Using apparent diffusion coefficient maps and radiomics to predict pathological grade in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01540-w
Rile Nai, Kexin Wang, Shuai Ma, Zuqiang Xi, Yaofeng Zhang, Xiaodong Zhang, Xiaoying Wang
{"title":"Using apparent diffusion coefficient maps and radiomics to predict pathological grade in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.","authors":"Rile Nai, Kexin Wang, Shuai Ma, Zuqiang Xi, Yaofeng Zhang, Xiaodong Zhang, Xiaoying Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01540-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been reported as a quantitative biomarker for assessing the aggressiveness of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but it has typically been used only with mean ADC values. This study aims to develop a radiomics model using ADC maps to differentiate UTUC grades by incorporating texture features and to compare its performance with that of mean ADC values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 215 patients with histopathologically confirmed UTUC were enrolled retrospectively and divided into training and test sets. The optimum cutoff value for the mean ADC was derived using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiomics features based on ADC maps were extracted and screened, and then a radiomics model was constructed. Both mean ADC values and the radiomics model were tested on the training and test sets. ROC curve and DeLong test were used to assess the diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The training set consisted of 151 patients (median age: 68.0, IQR: [63.0, 75.0] years; 80 males), whereas the test set consisted of 64 patients (median age: 68.0, IQR: [61.0, 72.3] years; 31 males). The ADC values were significantly lower in high-grade versus low-grade UTUC (1310 × 10<sup>- 6</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 1480 × 10<sup>- 6</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>/s, p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) values of the mean ADC values in the training and test sets were 0.698 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.625-0.772] and 0.628 [95% CI: 0.474-0.782], respectively. Compared with the mean ADC values, the ADC-based radiomics model, which incorporates features such as log-sigma-1-0-mm-3D_glcm_ClusterProminence and wavelet-LLL_firstorder_10Percentile, obtained a significantly greater AUC in the training set (AUC: 1.000, 95% CI: 1.000-1.000, p < 0.001), and a trend towards statistical significance in the test set (AUC: 0.786, 95% CI: 0.651-0.921, p = 0.071).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ADC-based radiomics model showed promising potential in predicting the pathological grade of UTUC, outperforming the mean ADC values in classification accuracy. Further studies with larger sample sizes and external validation are necessary to confirm its clinical utility and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01540-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been reported as a quantitative biomarker for assessing the aggressiveness of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but it has typically been used only with mean ADC values. This study aims to develop a radiomics model using ADC maps to differentiate UTUC grades by incorporating texture features and to compare its performance with that of mean ADC values.

Methods: A total of 215 patients with histopathologically confirmed UTUC were enrolled retrospectively and divided into training and test sets. The optimum cutoff value for the mean ADC was derived using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiomics features based on ADC maps were extracted and screened, and then a radiomics model was constructed. Both mean ADC values and the radiomics model were tested on the training and test sets. ROC curve and DeLong test were used to assess the diagnostic performance.

Results: The training set consisted of 151 patients (median age: 68.0, IQR: [63.0, 75.0] years; 80 males), whereas the test set consisted of 64 patients (median age: 68.0, IQR: [61.0, 72.3] years; 31 males). The ADC values were significantly lower in high-grade versus low-grade UTUC (1310 × 10- 6mm2/s vs. 1480 × 10- 6mm2/s, p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) values of the mean ADC values in the training and test sets were 0.698 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.625-0.772] and 0.628 [95% CI: 0.474-0.782], respectively. Compared with the mean ADC values, the ADC-based radiomics model, which incorporates features such as log-sigma-1-0-mm-3D_glcm_ClusterProminence and wavelet-LLL_firstorder_10Percentile, obtained a significantly greater AUC in the training set (AUC: 1.000, 95% CI: 1.000-1.000, p < 0.001), and a trend towards statistical significance in the test set (AUC: 0.786, 95% CI: 0.651-0.921, p = 0.071).

Conclusions: The ADC-based radiomics model showed promising potential in predicting the pathological grade of UTUC, outperforming the mean ADC values in classification accuracy. Further studies with larger sample sizes and external validation are necessary to confirm its clinical utility and generalizability.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用表观扩散系数图和放射组学预测上尿路尿路上皮癌的病理分级。
背景:表观扩散系数(ADC)已被报道为评估上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)侵袭性的定量生物标志物,但它通常仅用于平均ADC值。本研究旨在利用ADC图开发一个放射组学模型,通过结合纹理特征来区分UTUC等级,并将其性能与平均ADC值进行比较。方法:回顾性纳入组织病理学证实的UTUC患者215例,分为训练组和测试组。利用接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线推导出平均ADC的最佳截止值。提取并筛选基于ADC图的放射组学特征,构建放射组学模型。在训练集和测试集上对平均ADC值和放射组学模型进行了测试。采用ROC曲线和DeLong检验评价诊断效能。结果:训练集包括151例患者(中位年龄:68.0,IQR:[63.0, 75.0]岁;80例男性),而测试集由64例患者组成(中位年龄:68.0,IQR:[61.0, 72.3]岁;31岁男性)。高级别UTUC的ADC值明显低于低级别UTUC (1310 × 10- 6mm2/s vs. 1480 × 10- 6mm2/s)。结论:基于ADC的放射组学模型在预测UTUC病理分级方面具有良好的潜力,在分类准确性方面优于平均ADC值。进一步的研究需要更大的样本量和外部验证来证实其临床应用和推广。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
A GNSS/INS Integrated Navigation Algorithm Based on Kalman Filter
IF 0 IFAC-PapersOnLinePub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.151
Guangqi Wang , Yu Han , Jian Chen , Shubo Wang , Zichao Zhang , Nannan Du , Yongjun Zheng
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Automated segmentation of brain metastases in T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images pre and post stereotactic radiosurgery. Accuracy of ultrasonographic transcerebellar diameter for dating in third trimester of pregnancy in Nigerian women: a cross-sectional study. Structured reporting of gliomas based on VASARI criteria to improve report content and consistency. The correlation analysis between Normalized Wall Index and cerebral perfusion in patients with Mild Carotid Artery Stenosis under 3.0T MRI. Enhanced tuberculosis detection using Vision Transformers and explainable AI with a Grad-CAM approach on chest X-rays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1