR (<i>p</i> < 0.447).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study has shed light on the potential of the Predict4All engine with successful results, as the system performed effectively without technical or methodological obstacles. Furthermore, the engine has been adopted in clinical practice at both centers by both healthcare professionals and users.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2445009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Information and communication technologies are crucial for social and professional integration, but access to technology can be difficult for people with physical impairments. Text entry can be slow and tiring. We developed a free and open-source module called Predict4All for use with AAC (augmentative/alternative communication) software in French language. It offers spelling error-tolerant word prediction. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the system in people with learning or physical impairments and to perform a preliminary evaluation of its efficacy on spelling correctness and text input speed.

Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective interventional, two-center feasibility study between February 2020 and March 2022. We included people with learning difficulties or neurological diseases impacting verbal or written communication. We evaluated fatigue, cognitive load and satisfaction, spelling correctness and text input speed and technical issues. We used 3 experimental setups: WITHOUT (neither prediction nor correction), PRED (prediction without correction), PREDCORR (prediction with correction).

Results: Twelve participants completed the study. Fatigue (all conditions), cognitive load, satisfaction (PRED and PREDCORR) did not differ between Day 0, Day 30 and Day 120, for either center. No technical issues were reported. The percentage of errors decreased significantly between Day 30 and Day 120 with word prediction software (p = 0.026), with no difference between PRED and PREDCORR (p < 0.447).

Conclusion: Our study has shed light on the potential of the Predict4All engine with successful results, as the system performed effectively without technical or methodological obstacles. Furthermore, the engine has been adopted in clinical practice at both centers by both healthcare professionals and users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
The Predict4All open-source word prediction and word correction engine in French language: a feasibility study. The demand for assistive technology, services, and satisfaction self-reports among people with disabilities in China. Outdoor mobility and driving among persons living with spinal cord injury in Sweden: a cross-sectional study. Factors influencing adoption and sustained use of rehabilitation technologies: a scoping review and qualitative analysis. Detangling experiences of agency in welfare technology use by home care recipients and their staff.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1