How to encourage well-being with reminders interventions: A field experiment on food waste separation and composting behaviors

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Waste management Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2025.01.002
Zhu Mao , Buxin Han , Chuanbin Zhou , Pingping Liu
{"title":"How to encourage well-being with reminders interventions: A field experiment on food waste separation and composting behaviors","authors":"Zhu Mao ,&nbsp;Buxin Han ,&nbsp;Chuanbin Zhou ,&nbsp;Pingping Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although well-being is a fundamental human goal, few studies have clarified the causal relationship between well-being and waste separation, which strongly affects sustainable development. We propose that, assuming humans’ innate affinity for nature (the biophilia theory), waste separation would be conducive to a sense of life meaning and well-being. To test this hypothesis, we systematically investigate how food waste separation and composting behaviors affect subjective well-being and meaning in life in a longitudinal field experiment. 226 valid residents were randomized into intervention (<em>n</em> = 113) or control (<em>n</em> = 113) groups. The participants in the intervention group were provided informational reminders (please separate food waste) for 9 weeks, and were asked to record their food waste separation and composting behaviors. We find that community residents who performed food waste separation and composting behaviors (intervention group) had a higher meaning in life and subjective well-being than those who did not (control group). Meanwhile, food waste separation and composting behaviors can promote subjective well-being through the sequential mediation effects of nature connectedness and meaning in life, validating the biophilia theory. These findings not only provide compelling evidence for how waste separation behaviors can promote well-being but also generate important implications for policy-makers and the understanding of pro-environmental behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 104-114"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25000029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although well-being is a fundamental human goal, few studies have clarified the causal relationship between well-being and waste separation, which strongly affects sustainable development. We propose that, assuming humans’ innate affinity for nature (the biophilia theory), waste separation would be conducive to a sense of life meaning and well-being. To test this hypothesis, we systematically investigate how food waste separation and composting behaviors affect subjective well-being and meaning in life in a longitudinal field experiment. 226 valid residents were randomized into intervention (n = 113) or control (n = 113) groups. The participants in the intervention group were provided informational reminders (please separate food waste) for 9 weeks, and were asked to record their food waste separation and composting behaviors. We find that community residents who performed food waste separation and composting behaviors (intervention group) had a higher meaning in life and subjective well-being than those who did not (control group). Meanwhile, food waste separation and composting behaviors can promote subjective well-being through the sequential mediation effects of nature connectedness and meaning in life, validating the biophilia theory. These findings not only provide compelling evidence for how waste separation behaviors can promote well-being but also generate important implications for policy-makers and the understanding of pro-environmental behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何通过提醒干预来鼓励健康:一项关于食物垃圾分类和堆肥行为的实地实验。
虽然福祉是人类的基本目标,但很少有研究阐明福祉与废物分类之间的因果关系,而废物分类对可持续发展有着强烈的影响。我们提出,假设人类对自然具有天生的亲和力(亲生命理论),废物分类将有助于人们对生活的意义和幸福感。为了验证这一假设,我们通过纵向田野实验系统地研究了食物垃圾分类和堆肥行为如何影响主观幸福感和生活意义。226名有效居民随机分为干预组(n = 113)和对照组(n = 113)。干预组在连续9周的时间内给予食物垃圾分类信息提醒(请将食物垃圾分类),并记录他们的食物垃圾分类和堆肥行为。研究发现,进行食物垃圾分类堆肥行为的社区居民(干预组)的生活意义和主观幸福感高于未进行食物垃圾分类堆肥行为的社区居民(对照组)。同时,食物垃圾分类和堆肥行为可以通过自然连通性和生活意义的顺序中介效应促进主观幸福感,验证了亲生命理论。这些发现不仅为废物分类行为如何促进福祉提供了令人信服的证据,而且对政策制定者和对亲环境行为的理解产生了重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
期刊最新文献
Fluorine release and distribution characteristics of backsheets in thermal treatment recycling of end-of-life photovoltaic modules Water losses during household waste characterization: An overlooked issue? Changes in the mobility of oxyanions from coal combustion residues after 50 years of natural weathering Enhancing low-temperature isothermal convective drying of waste municipal sewage sludge with wood-derived biochar in sequential drying cycles A new insight into PCDD/Fs degradation from MSWI fly ash during CaCO3 oligomer crystallization via low-temperature thermal induction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1