177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial

Swayamjeet Satapathy, Piyush Aggarwal, Ashwani Sood, Kunal R. Chandekar, Chandan K. Das, Rajesh Gupta, Divya Khosla, Namrata Das, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Jaya Shukla, Ajay Kumar, Bhagwant Rai Mittal
{"title":"177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial","authors":"Swayamjeet Satapathy, Piyush Aggarwal, Ashwani Sood, Kunal R. Chandekar, Chandan K. Das, Rajesh Gupta, Divya Khosla, Namrata Das, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Jaya Shukla, Ajay Kumar, Bhagwant Rai Mittal","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for advanced well-differentiated grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Few retrospective studies have shown concomitant <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE with radiosensitizing low-dose capecitabine to be effective in advanced NETs. However, this has not been validated in prospective randomized-controlled trials. <strong>Methods:</strong> In this investigator-initiated, parallel-group, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with grade 1/2 GEP-NETs, having progressive somatostatin receptor–positive, locally advanced, or metastatic disease on <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine (experimental arm) or <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE only (control arm). <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE was administered at approximately 7.4 GBq/cycle intravenously, for up to 4 cycles, at 8 wk intervals, whereas capecitabine was given at 1,250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d orally from day 0 to day 14 of each cycle of <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. <strong>Results:</strong> Seventy-two patients (median age, 53 y; range, 18–79 y) were enrolled. The objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.6–50.9%) in the experimental arm versus 30.6% (95% CI, 16.4–48.1%) in the control arm (<em>P</em> = 0.800). The disease control rate was 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9–96.9%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 77.5–98.2%) in the experimental and control arms, respectively (<em>P</em> = 1.000). The estimated median progression-free survival in the experimental arm was 29 mo (95% CI, 22–29 mo) versus 31 mo (95% CI, 29–32 mo) in the control arm (<em>P</em> = 0.401). The median overall survival was not reached in either arm (<em>P</em> = 0.876). Overall, adverse events of at least grade 3 were noted in 7 patients in the experimental arm versus 6 patients in the control arm (<em>P</em> = 0.759). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Based on the results of this trial, the addition of low-dose capecitabine to <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE in advanced grade 1/2 GEP-NETs did not lead to superior radiographic responses. Further studies are needed to evaluate its potential role in high-grade NETs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

177Lu-DOTATATE has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for advanced well-differentiated grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Few retrospective studies have shown concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE with radiosensitizing low-dose capecitabine to be effective in advanced NETs. However, this has not been validated in prospective randomized-controlled trials. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, parallel-group, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with grade 1/2 GEP-NETs, having progressive somatostatin receptor–positive, locally advanced, or metastatic disease on 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine (experimental arm) or 177Lu-DOTATATE only (control arm). 177Lu-DOTATATE was administered at approximately 7.4 GBq/cycle intravenously, for up to 4 cycles, at 8 wk intervals, whereas capecitabine was given at 1,250 mg/m2/d orally from day 0 to day 14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Results: Seventy-two patients (median age, 53 y; range, 18–79 y) were enrolled. The objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.6–50.9%) in the experimental arm versus 30.6% (95% CI, 16.4–48.1%) in the control arm (P = 0.800). The disease control rate was 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9–96.9%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 77.5–98.2%) in the experimental and control arms, respectively (P = 1.000). The estimated median progression-free survival in the experimental arm was 29 mo (95% CI, 22–29 mo) versus 31 mo (95% CI, 29–32 mo) in the control arm (P = 0.401). The median overall survival was not reached in either arm (P = 0.876). Overall, adverse events of at least grade 3 were noted in 7 patients in the experimental arm versus 6 patients in the control arm (P = 0.759). Conclusion: Based on the results of this trial, the addition of low-dose capecitabine to 177Lu-DOTATATE in advanced grade 1/2 GEP-NETs did not lead to superior radiographic responses. Further studies are needed to evaluate its potential role in high-grade NETs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET: A Report from the Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup 177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial Dosimetry Software for Theranostic Applications: Current Capabilities and Future Prospects Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of 18F-PSMA PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT for Assessing Bone Metastases in 160 Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Prostate Cancer In Vivo Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]GTP1 with [18F]MK-6240 and [18F]PI-2620 in Alzheimer Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1