Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Dementia: A Retrospective Analysis for People with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Referred to an Australian Dementia Support Service.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01177-y
Mustafa Atee, Andrew Stafford, Daniel Whiting, Ya Ping Lee, Christopher Morrow, Guillaume Nyakaboyi, Ella Warnes, Thomas Morris
{"title":"Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Dementia: A Retrospective Analysis for People with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Referred to an Australian Dementia Support Service.","authors":"Mustafa Atee, Andrew Stafford, Daniel Whiting, Ya Ping Lee, Christopher Morrow, Guillaume Nyakaboyi, Ella Warnes, Thomas Morris","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01177-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite their limited benefits and serious adverse effects, psychotropics remain frequently prescribed for neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of dementia. Psychotropic polypharmacy, the use of two or more concomitant psychotropic medications, is therefore not recommended for people with dementia. The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of psychotropic polypharmacy in Australians living with dementia whose caregivers sought external NPS support from Dementia Support Australia (DSA; the national provider of NPS support) and the association of psychotropic polypharmacy with their demographics and NPS characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study of a subset of DSA referrals at baseline (i.e., yet to receive psychosocial intervention(s)) between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. Referrals with and without psychotropic polypharmacy were compared on the basis of demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, dementia subtype), NPS type (e.g., agitation), NPS severity and associated caregiver distress as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), using Pearson's chi-square test and Welch's t-test for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between individual NPI domains and exposure to psychotropic polypharmacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 421 referrals (mean age 81.5 (standard deviation 8.5) years, 52.3% males, 46.8% Alzheimer's disease) were analysed. Of those, over 90% (n = 383) were prescribed at least one psychotropic, with 214 referrals (50.8%) prescribed psychotropic polypharmacy. The medication types most associated with psychotropic polypharmacy were antipsychotics (n = 162, 75.7%), opioids (n = 104, 48.6%), anxiolytics (n = 93, 43.5%), sedative/hypnotics (n = 52, 24.3%) and antidepressants (n = 47, 22.0%). No relationship between psychotropic polypharmacy and any variable tested was identified, including age, sex, dementia subtype and NPI severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychotropic polypharmacy is highly prevalent in Australians living with dementia referred to external dementia-specific behaviour support programs, but no factors were associated with its presence in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01177-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Despite their limited benefits and serious adverse effects, psychotropics remain frequently prescribed for neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of dementia. Psychotropic polypharmacy, the use of two or more concomitant psychotropic medications, is therefore not recommended for people with dementia. The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of psychotropic polypharmacy in Australians living with dementia whose caregivers sought external NPS support from Dementia Support Australia (DSA; the national provider of NPS support) and the association of psychotropic polypharmacy with their demographics and NPS characteristics.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of a subset of DSA referrals at baseline (i.e., yet to receive psychosocial intervention(s)) between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. Referrals with and without psychotropic polypharmacy were compared on the basis of demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, dementia subtype), NPS type (e.g., agitation), NPS severity and associated caregiver distress as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), using Pearson's chi-square test and Welch's t-test for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between individual NPI domains and exposure to psychotropic polypharmacy.

Results: A total of 421 referrals (mean age 81.5 (standard deviation 8.5) years, 52.3% males, 46.8% Alzheimer's disease) were analysed. Of those, over 90% (n = 383) were prescribed at least one psychotropic, with 214 referrals (50.8%) prescribed psychotropic polypharmacy. The medication types most associated with psychotropic polypharmacy were antipsychotics (n = 162, 75.7%), opioids (n = 104, 48.6%), anxiolytics (n = 93, 43.5%), sedative/hypnotics (n = 52, 24.3%) and antidepressants (n = 47, 22.0%). No relationship between psychotropic polypharmacy and any variable tested was identified, including age, sex, dementia subtype and NPI severity.

Conclusions: Psychotropic polypharmacy is highly prevalent in Australians living with dementia referred to external dementia-specific behaviour support programs, but no factors were associated with its presence in this cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症的精神药物综合治疗:对澳大利亚痴呆症支持服务中心的神经精神症状患者的回顾性分析。
背景和目的:尽管精神类药物的益处有限且有严重的副作用,但它们仍然经常用于治疗痴呆的神经精神症状(NPS)。因此,不建议痴呆症患者同时使用两种或两种以上的精神药物。本研究的目的是调查澳大利亚痴呆症患者的精神药物综合用药的患病率,这些患者的护理人员向澳大利亚痴呆症支持中心(DSA;(国家NPS支持提供者)以及精神药物综合用药与其人口统计和NPS特征的关联。方法:对2016年至2020年期间基线(即尚未接受心理社会干预)的DSA转诊子集进行回顾性横断面研究。根据人口统计学特征(如性别、痴呆亚型)、NPS类型(如躁动)、NPS严重程度和相关护理者痛苦(由神经精神量表(NPI)测量),分别对分类数据和连续数据使用Pearson卡方检验和Welch t检验,对有和没有精神药物综合用药的转诊患者进行比较。使用逻辑回归模型来检验个体NPI域与精神药物多药暴露之间的关系。结果:共分析421例转诊患者,平均年龄81.5岁(标准差8.5),男性52.3%,阿尔茨海默病46.8%。其中,超过90% (n = 383)的患者至少服用了一种精神药物,214名患者(50.8%)服用了多种精神药物。与精神药物综合用药相关最多的药物类型为抗精神病药(162种,75.7%)、阿片类药物(104种,48.6%)、抗焦虑药(93种,43.5%)、镇静/催眠药(52种,24.3%)和抗抑郁药(47种,22.0%)。精神药物多药与任何测试变量没有关系,包括年龄、性别、痴呆亚型和NPI严重程度。结论:精神药物多重用药在澳大利亚痴呆症患者中非常普遍,涉及到外部痴呆症特定行为支持计划,但在本队列中没有与之相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
期刊最新文献
Regular Use of Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in a Population of Polish Seniors: Findings from the PolSenior2 Cross-Sectional Survey. Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Dementia: A Retrospective Analysis for People with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Referred to an Australian Dementia Support Service. An Educational Intervention to Promote Central Nervous System-Active Deprescribing in Dementia: A Pilot Study. How Should Clinicians Discuss Deprescribing with Caregivers of Older Adults Living with Dementia? A Qualitative Study. Pharmacologic Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1