Sebastian Arenas, Yacine Djabali, Renaud Rincent, Philippe Cubry, Marie-Laure Martin, Mélisande Blein-Nicolas, Laurent Laplaze, Hannah Schneider, Alexandre Grondin
{"title":"Modeling plant phenotypic plasticity and its underlying genetic architecture: a comparative study.","authors":"Sebastian Arenas, Yacine Djabali, Renaud Rincent, Philippe Cubry, Marie-Laure Martin, Mélisande Blein-Nicolas, Laurent Laplaze, Hannah Schneider, Alexandre Grondin","doi":"10.1093/jxb/eraf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phenotypic plasticity can contribute to crop adaptation to challenging environments. Plasticity indices are potentially useful to identify the genetic basis of crop phenotypic plasticity. Numerous methods exist to measure phenotypic plasticity. However, their ability to capture QTL with environmental effects remains elusive. Here, we analyzed a published multi-trial maize phenotyping dataset that examined the water stress response of leaf area, shoot biomass and water use efficiency, calculating phenotypic plasticity for these traits using seven different plasticity indices. A comprehensive genetic analysis of phenotypic plasticity for these traits was further performed and the ability of these methods to detect genetic regions capturing variance due to genotype-by-environment (G x E) interaction was evaluated. Our results suggest that not all plasticity indices are amenable to identify genomic regions associated with phenotypic plasticity. We observed that plasticity indices based on calculation of a ratio between environments or the slope of the Finlay-Wilkinson model were particularly useful in uncovering the genetic architecture underlying phenotypic plasticity when studying responses to treatments within and across trials. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of phenotypic plasticity should provide opportunities for breeding plants better able to adapt to climate uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":15820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity can contribute to crop adaptation to challenging environments. Plasticity indices are potentially useful to identify the genetic basis of crop phenotypic plasticity. Numerous methods exist to measure phenotypic plasticity. However, their ability to capture QTL with environmental effects remains elusive. Here, we analyzed a published multi-trial maize phenotyping dataset that examined the water stress response of leaf area, shoot biomass and water use efficiency, calculating phenotypic plasticity for these traits using seven different plasticity indices. A comprehensive genetic analysis of phenotypic plasticity for these traits was further performed and the ability of these methods to detect genetic regions capturing variance due to genotype-by-environment (G x E) interaction was evaluated. Our results suggest that not all plasticity indices are amenable to identify genomic regions associated with phenotypic plasticity. We observed that plasticity indices based on calculation of a ratio between environments or the slope of the Finlay-Wilkinson model were particularly useful in uncovering the genetic architecture underlying phenotypic plasticity when studying responses to treatments within and across trials. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of phenotypic plasticity should provide opportunities for breeding plants better able to adapt to climate uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Botany publishes high-quality primary research and review papers in the plant sciences. These papers cover a range of disciplines from molecular and cellular physiology and biochemistry through whole plant physiology to community physiology.
Full-length primary papers should contribute to our understanding of how plants develop and function, and should provide new insights into biological processes. The journal will not publish purely descriptive papers or papers that report a well-known process in a species in which the process has not been identified previously. Articles should be concise and generally limited to 10 printed pages.