Nurses' perspectives on assisted suicide: Challenges and support needs

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117663
Elisabeth L. Zeilinger , Tamina-Laetitia Vielgrader , Arzu Petersen , Alexa L. Meyer , Nadine Brunevskaya , Matthias Unseld
{"title":"Nurses' perspectives on assisted suicide: Challenges and support needs","authors":"Elisabeth L. Zeilinger ,&nbsp;Tamina-Laetitia Vielgrader ,&nbsp;Arzu Petersen ,&nbsp;Alexa L. Meyer ,&nbsp;Nadine Brunevskaya ,&nbsp;Matthias Unseld","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Assisted suicide, also known as physician-assisted death, remains a contentious issue for healthcare providers, involving medical ethics, legal frameworks, and individual rights. This study aims to explore the attitudes, experiences, and training needs of nurses in Austria following the legalization of assisted suicide in 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Utilizing a cross-sectional online survey, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 280 palliative and hospice care nurses across all nine Austrian states.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Approximately a quarter of nurses experienced a shift in their attitudes towards assisted suicide during the first year of its legalization. While a majority felt their wellbeing was unaffected, 14.5% reported a decline in mental health due to the new law. Despite both mandatory and optional training being provided by employers, 80.7% of nurses expressed a need for further education, particularly on legal and organizational aspects, practical case studies, and interdisciplinary communication. Qualitative analysis revealed diverse perspectives, with some nurses advocating for patient autonomy and empathetic support, while others preferred enhancing palliative care as an alternative to assisted suicide. Furthermore, nurses highlighted the necessity for a clear legal framework and collaborative decision-making processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study underscores the critical role of comprehensive palliative care and calls for more clarity around appropriate assisted suicide practices. Ongoing dialogue, enhanced training, and support for nurses to navigate both ethical and practical challenges posed by assisted suicide legislation is also needed. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions and explore the long-term impacts of assisted suicide on patients, their families, and healthcare providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117663"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Assisted suicide, also known as physician-assisted death, remains a contentious issue for healthcare providers, involving medical ethics, legal frameworks, and individual rights. This study aims to explore the attitudes, experiences, and training needs of nurses in Austria following the legalization of assisted suicide in 2022.

Methods

Utilizing a cross-sectional online survey, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 280 palliative and hospice care nurses across all nine Austrian states.

Results

Approximately a quarter of nurses experienced a shift in their attitudes towards assisted suicide during the first year of its legalization. While a majority felt their wellbeing was unaffected, 14.5% reported a decline in mental health due to the new law. Despite both mandatory and optional training being provided by employers, 80.7% of nurses expressed a need for further education, particularly on legal and organizational aspects, practical case studies, and interdisciplinary communication. Qualitative analysis revealed diverse perspectives, with some nurses advocating for patient autonomy and empathetic support, while others preferred enhancing palliative care as an alternative to assisted suicide. Furthermore, nurses highlighted the necessity for a clear legal framework and collaborative decision-making processes.

Conclusion

The study underscores the critical role of comprehensive palliative care and calls for more clarity around appropriate assisted suicide practices. Ongoing dialogue, enhanced training, and support for nurses to navigate both ethical and practical challenges posed by assisted suicide legislation is also needed. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions and explore the long-term impacts of assisted suicide on patients, their families, and healthcare providers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对协助自杀的看法:挑战和支持需求。
背景:协助自杀,也被称为医生协助死亡,仍然是一个有争议的问题,医疗服务提供者,涉及医疗伦理,法律框架和个人权利。本研究旨在探讨奥地利在2022年协助自杀合法化后护士的态度、经验和培训需求。方法:采用横断面在线调查,从奥地利九个州的280名姑息治疗和临终关怀护士中收集定量和定性数据。结果:在协助自杀合法化的第一年,大约四分之一的护士对协助自杀的态度发生了转变。虽然大多数人认为他们的健康状况没有受到影响,但14.5%的人表示,由于新法律,他们的心理健康状况有所下降。尽管雇主提供了强制性和可选性培训,但80.7%的护士表示需要继续接受教育,特别是在法律和组织方面、实际案例研究和跨学科沟通方面。定性分析揭示了不同的观点,一些护士主张患者自主和同情支持,而另一些则倾向于加强姑息治疗作为辅助自杀的替代方案。此外,护士强调了建立明确的法律框架和协作决策过程的必要性。结论:该研究强调了综合姑息治疗的关键作用,并呼吁在适当的辅助自杀实践中更加明确。还需要进行持续的对话,加强培训,并支持护士应对协助自杀立法所带来的道德和实际挑战。未来的研究应评估这些干预措施的有效性,并探讨协助自杀对患者、家属和医疗服务提供者的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Broadening the lens: a commentary on Sheard and Cauana-Finkel's account of women's progress in UK academic health economics' [Soc. Sci. Med. 382, October 2025, 118411]. Corrigendum to 'Association of socioeconomic inequality in cardiovascular disease risk with economic development across 57 low- and middle-income countries: Cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative individual-level data' [Soc. Sci. Med. 365, January 2025, 117591]. Family income trajectories and adverse outcomes in late adolescence: Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Corrigendum to 'Sauna culture improves physical and mental wellbeing in the UK through social connection and ritual' [Soc. Sci. Med. 394, April 2026, 119061]. Between hospital and home: Hospital-adjacent neighborhood as a third therapeutic place for China's long-distance patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1