Factor structure of social cognition in schizophrenia: Investigation of four core domains

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2025.02.006
Ryotaro Kubota , Takashi Uchino , Ryo Okubo , Hisashi Akiyama , Hiroki Okano , Yuji Yamada , Takefumi Suzuki , Takahiro Nemoto , Naoki Hashimoto , Satoru Ikezawa
{"title":"Factor structure of social cognition in schizophrenia: Investigation of four core domains","authors":"Ryotaro Kubota ,&nbsp;Takashi Uchino ,&nbsp;Ryo Okubo ,&nbsp;Hisashi Akiyama ,&nbsp;Hiroki Okano ,&nbsp;Yuji Yamada ,&nbsp;Takefumi Suzuki ,&nbsp;Takahiro Nemoto ,&nbsp;Naoki Hashimoto ,&nbsp;Satoru Ikezawa","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Experts have categorized social cognition in schizophrenia into four domains: theory of mind, emotion processing, social perception, and attributional bias. However, previous factor analyses based on this categorization have yielded inconsistent results, likely because some domains were inadequately represented due to a lack of available measures. To address this issue, we conducted a factor analysis using a set of validated measures encompassing all four domains.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The individual domains of social cognition were assessed in clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia (<em>n</em> = 136) using the Hinting task, Metaphor and Sarcasm Scenario Test, the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task, Facial Emotion Selection Test, the Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice, and the Ambiguous Intentions and Hostility Questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to determine the factor structure. Additionally, correlation analysis (<em>n</em> = 123) was performed to examine the relationships between the identified factors and clinical variables, such as psychiatric symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exploratory factor analysis identified a two-factor structure for social cognition: “social cognitive skills”, which includes theory of mind, emotion processing, and social perception; and “social cognitive bias”, which includes attributional bias. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit indices. Correlation analysis revealed that social cognitive skills were associated with positive, negative, and disorganized symptoms, neurocognition, and social functioning, while social cognitive bias was related to excitement, depression, and defeatist beliefs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of this study suggest that social cognition can be divided into two distinct factors and provide guidance for developing treatment strategies aimed at improving social cognition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"278 ","pages":"Pages 26-34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996425000441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Experts have categorized social cognition in schizophrenia into four domains: theory of mind, emotion processing, social perception, and attributional bias. However, previous factor analyses based on this categorization have yielded inconsistent results, likely because some domains were inadequately represented due to a lack of available measures. To address this issue, we conducted a factor analysis using a set of validated measures encompassing all four domains.

Methods

The individual domains of social cognition were assessed in clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia (n = 136) using the Hinting task, Metaphor and Sarcasm Scenario Test, the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task, Facial Emotion Selection Test, the Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice, and the Ambiguous Intentions and Hostility Questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to determine the factor structure. Additionally, correlation analysis (n = 123) was performed to examine the relationships between the identified factors and clinical variables, such as psychiatric symptoms.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis identified a two-factor structure for social cognition: “social cognitive skills”, which includes theory of mind, emotion processing, and social perception; and “social cognitive bias”, which includes attributional bias. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit indices. Correlation analysis revealed that social cognitive skills were associated with positive, negative, and disorganized symptoms, neurocognition, and social functioning, while social cognitive bias was related to excitement, depression, and defeatist beliefs.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that social cognition can be divided into two distinct factors and provide guidance for developing treatment strategies aimed at improving social cognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症患者社会认知的因素结构:四个核心领域的调查
专家们将精神分裂症患者的社会认知分为四个领域:心理理论、情绪加工、社会知觉和归因偏见。然而,先前基于这种分类的因素分析产生了不一致的结果,可能是因为一些领域由于缺乏可用的措施而没有充分代表。为了解决这个问题,我们使用一组包含所有四个领域的有效措施进行了因素分析。方法采用暗示任务、隐喻与讽刺情景测试、Bell Lysaker情绪识别任务、面部情绪选择测试、社会归因任务-多项选择和模糊意图与敌意问卷对136例临床稳定的精神分裂症门诊患者进行社会认知的个体领域评估。通过探索性和验证性因素分析来确定因素结构。此外,还进行了相关分析(n = 123),以检查所识别的因素与临床变量(如精神症状)之间的关系。结果探索性因子分析发现社会认知存在双因素结构:“社会认知技能”,包括心理理论、情绪加工和社会知觉;还有“社会认知偏差”其中包括归因偏差。验证性因子分析显示拟合指标较好。相关分析显示,社会认知技能与积极、消极、无序症状、神经认知和社会功能相关,而社会认知偏见与兴奋、抑郁和失败主义信念相关。结论本研究结果提示社会认知可以分为两个不同的因素,并为制定旨在改善社会认知的治疗策略提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Research
Schizophrenia Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership! Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue. The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.
期刊最新文献
Association between Toxoplasma gondii IgG seropositivity and schizophrenia: A case-control study in Colombia Schizoaffective disorder - A conglomerated disorder that needs an amalgamation of ideas Low incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms following treatment with a muscarinic agonist medication for schizophrenia Psychedelics for treatment of negative symptoms and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorder: A narrative review Motor activity-based prediction of the presence of apathy in schizophrenia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1