The use of autologous chondrocyte transplantation for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical trials.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Cell and Tissue Banking Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s10561-024-10154-z
Mohamad Y Fares, Mohammad Daher, Peter Boufadel, Emil Haikal, Tarek Haj Shehade, Jonathan Koa, Adam Z Khan, Joseph A Abboud
{"title":"The use of autologous chondrocyte transplantation for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical trials.","authors":"Mohamad Y Fares, Mohammad Daher, Peter Boufadel, Emil Haikal, Tarek Haj Shehade, Jonathan Koa, Adam Z Khan, Joseph A Abboud","doi":"10.1007/s10561-024-10154-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tissue engineering and cartilage transplantation constitute an evolving field in the treatment of osteoarthritis, with therapeutic and clinical promise shown in autologous chondrocyte implantation. The aim of this systematic review is to explore current clinical trials that utilized autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) and assess its efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Google-Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until February 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of clinical trials that involve autologous cartilage transplantation for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Clinical, imaging, arthroscopic, and histologic outcomes were assessed. A total of 15 clinical trials, involving 851 participants, were included in the study. All trials utilized ACT in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis through varying scaffolds: collagen-based (10 trials), polymer-based (2 trials), hyaluronic-acid based (2 trials), and spheroid technology (1 trial). Clinical improvement of patients undergoing ACT was noted in 14 trials; five showed superior clinical outcomes compared to the control group, while one showed inferiority compared to mesenchymal stem cells. Postoperative imaging was utilized to assess the degree of cartilage regeneration in 11 trials. Ten trials showed signs of cartilage recovery with ACT, four trials showed no difference, and two showed worse outcomes when compared to controls. Second-look-arthroscopy was performed in three trials, which reported varying degrees of improvement in cartilage regeneration. Histologic analysis was performed in four trials and generally showed promising results. While improved clinical outcomes were demonstrated, conflicting findings in postoperative outcome analysis raise questions about the unequivocal utility of ACT. Additional research with control groups, randomization, and appropriate blinding is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9723,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Tissue Banking","volume":"26 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Tissue Banking","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-024-10154-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tissue engineering and cartilage transplantation constitute an evolving field in the treatment of osteoarthritis, with therapeutic and clinical promise shown in autologous chondrocyte implantation. The aim of this systematic review is to explore current clinical trials that utilized autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) and assess its efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Google-Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until February 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of clinical trials that involve autologous cartilage transplantation for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Clinical, imaging, arthroscopic, and histologic outcomes were assessed. A total of 15 clinical trials, involving 851 participants, were included in the study. All trials utilized ACT in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis through varying scaffolds: collagen-based (10 trials), polymer-based (2 trials), hyaluronic-acid based (2 trials), and spheroid technology (1 trial). Clinical improvement of patients undergoing ACT was noted in 14 trials; five showed superior clinical outcomes compared to the control group, while one showed inferiority compared to mesenchymal stem cells. Postoperative imaging was utilized to assess the degree of cartilage regeneration in 11 trials. Ten trials showed signs of cartilage recovery with ACT, four trials showed no difference, and two showed worse outcomes when compared to controls. Second-look-arthroscopy was performed in three trials, which reported varying degrees of improvement in cartilage regeneration. Histologic analysis was performed in four trials and generally showed promising results. While improved clinical outcomes were demonstrated, conflicting findings in postoperative outcome analysis raise questions about the unequivocal utility of ACT. Additional research with control groups, randomization, and appropriate blinding is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自体软骨细胞移植治疗骨关节炎:临床试验的系统回顾。
组织工程和软骨移植是骨关节炎治疗中一个不断发展的领域,自体软骨细胞植入显示出治疗和临床前景。本系统综述的目的是探讨目前使用自体软骨细胞移植(ACT)的临床试验,并评估其治疗骨关节炎的疗效。PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE和Google-Scholar(页面1-20)的搜索截止到2023年2月。纳入标准包括涉及自体软骨移植治疗骨关节炎的临床试验。评估临床、影像学、关节镜和组织学结果。该研究共纳入了15项临床试验,涉及851名参与者。所有的试验都通过不同的支架使用ACT治疗膝关节骨关节炎:胶原基(10项试验)、聚合物基(2项试验)、透明质酸基(2项试验)和球体技术(1项试验)。14项试验指出,接受ACT治疗的患者的临床改善;5例临床结果优于对照组,1例临床结果低于间充质干细胞。11例试验采用术后影像学评估软骨再生程度。与对照组相比,10项试验显示ACT有软骨恢复的迹象,4项试验没有显示差异,2项试验的结果更差。在三个试验中进行了二次关节镜检查,报告了软骨再生的不同程度的改善。在四项试验中进行了组织学分析,并普遍显示出有希望的结果。虽然改善了临床结果,但在术后结果分析中相互矛盾的发现对ACT的明确效用提出了质疑。需要对对照组、随机分组和适当的盲法进行额外的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cell and Tissue Banking
Cell and Tissue Banking CELL BIOLOGY-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cell and Tissue Banking provides a forum for disseminating information to scientists and clinicians involved in the banking and transplantation of cells and tissues. Cell and Tissue Banking is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers in the following areas: basic research concerning general aspects of tissue banking such as quality assurance and control of banked cells/tissues, effects of preservation and sterilisation methods on cells/tissues, biotechnology, etc.; clinical applications of banked cells/tissues; standards of practice in procurement, processing, storage and distribution of cells/tissues; ethical issues; medico-legal issues.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of human amniotic membrane, tilapia skin collagen, and Centella asiatica derived gel to treat burn wound in rat model. Low-temperature vacuum evaporation as a novel dehydration process for the long-term preservation of transplantable human corneal tissue. Adipose MSCs response to breast cancer cell-derived factors in conditioned media and extracts. The use of autologous chondrocyte transplantation for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical trials. Development of a sterilization process for amniotic membrane allograft tissue using supercritical carbon dioxide and NovaKill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1