Efficacy and safety of guanfacine in hospitalized patients with delirium: A scoping review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care and Resuscitation Pub Date : 2024-11-24 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.08.009
Nuttapol Pattamin, Atthaphong Phongphithakchai, Sofia Spano, Akinori Maeda, Anis Chaba, Yukiko Hikasa, Rinaldo Bellomo
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of guanfacine in hospitalized patients with delirium: A scoping review.","authors":"Nuttapol Pattamin, Atthaphong Phongphithakchai, Sofia Spano, Akinori Maeda, Anis Chaba, Yukiko Hikasa, Rinaldo Bellomo","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess current evidence regarding guanfacine use in hospitalized patients with delirium.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delirium is a common and important complication of critical illness. Central alpha-2 agonists are often used for symptomatic management. Guanfacine is an enteral central alpha-2 agonist approved for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorders. However, its use for delirium treatment has not been systematically assessed.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>All studies of guanfacine to treat patients with delirium during hospitalization. We excluded reviews, letters, commentaries, correspondence, conference abstracts, expert opinions or editorials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search of the literature using: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL and SCOPUS (Elsevier) from inception until 29 February, 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed the identified citations and abstracts. Data on study and patient characteristics, as well as efficacy and safety outcomes, were extracted. Efficacy was defined by guanfacine's ability to relieve delirium and improve clinical outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mortality. Safety was assessed for hemodynamic stability or other reported side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 908 articles and included two case reports, one case series, two retrospective descriptive cohorts, and one retrospective analytic cohort. Guanfacine therapy was associated with delirium attenuation and a reduction in the use of sedative agents. Median dosage was 1.5 mg daily, with a median time to delirium improvement of 3 days. However, guanfacine therapy was not associated with decreased ICU or hospital LOS. The most frequently reported adverse events were mild hypotension and bradycardia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited data on the efficacy of guanfacine for the treatment of delirium. However, given its pharmacologic properties and its available safety data, controlled investigations may be justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"26 4","pages":"286-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.08.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess current evidence regarding guanfacine use in hospitalized patients with delirium.

Introduction: Delirium is a common and important complication of critical illness. Central alpha-2 agonists are often used for symptomatic management. Guanfacine is an enteral central alpha-2 agonist approved for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorders. However, its use for delirium treatment has not been systematically assessed.

Inclusion criteria: All studies of guanfacine to treat patients with delirium during hospitalization. We excluded reviews, letters, commentaries, correspondence, conference abstracts, expert opinions or editorials.

Methods: We performed a systematic search of the literature using: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL and SCOPUS (Elsevier) from inception until 29 February, 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed the identified citations and abstracts. Data on study and patient characteristics, as well as efficacy and safety outcomes, were extracted. Efficacy was defined by guanfacine's ability to relieve delirium and improve clinical outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mortality. Safety was assessed for hemodynamic stability or other reported side effects.

Results: We screened 908 articles and included two case reports, one case series, two retrospective descriptive cohorts, and one retrospective analytic cohort. Guanfacine therapy was associated with delirium attenuation and a reduction in the use of sedative agents. Median dosage was 1.5 mg daily, with a median time to delirium improvement of 3 days. However, guanfacine therapy was not associated with decreased ICU or hospital LOS. The most frequently reported adverse events were mild hypotension and bradycardia.

Conclusion: There is limited data on the efficacy of guanfacine for the treatment of delirium. However, given its pharmacologic properties and its available safety data, controlled investigations may be justified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胍法辛治疗谵妄住院患者的疗效和安全性:一项范围综述。
目的:评价目前关于住院谵妄患者使用胍法辛的证据。谵妄是危重症常见而重要的并发症。中枢α -2激动剂常用于症状治疗。胍法辛是一种经批准用于治疗注意缺陷多动障碍的肠内中枢α -2激动剂。然而,其在谵妄治疗中的应用尚未得到系统评估。纳入标准:所有使用胍法辛治疗住院期间谵妄患者的研究。我们排除了综述、信件、评论、通信、会议摘要、专家意见或社论。方法:采用MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、CENTRAL和SCOPUS(爱思唯尔)系统检索自成立至2024年2月29日的文献。两名独立审稿人评估了确定的引文和摘要。提取了有关研究和患者特征以及疗效和安全性结果的数据。疗效的定义是胍法辛缓解谵妄和改善临床结果的能力,包括重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)、医院LOS和死亡率。安全性评估为血流动力学稳定性或其他报告的副作用。结果:我们筛选了908篇文章,包括2篇病例报告、1个病例系列、2个回顾性描述性队列和1个回顾性分析队列。胍法辛治疗与谵妄衰减和镇静药使用减少有关。中位剂量为每日1.5 mg,到谵妄改善的中位时间为3天。然而,胍法辛治疗与ICU或医院LOS的降低无关。最常见的不良事件是轻度低血压和心动过缓。结论:胍法辛治疗谵妄的疗效资料有限。然而,考虑到其药理学特性和现有的安全性数据,对照研究可能是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Is hypernatremia worth its salt? Anticoagulation and associated complications in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Continuous frusemide infusion versus intermittent bolus therapy in paediatric intensive care: A single centre retrospective study. Efficacy and safety of guanfacine in hospitalized patients with delirium: A scoping review. Hospital-level volume in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and death or disability at 6 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1