Communicating certainty via verbal probability phrases: comparing health contexts with no context.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02687-9
Yiyun Shou, Lok Him Lee, Joey Elizabeth Yeo, Michael Smithson
{"title":"Communicating certainty via verbal probability phrases: comparing health contexts with no context.","authors":"Yiyun Shou, Lok Him Lee, Joey Elizabeth Yeo, Michael Smithson","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02687-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical professionals often use verbal phrases to communicate uncertainties and certainties with their patients and the general public.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate factors that can influence people's interpretation of probability phrases of certainty and uncertainty communicated by doctors in health and medical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental study with a randomized factorial design was conducted to examine both context-related factors and individual difference factors on participants' interpretation across directions of phrases and frames of the context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Context significantly influenced participants' interpretation of probability phrases regardless of their level of certainty. Participants' self-reported prior beliefs were the main driver of this context effect. When participants were in a state of uncertainty, their reliance on experts significantly reduced the prior beliefs' effect. Finally, refuting probability phrases might provide more reassurance than affirming phrases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People may perceive the outcomes communicated by doctors differently from what the doctors intend to convey, depending on their prior beliefs, reliance on doctors and the direction of phrases. When communicating uncertainties and certainties with patients and general public, it is important for medical professionals to understand audience's prior experiences, and to foster medical trust and audience's reliance on medical professionals to reduce bias in clinical risk communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02687-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical professionals often use verbal phrases to communicate uncertainties and certainties with their patients and the general public.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate factors that can influence people's interpretation of probability phrases of certainty and uncertainty communicated by doctors in health and medical settings.

Methods: An experimental study with a randomized factorial design was conducted to examine both context-related factors and individual difference factors on participants' interpretation across directions of phrases and frames of the context.

Results: Context significantly influenced participants' interpretation of probability phrases regardless of their level of certainty. Participants' self-reported prior beliefs were the main driver of this context effect. When participants were in a state of uncertainty, their reliance on experts significantly reduced the prior beliefs' effect. Finally, refuting probability phrases might provide more reassurance than affirming phrases.

Conclusion: People may perceive the outcomes communicated by doctors differently from what the doctors intend to convey, depending on their prior beliefs, reliance on doctors and the direction of phrases. When communicating uncertainties and certainties with patients and general public, it is important for medical professionals to understand audience's prior experiences, and to foster medical trust and audience's reliance on medical professionals to reduce bias in clinical risk communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过口头概率短语传达确定性:比较健康情境与无情境。
医学专业人员经常使用口头短语与他们的病人和公众沟通不确定性和确定性。目的:本研究旨在探讨影响人们对健康和医疗环境中医生传达的确定性和不确定性概率短语的解释的因素。方法:采用随机因子设计的实验研究,考察情境相关因素和个体差异因素对情境短语和语境框架跨方向解释的影响。结果:情境显著影响参与者对概率短语的解释,无论他们的确定性水平如何。参与者自我报告的先验信念是这种情境效应的主要驱动因素。当参与者处于不确定状态时,他们对专家的依赖显著降低了先验信念的影响。最后,反驳概率短语可能比肯定短语更能让人安心。结论:人们对医生传达的结果的感知可能与医生想要传达的结果有所不同,这取决于他们的先验信念、对医生的依赖程度和短语的方向。在与患者和公众沟通不确定性和确定性时,医疗专业人员必须了解受众之前的经验,培养医疗信任和受众对医疗专业人员的依赖,以减少临床风险沟通中的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of regular medical visits in mitigating increased suicide risk during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Kobe, Japan. Exploring the general practitioners' perception of the inter-professional care of rheumatoid arthritis patients (GEPRA-II): a qualitative interview study. Evaluation of musculoskeletal complaints, treatment approaches, and patient perceptions in family medicine clinics in a tertiary center in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. Communicating certainty via verbal probability phrases: comparing health contexts with no context. Investigating assumptions in motivational interviewing among general practitioners: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1