Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Limb Dysfunction after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002694
Wen-Fang Liu, Shuang-Mei Zhang
{"title":"Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Limb Dysfunction after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Wen-Fang Liu, Shuang-Mei Zhang","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a novel and noninvasive approach for alleviating spasticity and pain, improving motor dysfunction after stroke. To determine the effectiveness of ESWT and the effects of shock wave parameters in relieving spasticity, pain, and motor dysfunction following stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EBSCOhost, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials on ESWT for limb dysfunction after stroke from inception until February 1, 2023. Two researchers independently searched and screened articles identified from each database, used RevMan v.5.4 analyzing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included nine articles and 327 patients. ESWT improved the spasticity, pain, and motor function following stroke. They also improved the passive range of motion in the lower limbs. The treatment effect was highest when the shock wave frequency was <8 Hz and pressure was <2 bar. However, the effect was not significantly affected by treatment duration. Compared to focused extracorporeal shock waves, released extracorporeal shock waves were associated with better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment outcomes are optimal when a shock wave frequency < 8 Hz, pressure < 2 bar, and released extracorporeal shock waves are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002694","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Recently, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a novel and noninvasive approach for alleviating spasticity and pain, improving motor dysfunction after stroke. To determine the effectiveness of ESWT and the effects of shock wave parameters in relieving spasticity, pain, and motor dysfunction following stroke.

Design: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EBSCOhost, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials on ESWT for limb dysfunction after stroke from inception until February 1, 2023. Two researchers independently searched and screened articles identified from each database, used RevMan v.5.4 analyzing data.

Results: This review included nine articles and 327 patients. ESWT improved the spasticity, pain, and motor function following stroke. They also improved the passive range of motion in the lower limbs. The treatment effect was highest when the shock wave frequency was <8 Hz and pressure was <2 bar. However, the effect was not significantly affected by treatment duration. Compared to focused extracorporeal shock waves, released extracorporeal shock waves were associated with better outcomes.

Conclusion: The treatment outcomes are optimal when a shock wave frequency < 8 Hz, pressure < 2 bar, and released extracorporeal shock waves are used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外冲击波治疗中风后肢体功能障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:近年来,体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)已成为一种新的无创方法,用于缓解中风后的痉挛和疼痛,改善运动功能障碍。目的:探讨ESWT的有效性和冲击波参数在缓解脑卒中后痉挛、疼痛和运动功能障碍中的作用。设计:我们对PubMed、EBSCOhost、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库进行了系统检索,从研究开始到2023年2月1日,对ESWT治疗中风后肢体功能障碍的随机对照试验进行了检索。两名研究者独立地从每个数据库中检索和筛选文章,使用RevMan v.5.4进行数据分析。结果:本综述纳入9篇文章和327例患者。ESWT改善了中风后的痉挛、疼痛和运动功能。他们还改善了下肢的被动活动范围。结论:冲击波频率< 8 Hz,压力< 2 bar,体外释放冲击波治疗效果最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
[Reactions of the cardiovascular system in a healthy person to the orthostatic effect].
IF 0.5 4区 医学KardiologiyaPub Date : 1967-06-01 DOI:
V S Georgievskiĭ, L I Kakurin, V M Mikhaĭlov
The role of insulin as a satiety factor in the central nervous system.
IF 0 Advances in metabolic disordersPub Date : 1983-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-027310-2.50024-4
S C Woods, D Porte
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Supplementary Motor Area on Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-analysis. Comparing Prefabricated and 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses for the Management of Flat Foot Condition: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparison of Combined Virtual Reality Combined With Standing Balance Training Versus Standard Practice in Patients With Hemiplegia: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Axillary Nerve Improves Chronic Shoulder Pain and Dysfunction After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report. Comparative Study Between Aquatic Therapy and Land-Based Exercises in Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1