Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional analysis of glycemic controls and brain health outcomes.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2025.2450084
Chien-Ning Huang, Hsiao-Mei Chen, Bei-Yi Su
{"title":"Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional analysis of glycemic controls and brain health outcomes.","authors":"Chien-Ning Huang, Hsiao-Mei Chen, Bei-Yi Su","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2450084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this cross-sectional analysis, we explored how fluctuations in glycemic levels impact executive functions and psychosocial outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The goal was to understand the relationship between glycemic control and both neuropsychological and psychosocial health. We stratified participants into well-controlled and poorly controlled groups based on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and variability, including a healthy control group for comparison. The study consisted of neuropsychological tests and psychosocial assessments. Results indicated that the poorly controlled T2DM group experienced significant executive dysfunction and scored lower on the Tower of London, Wisconsin Card Sorting, and Digit Span Tests, reflecting a broader impact on quality of life and resilience. These findings support the importance of maintaining stable glycemic levels for better executive and psychosocial outcomes and highlight the need for regular neuropsychological and psychosocial assessments in diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2450084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this cross-sectional analysis, we explored how fluctuations in glycemic levels impact executive functions and psychosocial outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The goal was to understand the relationship between glycemic control and both neuropsychological and psychosocial health. We stratified participants into well-controlled and poorly controlled groups based on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and variability, including a healthy control group for comparison. The study consisted of neuropsychological tests and psychosocial assessments. Results indicated that the poorly controlled T2DM group experienced significant executive dysfunction and scored lower on the Tower of London, Wisconsin Card Sorting, and Digit Span Tests, reflecting a broader impact on quality of life and resilience. These findings support the importance of maintaining stable glycemic levels for better executive and psychosocial outcomes and highlight the need for regular neuropsychological and psychosocial assessments in diabetes care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病:血糖控制和脑健康结果的横断面分析
在这项横断面分析中,我们探讨了血糖水平的波动如何影响2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的执行功能和心理社会结局。目的是了解血糖控制与神经心理和社会心理健康之间的关系。我们根据糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平和变异性将参与者分为控制良好组和控制不良组,包括一个健康对照组进行比较。该研究包括神经心理学测试和社会心理评估。结果表明,控制不佳的T2DM组出现了明显的执行功能障碍,在伦敦塔、威斯康星卡片分类和数字广度测试中得分较低,反映了对生活质量和恢复能力的更广泛影响。这些发现支持了维持稳定的血糖水平对于更好的执行和社会心理结果的重要性,并强调了在糖尿病护理中定期进行神经心理学和社会心理评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Biopsychosocial and contextual pressures: Contributions to a metatheoretical disorder theory from neuroscience, evolutionary, developmental, and ecological perspectives. Incorrect encoding responses improve the classification accuracy of the Word Choice Test. Depression and quality of life in patients with Broca's and subcortical stroke-related aphasia: A comparative study. Cross-cultural comparison of performance on the multicultural neuropsychological scale between participants from Argentina and the United States of America. Detecting simulated symptoms in chronic pain and fibromyalgia: A two-study evaluation of the Italian version of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1