Preterm growth assessment: the latest findings on age correction.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1038/s41372-024-02202-z
Seham Elmrayed, Susan Dai, Abhay Lodha, Manoj Kumar, Tanis R Fenton
{"title":"Preterm growth assessment: the latest findings on age correction.","authors":"Seham Elmrayed, Susan Dai, Abhay Lodha, Manoj Kumar, Tanis R Fenton","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02202-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of age correction up to 36 months of age for growth assessments of extremely preterm (<28 weeks) and very preterm (28 to <32 weeks) infants.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This longitudinal analysis used data from the Preterm Infant Multicenter Growth Study (2001-2014).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,416 children were included (Median gestational age = 27 weeks). Chronological age-based weight, height, and head circumference z-scores were consistently lower than those based on corrected age for all ages (0, 4, 8, 21 and 36 months) by up to -5.2 (95% confidence interval -5.4, -5.1) z-scores for length at term. Using chronological age, higher proportions of children were misclassified as having suboptimal growth (up to 72.9% misdiagnosed as stunted and 89.8% misdiagnosed as underweight at term).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For extremely and very preterm children, age correction is required for all growth measures through 36 months of corrected age.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02202-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of age correction up to 36 months of age for growth assessments of extremely preterm (<28 weeks) and very preterm (28 to <32 weeks) infants.

Study design: This longitudinal analysis used data from the Preterm Infant Multicenter Growth Study (2001-2014).

Results: 1,416 children were included (Median gestational age = 27 weeks). Chronological age-based weight, height, and head circumference z-scores were consistently lower than those based on corrected age for all ages (0, 4, 8, 21 and 36 months) by up to -5.2 (95% confidence interval -5.4, -5.1) z-scores for length at term. Using chronological age, higher proportions of children were misclassified as having suboptimal growth (up to 72.9% misdiagnosed as stunted and 89.8% misdiagnosed as underweight at term).

Conclusion: For extremely and very preterm children, age correction is required for all growth measures through 36 months of corrected age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产儿生长评估:年龄校正的最新发现。
目的:评估36月龄前的年龄校正对极早产儿生长评估的影响(研究设计:该纵向分析使用了早产儿多中心生长研究(2001-2014)的数据。结果:纳入1416名儿童(中位胎龄= 27周)。在所有年龄(0、4、8、21和36个月)中,基于年龄的体重、身高和头围z-得分始终低于基于校正年龄的z-得分,最长可达-5.2(95%置信区间-5.4,-5.1)。根据实足年龄,较高比例的儿童被误诊为发育不佳(高达72.9%被误诊为发育迟缓,89.8%被误诊为足月体重不足)。结论:对于极早产儿和极早产儿,在校正年龄36个月前的所有生长测量都需要年龄校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Changes in the treatment and outcomes of different severities of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in California: a retrospective cohort study. A systematic review of Perinatal Antibiotic Stewardship - where we are, where to go? Long-term feeding outcomes after infant tracheostomy. NeoScore: a new tool to assess technical and non-technical skills during neonatal resuscitation. Preterm growth assessment: the latest findings on age correction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1