COVID-19 Misperceptions and Masking Compliance: A Support Marshaling Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2437836
John P Crowley, Erin K Maloney, Amy Bleakley, Timothy S Edwards, Jessica B Langbaum
{"title":"COVID-19 Misperceptions and Masking Compliance: A Support Marshaling Analysis.","authors":"John P Crowley, Erin K Maloney, Amy Bleakley, Timothy S Edwards, Jessica B Langbaum","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2437836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Misperceptions strongly influence the extent to which individuals comply with preventative measures. Social support from others, particularly given widespread mistrust in news media among those holding misperceptions, plays an important role in shaping compliance with preventative measures. The impact of social support, however, is not straightforward and not all support results in greater compliance. The goal of this study is to examine the role of COVID-19 misperceptions in shaping support marshaling and its associations with emotions about masking as well as compliance with masking measures. The findings broadly identify that those who engage avoidance support marshaling are likely fostering echo-chambers, reinforcing misperception and emotions about masking that limit their willingness to comply. Alternatively, those who are approaching support are likely encountering diverse opinions and increasing the opportunity to discuss misperception that influences emotions in ways that may foster more compliance. Implications of these findings for theory and methodological development are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2437836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Misperceptions strongly influence the extent to which individuals comply with preventative measures. Social support from others, particularly given widespread mistrust in news media among those holding misperceptions, plays an important role in shaping compliance with preventative measures. The impact of social support, however, is not straightforward and not all support results in greater compliance. The goal of this study is to examine the role of COVID-19 misperceptions in shaping support marshaling and its associations with emotions about masking as well as compliance with masking measures. The findings broadly identify that those who engage avoidance support marshaling are likely fostering echo-chambers, reinforcing misperception and emotions about masking that limit their willingness to comply. Alternatively, those who are approaching support are likely encountering diverse opinions and increasing the opportunity to discuss misperception that influences emotions in ways that may foster more compliance. Implications of these findings for theory and methodological development are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19误解和掩蔽合规性:支持编组分析。
误解严重影响个人遵守预防措施的程度。来自他人的社会支持,特别是考虑到持有误解的人对新闻媒体的普遍不信任,在促使人们遵守预防措施方面发挥了重要作用。然而,社会支持的影响并不是直截了当的,并不是所有的支持都能提高依从性。本研究的目的是研究COVID-19误解在形成支持编组中的作用,及其与掩蔽情绪以及对掩蔽措施的依从性的关联。研究结果广泛地表明,那些参与回避支持组织的人可能会形成回声室,加强对掩盖的误解和情绪,从而限制他们遵守的意愿。另外,那些寻求支持的人可能会遇到不同的意见,并增加讨论误解的机会,这种误解会影响情绪,从而可能促进更多的顺从。讨论了这些发现对理论和方法发展的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Engaging Minoritized Communities in Clinical Trials Through Social Media: Recommendations from Community-Based Participatory Research. "Just Listen … Really Listen": Expectations of Youth When Disclosing Mental Health Concerns with Parents. Other Management of Patient Privacy: How Physicians Navigate Disclosure of Late-Stage Cancer in China's General Hospitals. Examining Social Support Conversations on Reddit During COVID-19 Using Computational Methods. Decoding the Discourse: Analyzing the Linguistic Features and Strategies Behind the Querdenken Movement's COVID-19 Narrative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1