Priority attribute algorithm for Q-matrix validation: A didactic.

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02547-5
Haijiang Qin, Lei Guo
{"title":"Priority attribute algorithm for Q-matrix validation: A didactic.","authors":"Haijiang Qin, Lei Guo","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02547-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Q-matrix is one of the core components of cognitive diagnostic assessment, which is a matrix describing the relationship between items and the attributes being assessed. Numerous studies have shown that inaccuracies in defining the Q-matrix can degrade parameter estimation and model fitting results. Currently, Q-matrix validation often involves exhaustive search algorithms (ESA), which traverse through all possible <math><mi>q</mi></math> -vectors and determine the optimal <math><mi>q</mi></math> -vector for items based on indicators or criteria corresponding to different validation methods. However, ESA methods are time-consuming, especially when the number of attributes is large, as the search complexity grows exponentially. This study proposes a more efficient search algorithm, the priority attribute algorithm (PAA), which conducts searches one by one according to the priority of attributes, greatly simplifying the search process. Simulation studies indicate that PAA can significantly enhance search efficiency while maintaining the same or even higher accuracy than ESA, particularly when dealing with a large number of attributes. Moreover, the Q-matrix validation method employing PAA demonstrates better applicability to small samples. A real-data analysis indicates that applying the PAA-based Q-matrix validation method may yield suggested Q-matrices with higher model-data fit and greater practical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02547-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Q-matrix is one of the core components of cognitive diagnostic assessment, which is a matrix describing the relationship between items and the attributes being assessed. Numerous studies have shown that inaccuracies in defining the Q-matrix can degrade parameter estimation and model fitting results. Currently, Q-matrix validation often involves exhaustive search algorithms (ESA), which traverse through all possible q -vectors and determine the optimal q -vector for items based on indicators or criteria corresponding to different validation methods. However, ESA methods are time-consuming, especially when the number of attributes is large, as the search complexity grows exponentially. This study proposes a more efficient search algorithm, the priority attribute algorithm (PAA), which conducts searches one by one according to the priority of attributes, greatly simplifying the search process. Simulation studies indicate that PAA can significantly enhance search efficiency while maintaining the same or even higher accuracy than ESA, particularly when dealing with a large number of attributes. Moreover, the Q-matrix validation method employing PAA demonstrates better applicability to small samples. A real-data analysis indicates that applying the PAA-based Q-matrix validation method may yield suggested Q-matrices with higher model-data fit and greater practical utility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
q矩阵验证的优先属性算法:教学。
q矩阵是认知诊断评估的核心组成部分之一,它是描述项目与被评估属性之间关系的矩阵。大量研究表明,定义q矩阵的不准确会降低参数估计和模型拟合的结果。目前,q矩阵验证通常涉及穷举搜索算法(ESA),该算法遍历所有可能的q -向量,并根据不同验证方法对应的指标或标准确定项目的最优q -向量。然而,随着搜索复杂度呈指数级增长,ESA方法耗时较长,特别是当属性数量较大时。本研究提出了一种更高效的搜索算法——优先属性算法(PAA),该算法根据属性的优先级进行逐个搜索,大大简化了搜索过程。仿真研究表明,PAA可以显著提高搜索效率,同时保持与ESA相同甚至更高的精度,特别是在处理大量属性时。此外,采用PAA的q矩阵验证方法对小样本具有更好的适用性。实际数据分析表明,应用基于聚丙烯酸的q矩阵验证方法可以得到具有较高模型数据拟合性和更大实用价值的建议q矩阵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Testing for group differences in multilevel vector autoregressive models. Distribution-free Bayesian analyses with the DFBA statistical package. Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages. Open-access network science: Investigating phonological similarity networks based on the SUBTLEX-US lexicon. Survey measures of metacognitive monitoring are often false.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1