Broadening the conceptualization of panic disorder to include the fear presentation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: The legacy of panic control therapy

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behaviour Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104677
Hana F. Zickgraf, Rachel A. Schwartz
{"title":"Broadening the conceptualization of panic disorder to include the fear presentation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: The legacy of panic control therapy","authors":"Hana F. Zickgraf,&nbsp;Rachel A. Schwartz","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The presentation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) characterized by fear of aversive consequences of eating (<em>fear-ARFID</em>) has both phenomenological and mechanistic similarities to panic disorder. In this narrative review, we propose a shared model of the pathogenesis of the two disorders, centered on interoceptive sensitivity as the key maintenance mechanism. We review the evidence that fear-ARFID, which involves restrictive eating motivated by a desire to avoid aversive events (e.g., choking, vomiting, abdominal pain) related to the gastrointestinal tract, onsets with an unexpected event and develops through catastrophic misinterpretation of the probability or significance of the event reoccurring, heightened awareness of minor interoceptive sensations associated with the feared event (i.e., interoceptive sensitivity), escalating anxiety and increasingly frequent experience of minor interoceptive sensations, and increasingly extensive avoidant behavior. Given the support for shared maintenance mechanisms with panic disorder, we suggest a program of clinical research evaluating the adaptation of elements of Panic Control Therapy (PCT), a well-established empirically supported treatment for panic disorder, to treat fear-ARFID. Developing and testing new intervention strategies based on PCT could expand ARFID patients’ access to appropriate care by enabling anxiety-experienced clinicians to use their existing competencies to treat fear-ARFID using a disorder-specific evidence-based treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 104677"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724002043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presentation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) characterized by fear of aversive consequences of eating (fear-ARFID) has both phenomenological and mechanistic similarities to panic disorder. In this narrative review, we propose a shared model of the pathogenesis of the two disorders, centered on interoceptive sensitivity as the key maintenance mechanism. We review the evidence that fear-ARFID, which involves restrictive eating motivated by a desire to avoid aversive events (e.g., choking, vomiting, abdominal pain) related to the gastrointestinal tract, onsets with an unexpected event and develops through catastrophic misinterpretation of the probability or significance of the event reoccurring, heightened awareness of minor interoceptive sensations associated with the feared event (i.e., interoceptive sensitivity), escalating anxiety and increasingly frequent experience of minor interoceptive sensations, and increasingly extensive avoidant behavior. Given the support for shared maintenance mechanisms with panic disorder, we suggest a program of clinical research evaluating the adaptation of elements of Panic Control Therapy (PCT), a well-established empirically supported treatment for panic disorder, to treat fear-ARFID. Developing and testing new intervention strategies based on PCT could expand ARFID patients’ access to appropriate care by enabling anxiety-experienced clinicians to use their existing competencies to treat fear-ARFID using a disorder-specific evidence-based treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩大恐慌障碍的概念,包括回避/限制性食物摄入障碍的恐惧表现:恐慌控制疗法的遗产。
以害怕进食的不良后果为特征的回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)的表现与惊恐障碍在现象和机制上都有相似之处。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们提出了两种疾病的共同发病机制模型,以内感受性敏感性为中心,作为关键的维持机制。我们回顾了恐惧- arfid的证据,其中包括由避免与胃肠道相关的厌恶事件(例如,窒息,呕吐,腹痛)的愿望引起的限制性饮食,发作于意外事件,并通过对事件再次发生的可能性或重要性的灾难性误解发展,提高与恐惧事件相关的次要内感受的意识(即,内感受敏感性),不断升级的焦虑和越来越频繁的轻微内感受体验,以及越来越广泛的回避行为。鉴于对惊恐障碍共享维持机制的支持,我们建议一个临床研究项目,评估惊恐控制疗法(PCT)元素的适应性,这是一种成熟的经验支持的惊恐障碍治疗方法,用于治疗恐惧- arfid。开发和测试基于PCT的新干预策略,可以使有焦虑经验的临床医生利用他们现有的能力,使用针对特定疾病的循证治疗来治疗恐惧-ARFID,从而扩大ARFID患者获得适当护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Diverging paths: Modeling the relation between adverse effects, attitudes, perceived adherence, and treatment effect in an internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for obsessive-compulsive disorder Broadening the conceptualization of panic disorder to include the fear presentation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: The legacy of panic control therapy The renewal reducing effect of unpaired unconditional stimuli presented during extinction is not specific to the unconditional stimulus used during acquisition Accelerometer-based sedentary time and physical activity with incident and progressive tobacco smoking in 2503 children: A 13-year mediation and temporal longitudinal study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1