An Educational Intervention to Promote Central Nervous System-Active Deprescribing in Dementia: A Pilot Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01178-x
Noah M Barnett, Sarah E Vordenberg, H Myra Kim, Molly Turnwald, Julie Strominger, Amanda N Leggett, Esther Akinyemi, Frederic C Blow, Alyssa Vanderziel, Celeste Pappas, Donovan T Maust
{"title":"An Educational Intervention to Promote Central Nervous System-Active Deprescribing in Dementia: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Noah M Barnett, Sarah E Vordenberg, H Myra Kim, Molly Turnwald, Julie Strominger, Amanda N Leggett, Esther Akinyemi, Frederic C Blow, Alyssa Vanderziel, Celeste Pappas, Donovan T Maust","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01178-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central nervous system (CNS)-active polypharmacy (defined as concurrent exposure to three or more antidepressant, antipsychotic, antiseizure, benzodiazepine, opioid, or nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists) is associated with significant potential harms in persons living with dementia (PLWD).We conducted a pilot trial to assess a patient nudge intervention's implementation feasibility and preliminary effectiveness to prompt deprescribing conversations between PLWD experiencing CNS-active polypharmacy and their primary care clinicians (\"clinicians\").</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the electronic health record to identify PLWD prescribed CNS-active polypharmacy in primary care clinics from two health systems. Clinics were assigned to intervention (n = 10) or control (n = 12), with PLWD in intervention clinics mailed an educational brochure to prompt discussion with clinicians about the appropriateness of their CNS-active regimen. We conducted chart reviews for evidence of documentation related to these medications and used the electronic health record (EHR) to assess preliminary effectiveness 120 days after sending the brochure (e.g., number of CNS-active medications prescribed, change in total standardized daily dose [TSDD] of CNS-active medications, and change in prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy). We interviewed 10 clinicians from intervention clinics to assess their perceptions about the acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PLWD in the intervention group (n = 61) and control group (n = 68) had an average age of 72.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.7), 62.8% were female, and 84.5% were white. We did not find any documented evidence of conversations related to CNS-active medications between PLWD who received the brochure and their primary care clinicians. After 120 days, there was no significant between-group difference in the mean number of CNS-active medications prescribed (- 1.0 [SD 1.3] versus - 1.0 [SD 1.3]), mean TSDD (- 1.6 [SD 6.0] versus - 1.3 [SD 5.8]), or the percentage of patients with CNS-active polypharmacy (52.6% versus 50.4%). Interviews with clinicians suggested they were aware that combinations of CNS-active medications were not ideal; however, they reported inheriting patients who were already on these medications, and they did not have sufficient clinic time or access to safer alternatives to overcome patient hesitation to deprescribe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A direct-to-patient mailed educational brochure did not demonstrate feasibility in provoking deprescribing conversations between PLWD and clinicians or preliminary effectiveness in decreasing CNS-active polypharmacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01178-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central nervous system (CNS)-active polypharmacy (defined as concurrent exposure to three or more antidepressant, antipsychotic, antiseizure, benzodiazepine, opioid, or nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists) is associated with significant potential harms in persons living with dementia (PLWD).We conducted a pilot trial to assess a patient nudge intervention's implementation feasibility and preliminary effectiveness to prompt deprescribing conversations between PLWD experiencing CNS-active polypharmacy and their primary care clinicians ("clinicians").

Methods: We used the electronic health record to identify PLWD prescribed CNS-active polypharmacy in primary care clinics from two health systems. Clinics were assigned to intervention (n = 10) or control (n = 12), with PLWD in intervention clinics mailed an educational brochure to prompt discussion with clinicians about the appropriateness of their CNS-active regimen. We conducted chart reviews for evidence of documentation related to these medications and used the electronic health record (EHR) to assess preliminary effectiveness 120 days after sending the brochure (e.g., number of CNS-active medications prescribed, change in total standardized daily dose [TSDD] of CNS-active medications, and change in prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy). We interviewed 10 clinicians from intervention clinics to assess their perceptions about the acceptability of the intervention.

Results: PLWD in the intervention group (n = 61) and control group (n = 68) had an average age of 72.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.7), 62.8% were female, and 84.5% were white. We did not find any documented evidence of conversations related to CNS-active medications between PLWD who received the brochure and their primary care clinicians. After 120 days, there was no significant between-group difference in the mean number of CNS-active medications prescribed (- 1.0 [SD 1.3] versus - 1.0 [SD 1.3]), mean TSDD (- 1.6 [SD 6.0] versus - 1.3 [SD 5.8]), or the percentage of patients with CNS-active polypharmacy (52.6% versus 50.4%). Interviews with clinicians suggested they were aware that combinations of CNS-active medications were not ideal; however, they reported inheriting patients who were already on these medications, and they did not have sufficient clinic time or access to safer alternatives to overcome patient hesitation to deprescribe.

Conclusions: A direct-to-patient mailed educational brochure did not demonstrate feasibility in provoking deprescribing conversations between PLWD and clinicians or preliminary effectiveness in decreasing CNS-active polypharmacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育干预促进痴呆患者中枢神经系统主动降药:一项试点研究。
背景:中枢神经系统(CNS)活性多药(定义为同时暴露于三种或三种以上抗抑郁药、抗精神病药、抗癫痫药、苯二氮卓类药物、阿片类药物或非苯二氮卓类药物苯二氮卓受体激动剂)与痴呆(PLWD)患者显著的潜在危害相关。我们进行了一项试点试验,以评估患者轻推干预的实施可行性和初步有效性,以促进患有中枢神经系统活跃的多重用药的PLWD与其初级保健医生(“临床医生”)之间的描述对话。方法:我们使用电子健康记录来识别来自两个卫生系统的初级保健诊所的PLWD处方cns活性多药。诊所被分配到干预组(n = 10)或对照组(n = 12),干预组的PLWD诊所邮寄了一份教育小册子,以促使临床医生讨论他们的中枢神经系统活跃方案的适当性。我们对与这些药物相关的文件证据进行了图表审查,并使用电子健康记录(EHR)在发送宣传册120天后评估初步有效性(例如,规定的中枢神经系统活性药物的数量,中枢神经系统活性药物的总标准化日剂量[TSDD]的变化,以及中枢神经系统活性药物的流行率的变化)。我们采访了来自干预诊所的10名临床医生,以评估他们对干预可接受性的看法。结果:干预组(n = 61)和对照组(n = 68) PLWD患者平均年龄为72.4岁(标准差[SD] 9.7),女性占62.8%,白人占84.5%。我们没有发现任何书面证据表明收到宣传册的PLWD与其初级保健临床医生之间有关于中枢神经系统活性药物的对话。120天后,两组间在平均服用中枢神经系统活性药物的数量(- 1.0 [SD 1.3] vs - 1.0 [SD 1.3])、平均TSDD (- 1.6 [SD 6.0] vs - 1.3 [SD 5.8])和服用中枢神经系统活性药物的患者比例(52.6% vs 50.4%)方面均无显著差异。与临床医生的访谈表明,他们意识到中枢神经系统活性药物的组合并不理想;然而,他们报告说,他们继承了已经在使用这些药物的患者,他们没有足够的临床时间或获得更安全的替代品来克服患者对撤销处方的犹豫。结论:直接邮寄给患者的教育宣传册在激发PLWD和临床医生之间的处方对话方面并不可行,在减少中枢神经系统活性的多药治疗方面也没有初步的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
期刊最新文献
Regular Use of Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in a Population of Polish Seniors: Findings from the PolSenior2 Cross-Sectional Survey. Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Dementia: A Retrospective Analysis for People with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Referred to an Australian Dementia Support Service. An Educational Intervention to Promote Central Nervous System-Active Deprescribing in Dementia: A Pilot Study. How Should Clinicians Discuss Deprescribing with Caregivers of Older Adults Living with Dementia? A Qualitative Study. Pharmacologic Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1