Caroline Moreau, Pascal Odou, Julien Labreuche, Alexandre Demailly, Gustavo Touzet, Nicolas Reyns, Bastien Gouges, Alain Duhamel, Christine Barthelemy, Damien Lannoy, Natacha Carta, Benjamin Palas, Michèle Vasseur, Felix Marchand, Thomas Ollivier, Céline Leclercq, Camille Potey, Thavarak Ouk, Simon Baigne, Kathy Dujardin, Louise Carton, Anne Sophie Rolland, Jean Christophe Devedjian, Véronique Foutel, Dominique Deplanque, Matthieu Fisichella, David Devos
{"title":"Intracerebroventricular anaerobic dopamine in Parkinson’s disease with l-dopa-related complications: a phase 1/2 randomized-controlled trial","authors":"Caroline Moreau, Pascal Odou, Julien Labreuche, Alexandre Demailly, Gustavo Touzet, Nicolas Reyns, Bastien Gouges, Alain Duhamel, Christine Barthelemy, Damien Lannoy, Natacha Carta, Benjamin Palas, Michèle Vasseur, Felix Marchand, Thomas Ollivier, Céline Leclercq, Camille Potey, Thavarak Ouk, Simon Baigne, Kathy Dujardin, Louise Carton, Anne Sophie Rolland, Jean Christophe Devedjian, Véronique Foutel, Dominique Deplanque, Matthieu Fisichella, David Devos","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03428-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Continuous compensation for cerebral dopamine deficiency represents an ideal treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Dopamine does not cross the digestive and blood–brain barriers and is rapidly oxidized. The new concept is the intracerebroventricular administration of anaerobic dopamine (A-dopamine) using an abdominal pump connected to a subcutaneous catheter implanted in the third ventricle, near the striatum. An open-label phase 1 study showed no serious adverse reactions induced by A-dopamine in 12 patients. A randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover phase 2 study of 1 month of A-dopamine versus 1 month of optimized oral antiparkinsonian therapy was conducted in 9 patients. The primary endpoint, a blinded assessment of the percentage over target (that is, time with dyskinesia or bradykinesia), recorded by home actimetry using a wristwatch, was significantly reduced on A-dopamine compared with that on oral treatment alone (<i>P</i> = 0.027), with a median within-patient difference of −10.4 (Hedge <i>g</i> = −0.62 (95% confidence interval: −1.43, −0.08)). Home diaries were also significantly improved. These initial data on the feasibility, safety and effects of this new device-assisted therapy suggest validation by a large randomized double-blind trial. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04332276.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03428-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Continuous compensation for cerebral dopamine deficiency represents an ideal treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Dopamine does not cross the digestive and blood–brain barriers and is rapidly oxidized. The new concept is the intracerebroventricular administration of anaerobic dopamine (A-dopamine) using an abdominal pump connected to a subcutaneous catheter implanted in the third ventricle, near the striatum. An open-label phase 1 study showed no serious adverse reactions induced by A-dopamine in 12 patients. A randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover phase 2 study of 1 month of A-dopamine versus 1 month of optimized oral antiparkinsonian therapy was conducted in 9 patients. The primary endpoint, a blinded assessment of the percentage over target (that is, time with dyskinesia or bradykinesia), recorded by home actimetry using a wristwatch, was significantly reduced on A-dopamine compared with that on oral treatment alone (P = 0.027), with a median within-patient difference of −10.4 (Hedge g = −0.62 (95% confidence interval: −1.43, −0.08)). Home diaries were also significantly improved. These initial data on the feasibility, safety and effects of this new device-assisted therapy suggest validation by a large randomized double-blind trial. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04332276.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.