177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial

Swayamjeet Satapathy, Piyush Aggarwal, Ashwani Sood, Kunal R. Chandekar, Chandan K. Das, Rajesh Gupta, Divya Khosla, Namrata Das, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Jaya Shukla, Ajay Kumar, Bhagwant Rai Mittal
{"title":"177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial","authors":"Swayamjeet Satapathy, Piyush Aggarwal, Ashwani Sood, Kunal R. Chandekar, Chandan K. Das, Rajesh Gupta, Divya Khosla, Namrata Das, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Jaya Shukla, Ajay Kumar, Bhagwant Rai Mittal","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for advanced well-differentiated grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Few retrospective studies have shown concomitant <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE with radiosensitizing low-dose capecitabine to be effective in advanced NETs. However, this has not been validated in prospective randomized-controlled trials. <strong>Methods:</strong> In this investigator-initiated, parallel-group, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with grade 1/2 GEP-NETs, having progressive somatostatin receptor–positive, locally advanced, or metastatic disease on <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine (experimental arm) or <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE only (control arm). <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE was administered at approximately 7.4 GBq/cycle intravenously, for up to 4 cycles, at 8 wk intervals, whereas capecitabine was given at 1,250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d orally from day 0 to day 14 of each cycle of <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. <strong>Results:</strong> Seventy-two patients (median age, 53 y; range, 18–79 y) were enrolled. The objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.6–50.9%) in the experimental arm versus 30.6% (95% CI, 16.4–48.1%) in the control arm (<em>P</em> = 0.800). The disease control rate was 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9–96.9%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 77.5–98.2%) in the experimental and control arms, respectively (<em>P</em> = 1.000). The estimated median progression-free survival in the experimental arm was 29 mo (95% CI, 22–29 mo) versus 31 mo (95% CI, 29–32 mo) in the control arm (<em>P</em> = 0.401). The median overall survival was not reached in either arm (<em>P</em> = 0.876). Overall, adverse events of at least grade 3 were noted in 7 patients in the experimental arm versus 6 patients in the control arm (<em>P</em> = 0.759). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Based on the results of this trial, the addition of low-dose capecitabine to <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE in advanced grade 1/2 GEP-NETs did not lead to superior radiographic responses. Further studies are needed to evaluate its potential role in high-grade NETs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

177Lu-DOTATATE has emerged as a viable treatment strategy for advanced well-differentiated grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Few retrospective studies have shown concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE with radiosensitizing low-dose capecitabine to be effective in advanced NETs. However, this has not been validated in prospective randomized-controlled trials. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, parallel-group, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with grade 1/2 GEP-NETs, having progressive somatostatin receptor–positive, locally advanced, or metastatic disease on 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine (experimental arm) or 177Lu-DOTATATE only (control arm). 177Lu-DOTATATE was administered at approximately 7.4 GBq/cycle intravenously, for up to 4 cycles, at 8 wk intervals, whereas capecitabine was given at 1,250 mg/m2/d orally from day 0 to day 14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Results: Seventy-two patients (median age, 53 y; range, 18–79 y) were enrolled. The objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.6–50.9%) in the experimental arm versus 30.6% (95% CI, 16.4–48.1%) in the control arm (P = 0.800). The disease control rate was 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9–96.9%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 77.5–98.2%) in the experimental and control arms, respectively (P = 1.000). The estimated median progression-free survival in the experimental arm was 29 mo (95% CI, 22–29 mo) versus 31 mo (95% CI, 29–32 mo) in the control arm (P = 0.401). The median overall survival was not reached in either arm (P = 0.876). Overall, adverse events of at least grade 3 were noted in 7 patients in the experimental arm versus 6 patients in the control arm (P = 0.759). Conclusion: Based on the results of this trial, the addition of low-dose capecitabine to 177Lu-DOTATATE in advanced grade 1/2 GEP-NETs did not lead to superior radiographic responses. Further studies are needed to evaluate its potential role in high-grade NETs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
177Lu-DOTATATE联合卡培他滨与单独177Lu-DOTATATE治疗晚期1/2级胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(LuCAP):一项随机2期试验
lu - dotatate已成为治疗晚期高分化1/2级胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP-NETs)的一种可行的治疗策略。很少有回顾性研究表明,177Lu-DOTATATE联合低剂量卡培他滨对晚期NETs有效。然而,这还没有在前瞻性随机对照试验中得到验证。方法:在这项研究者启动的、平行组、开放标签的2期试验中,68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT显示患有进行性生长抑制素受体阳性、局部晚期或转移性疾病的1/2级GEP-NETs患者,以1:1的比例随机分配到177Lu-DOTATATE加卡培他滨(实验组)或177Lu-DOTATATE(对照组)。177Lu-DOTATATE以约7.4 GBq/周期静脉注射,最长4个周期,间隔8周,而卡培他滨在177Lu-DOTATATE每个周期的第0天至第14天口服1,250 mg/m2/d。主要终点为客观有效率。次要终点包括疾病控制率、无进展生存期、总生存期和不良事件。结果:72例患者(中位年龄53岁;范围:18-79人。实验组的客观有效率为33.3% (95% CI, 18.6-50.9%),对照组为30.6% (95% CI, 16.4-48.1%) (P = 0.800)。实验组和对照组的疾病控制率分别为88.9% (95% CI, 73.9 ~ 96.9%)和91.7% (95% CI, 77.5 ~ 98.2%) (P = 1.000)。实验组的估计中位无进展生存期为29个月(95% CI, 22-29个月),而对照组为31个月(95% CI, 29 - 32个月)(P = 0.401)。两组的中位总生存期均未达到(P = 0.876)。总体而言,实验组中有7例患者出现3级以上不良事件,对照组中有6例(P = 0.759)。结论:基于本试验的结果,在晚期1/2级GEP-NETs中添加低剂量的卡培他滨至177Lu-DOTATATE并没有导致优越的放射学反应。需要进一步的研究来评价其在高等级神经网络中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and First-in-Human Study of Carbonic Anhydrase IX-Targeting Theranostic Pair, [68Ga]Ga/[177Lu]Lu-NYM096, in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Utility of PSMA PET/CT After an Initial Negative Scan: Results from a Prospective Multicenter PSMA PET Registry. Circulating Tumor DNA Genomic Profiling in 223Ra-Treated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The KYUCOG-1901 Study. Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of Fibroblast Imaging with [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Unclear Hepatic Lesions. Dynamic Total-Body PET Imaging Unfolds [11C]Choline Kinetics and Dosimetry in Primary Hyperparathyroidism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1