From MRI to FEM: an automated pipeline for biomechanical simulations of vertebrae and intervertebral discs.

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1485115
Kati Nispel, Tanja Lerchl, Gabriel Gruber, Hendrik Moeller, Robert Graf, Veit Senner, Jan S Kirschke
{"title":"From MRI to FEM: an automated pipeline for biomechanical simulations of vertebrae and intervertebral discs.","authors":"Kati Nispel, Tanja Lerchl, Gabriel Gruber, Hendrik Moeller, Robert Graf, Veit Senner, Jan S Kirschke","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2024.1485115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biomechanical simulations can enhance our understanding of spinal disorders. Applied to large cohorts, they can reveal complex mechanisms beyond conventional imaging. Therefore, automating the patient-specific modeling process is essential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an automated and robust pipeline that generates and simulates biofidelic vertebrae and intervertebral disc finite element method (FEM) models based on automated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentations. In a first step, anatomically-constrained smoothing approaches were implemented to ensure seamless contact surfaces between vertebrae and discs with shared nodes. Subsequently, surface meshes were filled isotropically with tetrahedral elements. Lastly, simulations were executed. The performance of our pipeline was evaluated using a set of 30 patients from an in-house dataset that comprised an overall of 637 vertebrae and 600 intervertebral discs. We rated mesh quality metrics and processing times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With an average number of 21 vertebrae and 20 IVDs per subject, the average processing time was 4.4 min for a vertebra and 31 s for an IVD. The average percentage of poor quality elements stayed below 2% in all generated FEM models, measured by their aspect ratio. Ten vertebra and seven IVD FE simulations failed to converge.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The main goal of our work was to automate the modeling and FEM simulation of both patient-specific vertebrae and intervertebral discs with shared-node surfaces directly from MRI segmentations. The biofidelity, robustness and time-efficacy of our pipeline marks an important step towards investigating large patient cohorts for statistically relevant, biomechanical insight.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"12 ","pages":"1485115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1485115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biomechanical simulations can enhance our understanding of spinal disorders. Applied to large cohorts, they can reveal complex mechanisms beyond conventional imaging. Therefore, automating the patient-specific modeling process is essential.

Methods: We developed an automated and robust pipeline that generates and simulates biofidelic vertebrae and intervertebral disc finite element method (FEM) models based on automated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentations. In a first step, anatomically-constrained smoothing approaches were implemented to ensure seamless contact surfaces between vertebrae and discs with shared nodes. Subsequently, surface meshes were filled isotropically with tetrahedral elements. Lastly, simulations were executed. The performance of our pipeline was evaluated using a set of 30 patients from an in-house dataset that comprised an overall of 637 vertebrae and 600 intervertebral discs. We rated mesh quality metrics and processing times.

Results: With an average number of 21 vertebrae and 20 IVDs per subject, the average processing time was 4.4 min for a vertebra and 31 s for an IVD. The average percentage of poor quality elements stayed below 2% in all generated FEM models, measured by their aspect ratio. Ten vertebra and seven IVD FE simulations failed to converge.

Discussion: The main goal of our work was to automate the modeling and FEM simulation of both patient-specific vertebrae and intervertebral discs with shared-node surfaces directly from MRI segmentations. The biofidelity, robustness and time-efficacy of our pipeline marks an important step towards investigating large patient cohorts for statistically relevant, biomechanical insight.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从MRI到FEM:椎骨和椎间盘生物力学模拟的自动化流水线。
生物力学模拟可以增强我们对脊柱疾病的理解。应用于大型队列,它们可以揭示传统成像之外的复杂机制。因此,自动化特定于患者的建模过程是必不可少的。方法:基于自动磁共振成像(MRI)分割,我们开发了一个自动化和强大的管道,生成和模拟生物椎体和椎间盘有限元方法(FEM)模型。在第一步中,采用解剖约束的平滑方法来确保具有共享节点的椎骨和椎间盘之间的无缝接触面。随后,用四面体元素各向同性填充表面网格。最后进行了仿真。我们使用来自内部数据集的30名患者对管道的性能进行了评估,该数据集包括637个椎骨和600个椎间盘。我们评估了网格质量指标和处理时间。结果:每个受试者平均21个椎体,20个IVD,每个椎体平均处理时间为4.4 min, IVD平均处理时间为31 s。在所有生成的有限元模型中,质量差的元素的平均百分比保持在2%以下,通过它们的纵横比来测量。10个椎体和7个IVD有限元模拟未能收敛。讨论:我们工作的主要目标是自动化建模和FEM模拟患者特定的椎骨和椎间盘共享节点表面直接从MRI分割。我们的管道具有生物保真度、稳健性和时效性,这标志着我们朝着研究大型患者队列以获得统计学相关的生物力学见解迈出了重要的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
2270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs. In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Micro and nanoparticles for regenerative medicine. Effects of aging-related muscle degeneration on dynamic stability during walking: a musculoskeletal computer simulation study. β-ecdysone/PLGA composite scaffolds promote skull defect healing in diabetic rat. GBR assisted in situ Onlay bone grafting for the posterior maxillary horizontal ridge augmentation: a case report and literature review. An injectable, self-healing, anti-infective, and anti-inflammatory novel glycyrrhizic acid hydrogel for promoting acute wound healing and regeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1