Audio-Based Care for Managing Diabetes in Adults: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002096
Shivani Reddy, Graham Booth, Manny Coker-Schwimmer, Shannon Kugley, Ivette Rodriguez-Borja, Sheila V Patel, Miku Fujita, Sarah Philbrick, Richa Ruwala, Jordan A Albritton, Karen Crotty
{"title":"Audio-Based Care for Managing Diabetes in Adults: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Shivani Reddy, Graham Booth, Manny Coker-Schwimmer, Shannon Kugley, Ivette Rodriguez-Borja, Sheila V Patel, Miku Fujita, Sarah Philbrick, Richa Ruwala, Jordan A Albritton, Karen Crotty","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the effectiveness of audio-based care, as a replacement or a supplement to usual care, for managing diabetes.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes is a chronic condition afflicting many in the United States. The impact of audio-based care on the health of individuals with diabetes is unclear, particularly for those at risk for disparities-many of whom may only be able to access telehealth services through telephone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used systematic review methods to synthesize available evidence. We systematically searched for English-language articles from 2012 reporting randomized controlled trials of adults diagnosed with diabetes. We abstracted data on clinical outcomes (including A1c), patient-reported health and quality-of-life, health care access and utilization, care quality and experience, and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence for replacing in-person care with audio care was limited (n = 2), with low certainty of evidence for greater and comparable effectiveness for A1c and harms, respectively. Supplemental audio care (n = 23) had a positive effect on A1c (pooled mean difference A1c -0.20%; n = 8763; 95% CI: -0.36% to -0.04%), with moderate certainty of evidence. Stratified results indicated that audio interventions supplementing usual care performed more favorably in individuals with A1c ≤ 9%; populations not at risk of disparities; interventions with at least monthly contact; and interventions using remote monitoring tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This evidence base reveals some promise for managing diabetes with audio-based care as a supplement to in-person care. Future studies could further investigate the effectiveness of audio-based care as a replacement and modify interventions to better serve individuals with poor glucose control and those at risk for disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 2","pages":"152-163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We compared the effectiveness of audio-based care, as a replacement or a supplement to usual care, for managing diabetes.

Background: Diabetes is a chronic condition afflicting many in the United States. The impact of audio-based care on the health of individuals with diabetes is unclear, particularly for those at risk for disparities-many of whom may only be able to access telehealth services through telephone.

Methods: We used systematic review methods to synthesize available evidence. We systematically searched for English-language articles from 2012 reporting randomized controlled trials of adults diagnosed with diabetes. We abstracted data on clinical outcomes (including A1c), patient-reported health and quality-of-life, health care access and utilization, care quality and experience, and patient safety.

Results: Evidence for replacing in-person care with audio care was limited (n = 2), with low certainty of evidence for greater and comparable effectiveness for A1c and harms, respectively. Supplemental audio care (n = 23) had a positive effect on A1c (pooled mean difference A1c -0.20%; n = 8763; 95% CI: -0.36% to -0.04%), with moderate certainty of evidence. Stratified results indicated that audio interventions supplementing usual care performed more favorably in individuals with A1c ≤ 9%; populations not at risk of disparities; interventions with at least monthly contact; and interventions using remote monitoring tools.

Conclusions: This evidence base reveals some promise for managing diabetes with audio-based care as a supplement to in-person care. Future studies could further investigate the effectiveness of audio-based care as a replacement and modify interventions to better serve individuals with poor glucose control and those at risk for disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于音频的成人糖尿病管理护理:系统综述。
目的:我们比较了以音频为基础的护理作为常规护理的替代或补充治疗糖尿病的有效性。背景:在美国,糖尿病是一种折磨着许多人的慢性疾病。以音频为基础的护理对糖尿病患者健康的影响尚不清楚,特别是对那些面临差异风险的人——其中许多人可能只能通过电话获得远程保健服务。方法:采用系统评价方法综合现有证据。我们系统地检索了2012年报道糖尿病成人随机对照试验的英文文章。我们提取了临床结果(包括糖化血红蛋白)、患者报告的健康和生活质量、医疗服务的获取和利用、护理质量和体验以及患者安全等方面的数据。结果:用语音护理替代面对面护理的证据有限(n = 2),对糖化血红蛋白和危害的有效性和可比性的证据确定性较低。辅助音频护理(n = 23)对A1c有积极影响(合并平均差异A1c -0.20%;N = 8763;95% CI: -0.36% ~ -0.04%),证据确定性中等。分层结果表明,对于A1c≤9%的患者,音频干预作为常规护理的补充效果更佳;不存在差异风险的人口;至少每月接触的干预措施;以及使用远程监控工具进行干预。结论:这一证据基础揭示了以音频为基础的护理作为面对面护理的补充来管理糖尿病的一些希望。未来的研究可以进一步调查以音频为基础的护理作为替代和修改干预措施的有效性,以更好地服务于血糖控制不良和有差异风险的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury: A Cohort Study of US Veterans. Factors Associated With Psychotherapist and Psychiatrist Participation in Public Insurance: Evidence From Georgia State. Medicare Accountable Care Organization Treatment of Serious Mental Illness: Associations Between Behavioral Health Integration Activities and Outcomes. Audio-Based Care for Managing Chronic Conditions in Adults: A Systematic Review. Audio-Based Care for Managing Diabetes in Adults: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1