Concomitant Statin Use and Survival in Patients With Cancer on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1200/OP-24-00583
Yonghe Liao, Yuxuan Lin, Xinqi Ye, Jinhai Shen
{"title":"Concomitant Statin Use and Survival in Patients With Cancer on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yonghe Liao, Yuxuan Lin, Xinqi Ye, Jinhai Shen","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The prognostic significance of concomitant statin use in cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains a subject of ongoing investigation. This study aims to clarify the prognostic value of statin use in this patient population and to provide a robust, evidence-based foundation to guide therapeutic decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search strategy was used across a multitude of digital archives to exhaustively identify all relevant academic literature published up until June 20, 2024. Studies published in English that reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), along with corresponding 95% CIs, were considered eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate combined HRs with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 studies, involving 46,154 patients with cancer, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that concomitant statin use was linked to better OS (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.92]) and PFS (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.92]) in patients with cancer under ICI therapy. Sensitivity analyses further validated the consistency and robustness of the combined results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On the basis of the available clinical evidence, the concomitant use of statin is linked to an improved prognosis in oncology patients on ICI-based therapy. These observations underscore the potential of statin as an important adjunctive therapy in the treatment paradigm for ICI-treated patients with cancer, thereby establishing their significance as a key consideration in clinical management strategies. Further randomized controlled trials are imperative to validate the effect of statin use within the realm of ICI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400583"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00583","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The prognostic significance of concomitant statin use in cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains a subject of ongoing investigation. This study aims to clarify the prognostic value of statin use in this patient population and to provide a robust, evidence-based foundation to guide therapeutic decisions.

Methods: A systematic search strategy was used across a multitude of digital archives to exhaustively identify all relevant academic literature published up until June 20, 2024. Studies published in English that reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), along with corresponding 95% CIs, were considered eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate combined HRs with 95% CIs.

Results: A total of 25 studies, involving 46,154 patients with cancer, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that concomitant statin use was linked to better OS (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.92]) and PFS (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.92]) in patients with cancer under ICI therapy. Sensitivity analyses further validated the consistency and robustness of the combined results.

Conclusion: On the basis of the available clinical evidence, the concomitant use of statin is linked to an improved prognosis in oncology patients on ICI-based therapy. These observations underscore the potential of statin as an important adjunctive therapy in the treatment paradigm for ICI-treated patients with cancer, thereby establishing their significance as a key consideration in clinical management strategies. Further randomized controlled trials are imperative to validate the effect of statin use within the realm of ICI therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时使用他汀类药物和使用免疫检查点抑制剂的癌症患者的生存率:一项荟萃分析。
目的:他汀类药物联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗癌症的预后意义仍是一个正在进行的研究课题。本研究旨在阐明他汀类药物在该患者群体中的预后价值,并为指导治疗决策提供强有力的循证基础。方法:在大量数字档案中使用系统搜索策略,以详尽地识别截至2024年6月20日发表的所有相关学术文献。发表的英文研究报告了总生存期(OS)和/或无进展生存期(PFS)的风险比(hr),以及相应的95% ci,被认为符合纳入条件。meta分析计算合并hr和95% ci。结果:meta分析共纳入25项研究,涉及46154例癌症患者。综合结果表明,在接受ICI治疗的癌症患者中,同时使用他汀类药物与更好的OS (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71至0.92])和PFS (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69至0.92])相关。敏感性分析进一步验证了综合结果的一致性和稳健性。结论:根据现有的临床证据,他汀类药物的联合使用与肿瘤患者在ci基础治疗中的预后改善有关。这些观察结果强调了他汀类药物作为一种重要的辅助治疗方法的潜力,从而确立了他汀类药物作为临床管理策略的关键考虑因素的重要性。进一步的随机对照试验是必要的,以验证他汀类药物在ICI治疗领域的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Real-World Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Implementation: Challenges and Successes of a Pan-Canadian Initiative to Improve the Future of Patient-Centered Cancer Care. Inpatient Immunotherapy Outcomes Study: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. Facility-Level Disparities in Radiation Use for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. Virtual Second-Opinion Delivery for Oncology Patients. If We Build It, Why They Do Not Come? An American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Collaborative to Understand Barriers to Completion of Cancer Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1