Measuring visual ability in linguistically diverse populations.

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02579-x
Madison A Hooper, Andrew Tomarken, Isabel Gauthier
{"title":"Measuring visual ability in linguistically diverse populations.","authors":"Madison A Hooper, Andrew Tomarken, Isabel Gauthier","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02579-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement of object recognition (OR) ability could predict learning and success in real-world settings, and there is hope that it may reduce bias often observed in cognitive tests. Although the measurement of visual OR is not expected to be influenced by the language of participants or the language of instructions, these assumptions remain largely untested. Here, we address the challenges of measuring OR abilities across linguistically diverse populations. In Study 1, we find that English-Spanish bilinguals, when randomly assigned to the English or Spanish version of the novel object memory test (NOMT), exhibit a highly similar overall performance. Study 2 extends this by assessing psychometric equivalence using an approach grounded in item response theory (IRT). We examined whether groups fluent in English or Spanish differed in (a) latent OR ability as assessed by a three-parameter logistic IRT model, and (2) the mapping of observed item responses on the latent OR construct, as assessed by differential item functioning (DIF) analyses. Spanish speakers performed better than English speakers, a difference we suggest is due to motivational differences between groups of vastly different size on the Prolific platform. That we found no substantial DIF between the groups tested in English or Spanish on the NOMT indicates measurement invariance. The feasibility of increasing diversity by combining groups tested in different languages remains unexplored. Adopting this approach could enable visual scientists to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion in their research, and potentially in the broader application of their work in society.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02579-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of object recognition (OR) ability could predict learning and success in real-world settings, and there is hope that it may reduce bias often observed in cognitive tests. Although the measurement of visual OR is not expected to be influenced by the language of participants or the language of instructions, these assumptions remain largely untested. Here, we address the challenges of measuring OR abilities across linguistically diverse populations. In Study 1, we find that English-Spanish bilinguals, when randomly assigned to the English or Spanish version of the novel object memory test (NOMT), exhibit a highly similar overall performance. Study 2 extends this by assessing psychometric equivalence using an approach grounded in item response theory (IRT). We examined whether groups fluent in English or Spanish differed in (a) latent OR ability as assessed by a three-parameter logistic IRT model, and (2) the mapping of observed item responses on the latent OR construct, as assessed by differential item functioning (DIF) analyses. Spanish speakers performed better than English speakers, a difference we suggest is due to motivational differences between groups of vastly different size on the Prolific platform. That we found no substantial DIF between the groups tested in English or Spanish on the NOMT indicates measurement invariance. The feasibility of increasing diversity by combining groups tested in different languages remains unexplored. Adopting this approach could enable visual scientists to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion in their research, and potentially in the broader application of their work in society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量不同语言人群的视觉能力。
物体识别(OR)能力的测量可以预测现实环境中的学习和成功,并且有希望减少在认知测试中经常观察到的偏见。虽然视觉OR的测量不受参与者语言或指令语言的影响,但这些假设在很大程度上仍未经检验。在这里,我们解决了在不同语言人群中测量OR能力的挑战。在研究1中,我们发现,当被随机分配到英语或西班牙语版本的新对象记忆测试(NOMT)时,英语-西班牙语双语者表现出高度相似的整体表现。研究2通过使用基于项目反应理论(IRT)的方法评估心理测量等效性来扩展这一研究。我们检验了英语流利组和西班牙语流利组在以下方面是否存在差异:(a)通过三参数logistic IRT模型评估潜在or能力,以及(2)通过差异项目功能(DIF)分析评估观察到的项目反应在潜在or结构上的映射。说西班牙语的人比说英语的人表现得更好,我们认为这种差异是由于多产平台上不同规模的群体之间的动机差异造成的。我们发现在英语和西班牙语的NOMT测试组之间没有实质性的差异表明测量不变性。通过组合不同语言测试的群体来增加多样性的可行性仍未得到探索。采用这种方法可以使视觉科学家在他们的研究中增强多样性、公平性和包容性,并有可能使他们的工作在社会上得到更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Testing for group differences in multilevel vector autoregressive models. Distribution-free Bayesian analyses with the DFBA statistical package. Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages. Open-access network science: Investigating phonological similarity networks based on the SUBTLEX-US lexicon. Survey measures of metacognitive monitoring are often false.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1