Turning nursing students' mistakes into resources for learning in simulation-based training: facilitators' assumptions about providing feedback in debriefing.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06628-z
Wenche Lervik, Mads Solberg, Astrid Camilla Wiig, Helen Berg
{"title":"Turning nursing students' mistakes into resources for learning in simulation-based training: facilitators' assumptions about providing feedback in debriefing.","authors":"Wenche Lervik, Mads Solberg, Astrid Camilla Wiig, Helen Berg","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06628-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate how facilitators approach and use nursing students' mistakes in simulation-based training as learning resources in the simulation debriefing phase. Facilitators are responsible for raising students' awareness of their performances during the debriefing and facilitating reflections on their performances, including satisfactory behaviours and performance gaps. Research on facilitators' work during debriefing has highlighted various challenges, such as providing a safe and constructive climate among novice students while simultaneously teaching them the correct procedures, methods, and knowledge of caring practices to become professional nurses. There is a lack of research on how facilitators approach, handle, and use students' mistakes as a learning resource. Thus, this study investigated facilitators' assumptions about providing feedback to nursing students when they made mistakes during simulation-based training METHOD: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine experienced facilitators from three universities in Norway. Data were analyzed following the principles of thematic analysis (TA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators made varying assumptions about the simulations and debriefings as learning processes. These differences were evident in their accounts of how feedback was provided to students when they made mistakes during the simulation-based training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facilitators' statements about their practices reflect assumptions about how they make simulation activities a resource for meaningful learning, including how to use students' mistakes as learning opportunities during debriefing discussions. Consequently, these assumptions regarding learning provide valuable insights into the ambiguous and complex praxis of using simulation-based training as a professional educational tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06628-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how facilitators approach and use nursing students' mistakes in simulation-based training as learning resources in the simulation debriefing phase. Facilitators are responsible for raising students' awareness of their performances during the debriefing and facilitating reflections on their performances, including satisfactory behaviours and performance gaps. Research on facilitators' work during debriefing has highlighted various challenges, such as providing a safe and constructive climate among novice students while simultaneously teaching them the correct procedures, methods, and knowledge of caring practices to become professional nurses. There is a lack of research on how facilitators approach, handle, and use students' mistakes as a learning resource. Thus, this study investigated facilitators' assumptions about providing feedback to nursing students when they made mistakes during simulation-based training METHOD: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine experienced facilitators from three universities in Norway. Data were analyzed following the principles of thematic analysis (TA).

Results: Facilitators made varying assumptions about the simulations and debriefings as learning processes. These differences were evident in their accounts of how feedback was provided to students when they made mistakes during the simulation-based training.

Conclusion: Facilitators' statements about their practices reflect assumptions about how they make simulation activities a resource for meaningful learning, including how to use students' mistakes as learning opportunities during debriefing discussions. Consequently, these assumptions regarding learning provide valuable insights into the ambiguous and complex praxis of using simulation-based training as a professional educational tool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在模拟训练中将护理学生的错误转化为学习资源:引导者对汇报中提供反馈的假设。
背景:本研究的目的是探讨辅导员如何处理和利用护理学生在模拟培训中的错误作为模拟述职阶段的学习资源。辅导员负责在汇报过程中提高学生对自己表现的认识,并促使学生反思自己的表现,包括令人满意的行为和表现差距。在汇报过程中对辅导员工作的研究突出了各种挑战,例如为新手提供安全和建设性的氛围,同时教他们成为专业护士的正确程序、方法和护理实践知识。关于辅导员如何处理、处理和利用学生的错误作为学习资源的研究还很缺乏。因此,本研究调查了辅导员对护理学生在模拟培训中犯错时提供反馈的假设。方法:对来自挪威三所大学的九名经验丰富的辅导员进行了个人半结构化访谈。数据分析遵循主题分析(TA)的原则。结果:辅导员对模拟和汇报作为学习过程做出了不同的假设。当学生在模拟训练中犯错误时,他们如何向学生提供反馈,这些差异在他们的描述中很明显。结论:引导者关于他们的实践的陈述反映了他们如何将模拟活动作为有意义的学习资源的假设,包括如何在汇报讨论中将学生的错误作为学习机会。因此,这些关于学习的假设为使用基于模拟的培训作为专业教育工具的模糊和复杂的实践提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of deliberate practices versus conventional lecture in trauma training for medical students. Outcome-based simulation training for ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: clinical impact on preventing mechanical complications. Assessing the role of medical entomology in general medicine education in Iran: expert perspectives and curriculum implications. Brain drain in Emergency Medicine in Lebanon, building locally and exporting globally. Development and validation of a tool to measure telehealth educational environment (THEEM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1