Voices on academic accreditation: lived experiences of nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni in nursing education.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06657-2
Ebtsam Aly Abou Hashish, Hend Alnajjar, Hawazen Rawas
{"title":"Voices on academic accreditation: lived experiences of nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni in nursing education.","authors":"Ebtsam Aly Abou Hashish, Hend Alnajjar, Hawazen Rawas","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06657-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic accreditation is a pivotal process in nursing education, ensuring program quality, consistency, and graduate readiness for professional practice. Despite its significance, limited research explores the lived experiences and perspectives of stakeholders, including academic nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni-engaged in accreditation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the lived experiences, perceptions, and insights of nursing education stakeholders regarding the accreditation process, focusing on its impact on educational quality, program reputation, and professional preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, using purposive sampling to recruit 54 participants from a Saudi nursing college, including academic nurse educators and administrators (n = 24), students (n = 20), and alumni (n = 10). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews.Thematic analysis identified key themes and subthemes associated with participants' experiences of accreditation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Six main themes emerged: (1) knowledge and experience of accreditation; (2) importance and benefits of accreditation; (3) impact of accreditation; (4) preparation for professional practice; (5) challenges of accreditation; and (6) suggestions for improvement. Stakeholders across all groups recognized accreditation as essential for program quality and career readiness. Faculty and alumni emphasized the role of accreditation in enhancing program reputation and credibility, while students highlighted its influence on their learning experiences, though they expressed a desire for more engagement and transparency in the process. Faculty and administrators reported significant challenges, including administrative demands, time management, and resource allocation in maintaining accreditation standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study offers a comprehensive view of accreditation's multi-dimensional impact from multiple stakeholder perspectives and experiences, reinforcing accreditation's importance in promoting nursing education quality and alignment with healthcare standards. However, findings suggest a need for institutional support to manage accreditation demands effectively. Future research should investigate accreditation's long-term impact through longitudinal and multi-site studies to broaden understanding and enhance the generalizability of findings in nursing education contexts worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06657-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Academic accreditation is a pivotal process in nursing education, ensuring program quality, consistency, and graduate readiness for professional practice. Despite its significance, limited research explores the lived experiences and perspectives of stakeholders, including academic nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni-engaged in accreditation.

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences, perceptions, and insights of nursing education stakeholders regarding the accreditation process, focusing on its impact on educational quality, program reputation, and professional preparation.

Methods: A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, using purposive sampling to recruit 54 participants from a Saudi nursing college, including academic nurse educators and administrators (n = 24), students (n = 20), and alumni (n = 10). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews.Thematic analysis identified key themes and subthemes associated with participants' experiences of accreditation.

Findings: Six main themes emerged: (1) knowledge and experience of accreditation; (2) importance and benefits of accreditation; (3) impact of accreditation; (4) preparation for professional practice; (5) challenges of accreditation; and (6) suggestions for improvement. Stakeholders across all groups recognized accreditation as essential for program quality and career readiness. Faculty and alumni emphasized the role of accreditation in enhancing program reputation and credibility, while students highlighted its influence on their learning experiences, though they expressed a desire for more engagement and transparency in the process. Faculty and administrators reported significant challenges, including administrative demands, time management, and resource allocation in maintaining accreditation standards.

Conclusion: This study offers a comprehensive view of accreditation's multi-dimensional impact from multiple stakeholder perspectives and experiences, reinforcing accreditation's importance in promoting nursing education quality and alignment with healthcare standards. However, findings suggest a need for institutional support to manage accreditation demands effectively. Future research should investigate accreditation's long-term impact through longitudinal and multi-site studies to broaden understanding and enhance the generalizability of findings in nursing education contexts worldwide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术鉴定的声音:护理教育工作者、管理人员、学生和护理教育校友的生活经验。
背景:学术评审是护理教育的一个关键过程,它确保了项目的质量、一致性和毕业生为专业实践做好准备。目的:本研究旨在探讨护理教育利益相关者对评审过程的生活经历、看法和见解,重点关注其对教育质量、项目声誉和专业准备的影响:采用定性现象学方法,通过有目的的抽样,从沙特一所护理学院招募了 54 名参与者,包括学术护士教育者和管理者(n = 24)、学生(n = 20)和校友(n = 10)。通过半结构化访谈收集数据。主题分析确定了与参与者评审经历相关的关键主题和次主题:出现了六大主题:(1) 对评审的认识和经验;(2) 评审的重要性和益处;(3) 评审的影响;(4) 为专业实践做准备;(5) 评审的挑战;以及 (6) 改进建议。所有团体的利益相关者都认为,认证对课程质量和职业准备至关重要。教师和校友强调了认证在提高课程声誉和可信度方面的作用,而学生则强调了认证对他们学习经历的影响,尽管他们表示希望认证过程能有更多的参与性和透明度。教职员工和行政人员表示,在维持评审标准方面面临着巨大的挑战,包括行政需求、时间管理和资源分配:本研究从多个利益相关者的角度和经验出发,全面阐述了评审的多维影响,强化了评审在促进护理教育质量和与医疗保健标准接轨方面的重要性。然而,研究结果表明,要有效管理评审要求,需要机构的支持。未来的研究应通过纵向和多站点研究来调查评审的长期影响,以扩大对全球护理教育背景的理解并增强研究结果的普适性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of deliberate practices versus conventional lecture in trauma training for medical students. Outcome-based simulation training for ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: clinical impact on preventing mechanical complications. Assessing the role of medical entomology in general medicine education in Iran: expert perspectives and curriculum implications. Brain drain in Emergency Medicine in Lebanon, building locally and exporting globally. Development and validation of a tool to measure telehealth educational environment (THEEM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1