Effectiveness of Multilevel Implementation Strategies for Autism Interventions: Outcomes of Two Linked Implementation Trials.

Lauren Brookman-Frazee, Anna S Lau, Scott C Roesch, Allison Jobin, Colby Chlebowski, Melissa Mello, Barbara Caplan, Sylvie Naar, Gregory A Aarons, Aubyn C Stahmer
{"title":"Effectiveness of Multilevel Implementation Strategies for Autism Interventions: Outcomes of Two Linked Implementation Trials.","authors":"Lauren Brookman-Frazee, Anna S Lau, Scott C Roesch, Allison Jobin, Colby Chlebowski, Melissa Mello, Barbara Caplan, Sylvie Naar, Gregory A Aarons, Aubyn C Stahmer","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study tests the effectiveness of leader- and provider-level implementation strategies to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in 2 of the service systems caring for autistic children. The TEAMS Leadership Institute (TLI) targets implementation leadership and climate, and TEAMS Individualized Provider Strategy (TIPS) targets provider motivation and engagement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cluster randomized hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial tested the effects of the implementations strategies when paired with AIM HI (An Individualized Mental Health Intervention for Autism) in mental health programs (study 1) and CPRT (Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching) in classrooms (study 2). The combined sample included 65 programs/districts across 4 training cohorts (2018-2019 to 2020-2021). Organizations were randomized to receive a leader-level strategy, provider strategy, both strategies, or neither strategy (EBI provider training only). Leader and provider participants were recruited from enrolled programs/districts, and child participants were recruited from providers' caseloads or classrooms. Data from a total of 387 providers (mean age = 36.39 years; 91% female participants; 30% Latino/a/x participants) and 385 children (mean age = 9.13 years; 84% male participants; 60% Latino/a/x participants) were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed over 6 months. Provider outcome measures included provider EBI certification and observed EBI fidelity. Clinical outcome measures included the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) (study 1) and the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory (PDD-BI) (study 2). Outcomes were analyzed using intent-to-treat models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant effect of TLI on EBI Certification. TLI was associated with significantly higher EBI fidelity compared to non-TLI (B = 0.37, p = .04). Moreover, a statistically significant TLIX1Time interaction was found for child outcome T scores (B = -10.47, p = .03), with a significant reduction in T-scores across time only for those in the TLI condition. There were no significant effects of TIPS on any outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings support the effectiveness of leader-focused strategies to promote implementation and clinical outcomes of autism EBIs in multiple public service systems and for multiple EBIs.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration information: </strong>Translating Evidence-based Interventions for ASD: Multi-Level Implementation Strategy (TEAMS); https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT03380078.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.01.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study tests the effectiveness of leader- and provider-level implementation strategies to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in 2 of the service systems caring for autistic children. The TEAMS Leadership Institute (TLI) targets implementation leadership and climate, and TEAMS Individualized Provider Strategy (TIPS) targets provider motivation and engagement.

Method: A cluster randomized hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial tested the effects of the implementations strategies when paired with AIM HI (An Individualized Mental Health Intervention for Autism) in mental health programs (study 1) and CPRT (Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching) in classrooms (study 2). The combined sample included 65 programs/districts across 4 training cohorts (2018-2019 to 2020-2021). Organizations were randomized to receive a leader-level strategy, provider strategy, both strategies, or neither strategy (EBI provider training only). Leader and provider participants were recruited from enrolled programs/districts, and child participants were recruited from providers' caseloads or classrooms. Data from a total of 387 providers (mean age = 36.39 years; 91% female participants; 30% Latino/a/x participants) and 385 children (mean age = 9.13 years; 84% male participants; 60% Latino/a/x participants) were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed over 6 months. Provider outcome measures included provider EBI certification and observed EBI fidelity. Clinical outcome measures included the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) (study 1) and the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory (PDD-BI) (study 2). Outcomes were analyzed using intent-to-treat models.

Results: There was no significant effect of TLI on EBI Certification. TLI was associated with significantly higher EBI fidelity compared to non-TLI (B = 0.37, p = .04). Moreover, a statistically significant TLIX1Time interaction was found for child outcome T scores (B = -10.47, p = .03), with a significant reduction in T-scores across time only for those in the TLI condition. There were no significant effects of TIPS on any outcomes.

Conclusion: Findings support the effectiveness of leader-focused strategies to promote implementation and clinical outcomes of autism EBIs in multiple public service systems and for multiple EBIs.

Clinical trial registration information: Translating Evidence-based Interventions for ASD: Multi-Level Implementation Strategy (TEAMS); https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT03380078.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症干预多层次实施策略的有效性:两个相关实施试验的结果。
目的:本研究考察了两种自闭症儿童服务体系中领导者和提供者层面实施策略实施循证干预的有效性。TEAMS领导力研究所(TLI)的目标是实施领导力和氛围,TEAMS个性化供应商战略(TIPS)的目标是供应商的动机和参与度。方法:一项聚类随机混合3型实施有效性试验测试了实施策略与AIM HI(自闭症个体化心理健康干预)在心理健康项目(研究1)和CPRT(课堂关键反应教学)在课堂(研究2)中的配对效果。合并样本包括四个培训队列(2018-2019年至2020-2021年)的65个项目/地区。组织随机接受领导级战略、提供者战略、两种战略或两种战略(仅EBI提供者培训)。领导者和提供者参与者从已登记的项目/地区招募,儿童参与者从提供者的病例或教室招募。数据来自387名提供者(平均年龄36.39岁;91%的参与者为女性;30%拉丁裔/a/x参与者)和385名儿童(平均年龄= 9.13岁;84%为男性;分析了60%拉丁裔/a/x参与者)/评估了6个月的结果。提供者结果测量包括提供者EBI认证和观察到的EBI保真度。临床结果测量包括Eyberg儿童行为量表(ECBI)(研究1)和广泛性发育障碍行为量表(PDD-BI)(研究2)。使用意向治疗模型分析结果。结果:TLI对EBI认证无显著影响。与非TLI相比,TLI与更高的EBI保真度显著相关(B=。37岁的p = .04点)。此外,TLIXTime与儿童结局t -评分存在显著的交互作用(B=-10.47, p=.03),仅TLI患儿的t -评分随时间显著降低。TIPS对任何结果均无显著影响。结论:研究结果支持了以领导者为中心的策略在促进自闭症ebi在多个公共服务系统和多个ebi中的实施和临床结果的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
期刊最新文献
Crafting Reflections: A Guide to Sharing Your Story in JAACAP. Utilizing the Complex Racial Trauma Framework to Understand Trauma Symptoms in Racially Minoritized Youth. Evaluation of a Longitudinal Virtual Research Workshop Series in Fostering Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Research Interests Among Diverse Trainees. Editorial: Disparities in Mental Health Care Access Prior to Youth Suicide: Implications for Research and Upstream Prevention. Editorial: Unraveling the Mechanisms of Parenting Programs in Reducing Disruptive Behavior in Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1