Ultrasound transducer disinfection for percutaneous procedures: A review of the evidence supporting guideline recommendations.

Q3 Medicine Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1002/ajum.12408
Nathan Peters, Frances Williamson, Victoria Eley
{"title":"Ultrasound transducer disinfection for percutaneous procedures: A review of the evidence supporting guideline recommendations.","authors":"Nathan Peters, Frances Williamson, Victoria Eley","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/purpose: </strong>There are varying international recommendations regarding the minimum level of disinfection required for ultrasound transducers used in percutaneous procedures. While some guidelines recommend high-level disinfection (HLD), others question the additional benefit this delivers over low-level disinfection (LLD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review identifies current guidelines and evaluates the evidence used to support disinfection recommendations for ultrasound transducers used in percutaneous procedures. Thirteen guidelines were identified using a search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google from 1st January 2013 to 31st January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No guidelines were supported by high-quality evidence, instead, guidelines relied upon: expert opinion through the application of national standards and infection control principles; consideration of recommendations from other published guidelines; and the incidence of infection from retrospective studies. Guidelines were uniformly supportive of using ultrasound transducer covers and sterile ultrasound gel during ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures. However, the minimum recommended disinfection level was varied with seven guidelines recommending HLD, four LLD and two not specifying a level. Spaulding's classification was commonly used to support disinfection recommendations, however, the resultant wide variation in classification and subsequent recommendations suggest that its utility in accurately determining the minimum level of disinfection in this specific context is low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Without high-level evidence, using a risk-based assessment will likely remain fundamental to future guideline recommendations in determining the minimum disinfection level for an ultrasound transducer used in percutaneous procedures. This risk assessment must include the highest level of evidence available in addition to acknowledging the contribution of all steps taken to prevent infection during ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"27 4","pages":"242-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/purpose: There are varying international recommendations regarding the minimum level of disinfection required for ultrasound transducers used in percutaneous procedures. While some guidelines recommend high-level disinfection (HLD), others question the additional benefit this delivers over low-level disinfection (LLD).

Methods: This narrative review identifies current guidelines and evaluates the evidence used to support disinfection recommendations for ultrasound transducers used in percutaneous procedures. Thirteen guidelines were identified using a search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google from 1st January 2013 to 31st January 2024.

Results: No guidelines were supported by high-quality evidence, instead, guidelines relied upon: expert opinion through the application of national standards and infection control principles; consideration of recommendations from other published guidelines; and the incidence of infection from retrospective studies. Guidelines were uniformly supportive of using ultrasound transducer covers and sterile ultrasound gel during ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures. However, the minimum recommended disinfection level was varied with seven guidelines recommending HLD, four LLD and two not specifying a level. Spaulding's classification was commonly used to support disinfection recommendations, however, the resultant wide variation in classification and subsequent recommendations suggest that its utility in accurately determining the minimum level of disinfection in this specific context is low.

Conclusion: Without high-level evidence, using a risk-based assessment will likely remain fundamental to future guideline recommendations in determining the minimum disinfection level for an ultrasound transducer used in percutaneous procedures. This risk assessment must include the highest level of evidence available in addition to acknowledging the contribution of all steps taken to prevent infection during ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮手术用超声换能器消毒:支持指南建议的证据综述
介绍/目的:关于经皮手术中使用的超声换能器所需的最低消毒水平,国际上有不同的建议。虽然一些指南建议采用高水平消毒(HLD),但也有人质疑这种方法比低水平消毒(LLD)带来的额外好处。方法:这篇叙述性综述确定了目前的指南,并评估了用于支持经皮手术中使用的超声换能器消毒建议的证据。从2013年1月1日至2024年1月31日,通过检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和谷歌,确定了13份指南。结果:指南没有高质量的证据支持,指南依赖于专家意见,通过应用国家标准和感染控制原则;审议其他已公布的准则的建议;以及回顾性研究中感染的发生率。指南一致支持在超声引导的经皮手术中使用超声换能器盖和无菌超声凝胶。然而,建议的最低消毒水平各不相同,有7项指南建议使用HLD, 4项建议使用LLD,还有2项没有指定消毒水平。斯波尔丁的分类通常用于支持消毒建议,然而,由此产生的分类和随后的建议的广泛差异表明,在这种特定情况下,它在准确确定最低消毒水平方面的效用很低。结论:在没有高水平证据的情况下,在确定经皮手术中使用的超声换能器的最低消毒水平时,使用基于风险的评估可能仍然是未来指南建议的基础。这种风险评估必须包括现有的最高水平的证据,除了承认在超声引导的经皮手术中预防感染所采取的所有步骤的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Application of the 2023 World Heart Federation guidelines for the echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease. Ultrasonographic view of fluid bronchogram secondary to endobronchial obstruction: A case report. Anatomy - The foundation of ultrasound imaging. Identifying enablers and barriers to teleultrasound use for remote settings: A scoping review. Ultrasound evaluation of peripheral intravenous catheter thrombus formation associated with intravenous flucloxacillin administration: A prospective observational pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1