Integrating vestibular and visual cues for verticality perception.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06992-8
Catho Schoenmaekers, Floris L Wuyts, Elisa R Ferre
{"title":"Integrating vestibular and visual cues for verticality perception.","authors":"Catho Schoenmaekers, Floris L Wuyts, Elisa R Ferre","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06992-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Verticality is the perception of what's upright relative to gravity. The vestibular system provides information about the head's orientation relative to gravity, while visual cues influence the perception of external objects' alignment with the vertical. According to Bayesian integration, the perception of verticality depends on the relative reliability of visual and vestibular cues. Ambiguities in vestibular signals are resolved through visual information, with the brain integrating these cues alongside prior knowledge of the upright orientation. While it is established that both vestibular and visual cues contribute to verticality perception, the precise mechanisms underlying this integration remain unclear. Here we investigated how the human brain combines vestibular and visual cues to perceive verticality based on their reliability. We assessed verticality perception using a signal detection theory based visual verticality detection task. Participants were shown lines that were either vertical or tilted and asked to judge their orientation. To manipulate cue reliability, we used optokinetic stimulation for visual cues, galvanic vestibular stimulation for vestibular cues, and a combined visual-vestibular condition by simultaneously delivering optokinetic and galvanic vestibular stimulation. Sham stimulations were administered to control for non-specific effects. Our findings demonstrate that reductions in the reliability of visual and vestibular cues impair sensitivity to verticality, with visual cues exerting a more pronounced influence. Importantly, no changes in response bias were observed. The observed pattern aligns with a model in which the relative contributions of visual and vestibular inputs are determined by linear weightings and their combined summation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 2","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06992-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Verticality is the perception of what's upright relative to gravity. The vestibular system provides information about the head's orientation relative to gravity, while visual cues influence the perception of external objects' alignment with the vertical. According to Bayesian integration, the perception of verticality depends on the relative reliability of visual and vestibular cues. Ambiguities in vestibular signals are resolved through visual information, with the brain integrating these cues alongside prior knowledge of the upright orientation. While it is established that both vestibular and visual cues contribute to verticality perception, the precise mechanisms underlying this integration remain unclear. Here we investigated how the human brain combines vestibular and visual cues to perceive verticality based on their reliability. We assessed verticality perception using a signal detection theory based visual verticality detection task. Participants were shown lines that were either vertical or tilted and asked to judge their orientation. To manipulate cue reliability, we used optokinetic stimulation for visual cues, galvanic vestibular stimulation for vestibular cues, and a combined visual-vestibular condition by simultaneously delivering optokinetic and galvanic vestibular stimulation. Sham stimulations were administered to control for non-specific effects. Our findings demonstrate that reductions in the reliability of visual and vestibular cues impair sensitivity to verticality, with visual cues exerting a more pronounced influence. Importantly, no changes in response bias were observed. The observed pattern aligns with a model in which the relative contributions of visual and vestibular inputs are determined by linear weightings and their combined summation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合前庭和视觉线索的垂直感知。
垂直度是相对于重力的垂直感知。前庭系统提供有关头部相对于重力方向的信息,而视觉线索则影响对外部物体与垂直方向对齐的感知。根据贝叶斯整合,垂直感取决于视觉和前庭线索的相对可靠性。前庭信号的模糊性是通过视觉信息解决的,大脑将这些线索与先前的直立方向知识整合在一起。虽然已经确定前庭和视觉线索都有助于垂直感知,但这种整合的确切机制尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了人类大脑如何结合前庭和视觉线索,根据它们的可靠性来感知垂直度。我们使用基于信号检测理论的视觉垂直度检测任务来评估垂直度感知。研究人员向参与者展示了垂直或倾斜的线条,并要求他们判断它们的方向。为了控制线索的可靠性,我们使用光动力刺激视觉线索,前庭电刺激前庭线索,并通过同时提供光动力和前庭电刺激来组合视觉-前庭条件。假性刺激作为非特异性效果的对照。我们的研究结果表明,视觉和前庭线索的可靠性降低会损害对垂直的敏感性,其中视觉线索的影响更为明显。重要的是,没有观察到反应偏倚的变化。观察到的模式与视觉和前庭输入的相对贡献由线性权重和它们的组合总和决定的模型一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting motor unit recruitment to TMS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cortical inhibition is retained during voluntary contractions. Comparative analysis of Voxel-based morphometry using T1 and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to explore the relationship between brain structure and cognitive abilities. Error compensation in a redundant system during 'failure' of individual motor elements. Reading words versus seeing font or handwriting style: a study of hemifield processing. Integrating vestibular and visual cues for verticality perception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1