Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices of healthcare staff and students regarding disposal of unwantead medications: a systematic review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093636
Janeme Lam, Dayana El Nsouli, E Lyn Lee, Tawfiq Alqeisi, Ros Kane, Ian McGonagle, Despina Laparidou, David Nelson, Keivan Armani
{"title":"Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices of healthcare staff and students regarding disposal of unwantead medications: a systematic review.","authors":"Janeme Lam, Dayana El Nsouli, E Lyn Lee, Tawfiq Alqeisi, Ros Kane, Ian McGonagle, Despina Laparidou, David Nelson, Keivan Armani","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to review studies that examine healthcare professionals' and students' knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding medication disposal. We also explore recommendations and barriers related to appropriate medication disposal.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted that adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched up to 23 February 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria and setting: </strong>Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method primary research studies. There was no limitation on the publication date, geographical locations or the study settings.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Pharmacists, doctors, nurses and students from these respective professional groups in any country.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>The levels of healthcare staff and students' KAPs about disposal of unwanted medications.</p><p><strong>Date extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data extraction was conducted by four of the researchers independently. The study details were categorised into three main domains, that is, KAP using the KAP model. Other relevant information was also extracted, and synthesised in overall themes, such as challenges and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies from 18 countries (Asia n=21, the USA n=7, Africa n=5, EU n=2, South America n=2) were included. 86.5% (n=32) investigated participants' knowledge of medication disposal. Although there was a good level of awareness about the environmental impacts, there were significant gaps in knowledge regarding correct disposal methods, available services, guidelines and training. Thirty studies explored participants' attitudes towards medication disposal. There was a generally positive attitude towards the need for environmentally safe disposal practices. Thirty-five studies evaluated participants' practices in relation to medication disposal. Although there was generally a positive attitude and some understanding of appropriate disposal methods, the majority of the participants did not follow the practice guidelines, especially outside healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Discussions and conclusions: </strong>Although healthcare staff and students have fair knowledge and positive attitudes towards medicine disposal, their actual practices are lacking. One significant challenge identified is the limited awareness about proper disposal methods coupled with a lack of established services or guidelines. Even in cases where take-back programmes are available, they often face issues with accessibility. To tackle these challenges, it is suggested that governmental bodies should establish and enforce clear policies on medication disposal while also expanding educational initiatives to increase understanding among professionals and students. Furthermore, improving access to take-back programmes is crucial for ensuring safe medication disposal and minimising potential environmental and health hazards.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024503162.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"14 12","pages":"e093636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to review studies that examine healthcare professionals' and students' knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding medication disposal. We also explore recommendations and barriers related to appropriate medication disposal.

Design: A systematic review was conducted that adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched up to 23 February 2024.

Study eligibility criteria and setting: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method primary research studies. There was no limitation on the publication date, geographical locations or the study settings.

Participants: Pharmacists, doctors, nurses and students from these respective professional groups in any country.

Primary outcome measures: The levels of healthcare staff and students' KAPs about disposal of unwanted medications.

Date extraction and synthesis: Data extraction was conducted by four of the researchers independently. The study details were categorised into three main domains, that is, KAP using the KAP model. Other relevant information was also extracted, and synthesised in overall themes, such as challenges and recommendations.

Results: Thirty-seven studies from 18 countries (Asia n=21, the USA n=7, Africa n=5, EU n=2, South America n=2) were included. 86.5% (n=32) investigated participants' knowledge of medication disposal. Although there was a good level of awareness about the environmental impacts, there were significant gaps in knowledge regarding correct disposal methods, available services, guidelines and training. Thirty studies explored participants' attitudes towards medication disposal. There was a generally positive attitude towards the need for environmentally safe disposal practices. Thirty-five studies evaluated participants' practices in relation to medication disposal. Although there was generally a positive attitude and some understanding of appropriate disposal methods, the majority of the participants did not follow the practice guidelines, especially outside healthcare settings.

Discussions and conclusions: Although healthcare staff and students have fair knowledge and positive attitudes towards medicine disposal, their actual practices are lacking. One significant challenge identified is the limited awareness about proper disposal methods coupled with a lack of established services or guidelines. Even in cases where take-back programmes are available, they often face issues with accessibility. To tackle these challenges, it is suggested that governmental bodies should establish and enforce clear policies on medication disposal while also expanding educational initiatives to increase understanding among professionals and students. Furthermore, improving access to take-back programmes is crucial for ensuring safe medication disposal and minimising potential environmental and health hazards.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024503162.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医护人员和学生关于处置不需要的药物的知识、态度和做法:一项系统回顾。
目的:我们试图回顾有关医疗保健专业人员和学生关于药物处置的知识、态度和实践(KAP)的研究。我们还探讨了与适当的药物处置有关的建议和障碍。设计:遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行系统评价。数据来源:MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO和谷歌Scholar检索截止到2024年2月23日。研究资格标准和设置:定性、定量和混合方法的初步研究。没有对发表日期、地理位置或研究设置的限制。参与者:来自任何国家的药剂师、医生、护士和这些专业团体的学生。主要结局指标:医护人员和学生对处置不需要的药物的知晓程度。数据提取与合成:数据提取由四位研究者独立完成。研究细节被分为三个主要领域,即使用KAP模型的KAP。还提取了其他相关信息,并将其综合到总体主题中,例如挑战和建议。结果:纳入了来自18个国家的37项研究(亚洲n=21,美国n=7,非洲n=5,欧盟n=2,南美n=2)。86.5% (n=32)的受访者调查了受试者对药物处置的了解程度。虽然对环境影响有很高的认识,但是在正确的处置方法、现有的服务、准则和培训方面的知识有很大的差距。30项研究探讨了参与者对药物处置的态度。对于需要采用无害环境的处置办法,大家普遍持积极态度。35项研究评估了参与者在药物处置方面的做法。尽管总体上有积极的态度和对适当处理方法的一些理解,但大多数参与者没有遵循实践指南,特别是在医疗保健机构之外。讨论与结论:虽然医护人员和学生对药品处置有一定的认识和积极的态度,但缺乏实际操作。确定的一个重大挑战是对适当处置方法的认识有限,加上缺乏既定的服务或指导方针。即使在有回收方案的情况下,它们也常常面临可及性问题。为了应对这些挑战,建议政府机构应制定和执行明确的药物处置政策,同时扩大教育活动,以增加专业人员和学生之间的理解。此外,改善利用回收方案的机会对于确保安全处置药物和尽量减少潜在的环境和健康危害至关重要。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024503162。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Development and acceptability of a patient decision aid for people with degenerative cervical myelopathy: an international mixed-methods study. Alarm fatigue among critical care unit and emergency room nurses: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Iran. Going the distance: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis quantifying province-wide inequities in travel-based access, and fragility of access to French-language primary care provided by family physicians in Ontario, Canada. Multidimensional effects of virtual reality on motor dysfunction in patients who had a stroke: study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Synthetic data-augmented machine learning for 30-day readmission prediction in patients with chronic conditions: a retrospective real-world study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1