Relationship between the learning gains and learning style preferences among students from the school of medicine and health sciences.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06554-0
Blanca Bazán-Perkins, José Alfredo Santibañez-Salgado
{"title":"Relationship between the learning gains and learning style preferences among students from the school of medicine and health sciences.","authors":"Blanca Bazán-Perkins, José Alfredo Santibañez-Salgado","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06554-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The field of health sciences is constantly evolving, presenting significant challenges to student learning performance. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the factors influencing students' learning style preferences, as these relate to how they acquire, understand, interpret, organize, and process information from their courses. In this study, we evaluated whether there is a relationship between students' learning style preferences and their learning gains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted between 2021 and 2022 using a convenience sampling approach with students of the School of Medicine and Health Sciences at the Mexico City Campus of Tecnológico de Monterrey. Students completed online questionnaires to assess normalized learning gains, as well as preference questionnaires from the VARK inventory (Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetic types of learning preferences) and the Felder-Silverman learning style model, which is a framework that categorizes learners based on their preferences across several dimensions: active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, visual/verbal, and sequential/global. Descriptive statistics and Spearman's correlation were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In relation to the VARK inventory, students exhibited a tendency to prefer multimodal sensory learning, particularly favoring the kinesthetic style. The number of VARK styles and the preference for kinesthetic learning were significantly correlated with learning gains. The Felder-Silverman test indicated that students preferred sensing, visual, and sequential learning; however, the levels of preference for active, intuitive, and sequential learning were associated with higher learning gains. Reflective learning demonstrated an inverse correlation with learning gains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate the importance of incorporating experience and practical skills in the classroom. Additionally, it is recommended that students work collaboratively, share and discuss learning materials, foster innovation and abstract learning, and follow logical and sequential approaches to optimize their educational achievements. It is fundamental to find learning models that improve the academic performance of students with a reflective learning preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06554-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The field of health sciences is constantly evolving, presenting significant challenges to student learning performance. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the factors influencing students' learning style preferences, as these relate to how they acquire, understand, interpret, organize, and process information from their courses. In this study, we evaluated whether there is a relationship between students' learning style preferences and their learning gains.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between 2021 and 2022 using a convenience sampling approach with students of the School of Medicine and Health Sciences at the Mexico City Campus of Tecnológico de Monterrey. Students completed online questionnaires to assess normalized learning gains, as well as preference questionnaires from the VARK inventory (Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetic types of learning preferences) and the Felder-Silverman learning style model, which is a framework that categorizes learners based on their preferences across several dimensions: active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, visual/verbal, and sequential/global. Descriptive statistics and Spearman's correlation were used to analyze the data.

Results: In relation to the VARK inventory, students exhibited a tendency to prefer multimodal sensory learning, particularly favoring the kinesthetic style. The number of VARK styles and the preference for kinesthetic learning were significantly correlated with learning gains. The Felder-Silverman test indicated that students preferred sensing, visual, and sequential learning; however, the levels of preference for active, intuitive, and sequential learning were associated with higher learning gains. Reflective learning demonstrated an inverse correlation with learning gains.

Conclusion: Our results indicate the importance of incorporating experience and practical skills in the classroom. Additionally, it is recommended that students work collaboratively, share and discuss learning materials, foster innovation and abstract learning, and follow logical and sequential approaches to optimize their educational achievements. It is fundamental to find learning models that improve the academic performance of students with a reflective learning preference.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学与健康科学学院学生学习收获与学习方式偏好的关系
背景:健康科学领域不断发展,对学生的学习表现提出了重大挑战。因此,确定影响学生学习风格偏好的因素至关重要,因为这些因素与他们如何从课程中获取、理解、解释、组织和处理信息有关。在本研究中,我们评估了学生的学习风格偏好与他们的学习成果之间是否存在关系。方法:采用便捷抽样方法,在2021年至2022年间对Tecnológico de Monterrey墨西哥城校区医学与健康科学学院的学生进行了横断面研究。学生们完成了评估标准化学习收益的在线问卷,以及来自VARK量表(视觉、听觉、阅读/写作和动觉类型的学习偏好)和费尔德-西尔弗曼学习风格模型的偏好问卷。费尔德-西尔弗曼学习风格模型是一个框架,根据学习者的偏好在几个维度上进行分类:主动/反思、感知/直觉、视觉/口头和顺序/全局。采用描述性统计和Spearman相关法对数据进行分析。结果:在VARK量表中,学生表现出对多模态感官学习的偏好,尤其是对动觉式学习的偏好。VARK风格的数量和对动觉学习的偏好与学习收益显著相关。费尔德-西尔弗曼测验表明,学生倾向于感觉学习、视觉学习和顺序学习;然而,主动、直觉和顺序学习的偏好水平与更高的学习收益相关。反思性学习与学习收益呈负相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明在课堂上结合经验和实践技能的重要性。此外,建议学生合作,分享和讨论学习材料,促进创新和抽象学习,并遵循逻辑和顺序的方法来优化他们的教育成果。找到能够提高具有反思性学习偏好的学生学习成绩的学习模式是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of deliberate practices versus conventional lecture in trauma training for medical students. Outcome-based simulation training for ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: clinical impact on preventing mechanical complications. Assessing the role of medical entomology in general medicine education in Iran: expert perspectives and curriculum implications. Brain drain in Emergency Medicine in Lebanon, building locally and exporting globally. Development and validation of a tool to measure telehealth educational environment (THEEM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1