Biomechanical Analysis for Enhanced Expulsion-Proof Intervertebral Fusion Device.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4067574
Shaolong Tang, Dan Pan, Siyuan Chen, Hengyuan Li, Zhaoming Ye
{"title":"Biomechanical Analysis for Enhanced Expulsion-Proof Intervertebral Fusion Device.","authors":"Shaolong Tang, Dan Pan, Siyuan Chen, Hengyuan Li, Zhaoming Ye","doi":"10.1115/1.4067574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the sinking and shifting characteristics of an enhanced expulsion-proof intervertebral fusion device (EEIFD) with a traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion device (TTLIFD). Five specimens of each device were selected for analysis. Four mechanical tests-compression, subsidence, expulsion, and torque-were conducted for each cage. Additionally, a blade-cutting torque test was performed on the EEIFD, with load-displacement curves and mechanical values recorded. In static axial compression, static subsidence, and dynamic subsidence tests, the EEIFD demonstrated performance comparable to the TTLIFD. In expulsion testing, the maximum expulsion force for the EEIFD when the blade was rotated out (534.02 ± 21.24 N) was significantly higher than when the blade was not rotated out (476.97 ± 24.45 N) (P = 6.81 × 10-4). Moreover, the maximum expulsion force for the EEIFD with blade rotation (534.02 ± 21.24 N) was significantly higher than that of the TTLIFD (444.01 ± 12.42 N) (P = 9.82 × 10-5). These findings indicated that the EEIFD effectively enhanced expulsion prevention and antisubsidence performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the sinking and shifting characteristics of an enhanced expulsion-proof intervertebral fusion device (EEIFD) with a traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion device (TTLIFD). Five specimens of each device were selected for analysis. Four mechanical tests-compression, subsidence, expulsion, and torque-were conducted for each cage. Additionally, a blade-cutting torque test was performed on the EEIFD, with load-displacement curves and mechanical values recorded. In static axial compression, static subsidence, and dynamic subsidence tests, the EEIFD demonstrated performance comparable to the TTLIFD. In expulsion testing, the maximum expulsion force for the EEIFD when the blade was rotated out (534.02 ± 21.24 N) was significantly higher than when the blade was not rotated out (476.97 ± 24.45 N) (P = 6.81 × 10-4). Moreover, the maximum expulsion force for the EEIFD with blade rotation (534.02 ± 21.24 N) was significantly higher than that of the TTLIFD (444.01 ± 12.42 N) (P = 9.82 × 10-5). These findings indicated that the EEIFD effectively enhanced expulsion prevention and antisubsidence performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强型防排出椎间融合器的生物力学分析。
本研究旨在比较增强型防逃逸椎间融合器与传统TLIF椎间融合器的下沉和移位情况。选择改进的抗逃逸椎间笼和传统的TLIF椎间笼各5个标本。对每个保持架进行了四种类型的力学试验,并对防逃逸保持架进行了叶片切削扭矩试验,记录了载荷-位移曲线和力学值。在静轴压性能试验、静沉降试验和动沉降试验中,改进后的防逃逸笼与传统的TLIF笼基本一致。在静态逃逸性能测试中,改进后的防逃逸笼叶片转出时的最大逃逸力(534.02±21.24N)高于叶片未转出时的最大逃逸力(476.97±24.45N) (P=6.81E-04)。改进的抗逃逸笼叶片旋转时的最大逃逸力(534.02±21.24N)显著高于传统的TLIF笼(444.01±12.42N) (P=9.82E-05)。改进后的防逃逸笼产品有效提高了装置的防逃逸和抗沉降性能,体现了生物力学的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical Analysis for Enhanced Expulsion-Proof Intervertebral Fusion Device. Multiscale Finite Element Modeling of Human Ear for Acoustic Wave Transmission Into Cochlea and Hair Cells Fatigue Failure. Toward a Consistent Framework for Describing the Free Vibration Modes of the Brain. Quantification of Internal Disc Strain Under Dynamic Loading Via High-Frequency Ultrasound. The Influence of Occupant Characteristics, Seat Positioning, and Pre-Crash Maneuvers on Front Passenger Safety Performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1