Biopsychosocial and contextual pressures: Contributions to a metatheoretical disorder theory from neuroscience, evolutionary, developmental, and ecological perspectives.
{"title":"Biopsychosocial and contextual pressures: Contributions to a metatheoretical disorder theory from neuroscience, evolutionary, developmental, and ecological perspectives.","authors":"Bruno Faustino","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2469249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human internal and external pressures that drive cognition, emotion, motivation, and interpersonal behavior are critical aspects of clinical psychology and psychotherapy's perspectives on psychopathology. Different theoretical orientations suggest that difficulties with emotional needs, interpersonal motivations, psychosocial stages, and maturational tasks lie at the core of psychopathology. From an evolutionary and neurobiological perspective, several affective systems were shaped through the interaction between genetic and environmental pressures and can be described as the neural basis for several emotion-based behavioral tendencies. However, efforts to integrate these constructs from basic neural science, evolutionary psychology, and clinical psychology have been sparse. In this sense, the present article aims to briefly review the literature on such clinically relevant constructs and make a proposal in a coherent metatheoretical perspective to integrate and make sense of these phenomena as an unified rationale. From affective neuroscience to evolutionary psychology, developmental psychopathology, and ecological systems perspectives, biopsychosocial and contextual pressures are suggested as a heuristic for a contemporary, coherent, and transtheoretical theory of the disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2469249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human internal and external pressures that drive cognition, emotion, motivation, and interpersonal behavior are critical aspects of clinical psychology and psychotherapy's perspectives on psychopathology. Different theoretical orientations suggest that difficulties with emotional needs, interpersonal motivations, psychosocial stages, and maturational tasks lie at the core of psychopathology. From an evolutionary and neurobiological perspective, several affective systems were shaped through the interaction between genetic and environmental pressures and can be described as the neural basis for several emotion-based behavioral tendencies. However, efforts to integrate these constructs from basic neural science, evolutionary psychology, and clinical psychology have been sparse. In this sense, the present article aims to briefly review the literature on such clinically relevant constructs and make a proposal in a coherent metatheoretical perspective to integrate and make sense of these phenomena as an unified rationale. From affective neuroscience to evolutionary psychology, developmental psychopathology, and ecological systems perspectives, biopsychosocial and contextual pressures are suggested as a heuristic for a contemporary, coherent, and transtheoretical theory of the disorder.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.