Optimizing recovery in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review of psychosocial interventions.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.017
Madisen T Russell, Imani S Linton, Jenifer L Vohs, Kyle S Minor
{"title":"Optimizing recovery in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review of psychosocial interventions.","authors":"Madisen T Russell, Imani S Linton, Jenifer L Vohs, Kyle S Minor","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) across multiple recovery outcomes. Drawing from 35 studies, the analysis synthesizes evidence on symptom reduction, social and role functioning improvement, continuity of care, hospitalization rates, and other psychological outcomes. Regarding symptom reduction, specialized FEP programs demonstrated decreases across positive, negative, and general symptoms. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) interventions also showed promise in improving psychiatric symptoms, while skills training interventions were effective in enhancing positive and negative symptoms. Social and role functioning improvements were observed across different interventions, including specialized FEP care and vocational support. Furthermore, specialized FEP programs generally led to reduced hospitalization rates and improved continuity of care, while CBT and other interventions improved psychological outcomes, such as enhanced coping skills and cognitive functioning. Most studies, particularly those of higher quality, reported positive outcomes across multiple domains. Future research should prioritize comparative efficacy, intervention duration and modality effects, and address disparities in access and utilization of FEP interventions across diverse contexts. By advancing our understanding of effective psychosocial interventions for FEP, this review offers valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers aiming to optimize outcomes and mitigate the burden of psychosis-related disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"275 ","pages":"166-178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) across multiple recovery outcomes. Drawing from 35 studies, the analysis synthesizes evidence on symptom reduction, social and role functioning improvement, continuity of care, hospitalization rates, and other psychological outcomes. Regarding symptom reduction, specialized FEP programs demonstrated decreases across positive, negative, and general symptoms. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) interventions also showed promise in improving psychiatric symptoms, while skills training interventions were effective in enhancing positive and negative symptoms. Social and role functioning improvements were observed across different interventions, including specialized FEP care and vocational support. Furthermore, specialized FEP programs generally led to reduced hospitalization rates and improved continuity of care, while CBT and other interventions improved psychological outcomes, such as enhanced coping skills and cognitive functioning. Most studies, particularly those of higher quality, reported positive outcomes across multiple domains. Future research should prioritize comparative efficacy, intervention duration and modality effects, and address disparities in access and utilization of FEP interventions across diverse contexts. By advancing our understanding of effective psychosocial interventions for FEP, this review offers valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers aiming to optimize outcomes and mitigate the burden of psychosis-related disabilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化首发精神病的康复:社会心理干预的系统回顾。
本系统综述评估了心理社会干预对经历首发精神病(FEP)的个体在多个康复结果中的效果。根据35项研究,该分析综合了有关症状减轻、社会和角色功能改善、护理连续性、住院率和其他心理结果的证据。关于症状减轻,专门的FEP方案证明了阳性、阴性和一般症状的减轻。认知行为疗法(CBT)干预也显示出改善精神症状的希望,而技能训练干预在增强阳性和阴性症状方面都是有效的。在不同的干预措施中,包括专门的FEP护理和职业支持,观察到社会和角色功能的改善。此外,专门的FEP项目通常降低了住院率,改善了护理的连续性,而CBT和其他干预措施改善了心理结果,如增强了应对技能和认知功能。大多数研究,特别是那些高质量的研究,报告了多个领域的积极结果。未来的研究应优先考虑比较疗效、干预持续时间和模式效应,并解决不同背景下FEP干预措施的获取和利用差异。通过加深我们对FEP的有效心理社会干预的理解,本综述为临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者提供了有价值的见解,旨在优化结果并减轻精神病相关残疾的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Research
Schizophrenia Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership! Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue. The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the relationship between personality dimensions and psychosis-specific clinical characteristics. Emotional intelligence as a predictor of functional outcomes in psychotic disorders. Ambient coarse particulate matter pollution and hospital admissions for schizophrenia. Positive mental health interventions for people with schizophrenia: A scoping review. Systematic review and meta-analysis of family-based interventions for early psychosis: Carer and patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1