Investigating assumptions in motivational interviewing among general practitioners: a qualitative study.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02706-3
Paul Aujoulat, Amélie Manac'h, Catherine Le Reste, Delphine Le Goff, Jean Yves Le Reste, Marie Barais
{"title":"Investigating assumptions in motivational interviewing among general practitioners: a qualitative study.","authors":"Paul Aujoulat, Amélie Manac'h, Catherine Le Reste, Delphine Le Goff, Jean Yves Le Reste, Marie Barais","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02706-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unhealthy behaviours contributing to cardiovascular issues, diabetes, strokes, and cancer, pose significant health risks. General practitioners (GPs) are pivotal in guiding behaviour change, with Motivational Interviewing (MI) showing promise. MI, developed by William Miller and Stephen Rollnick, aims to enhance motivation for change. Despite its efficacy in areas like smoking cessation and weight loss, its uptake among French GPs remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was to explore GPs' understanding of MI, its perceived benefits and the obstacles to its implementation in western Brittany (Finistère). Semi-structured interviews, conducted by two female trainees, explored MI knowledge, benefits, and barriers with a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2020 and May 2021, 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs. Participants had a limited understanding of MI, often confusing it with persuasion. MI was seen as a patient-centered tool fostering behavioural change, with reported benefits in cancer screening, chronic disease management, and vaccination. However, barriers such as time constraints, limited training availability, and systemic issues hinder its adoption. Participants emphasized MI's utility for challenging cases but noted it was unnecessary for engaged patients. MI could also enhance doctor-patient relationships and physician satisfaction. Overcoming barriers requires addressing logistical issues, integrating MI into training, and promoting its long-term efficiency to improve healthcare outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted GPs' limited knowledge of MI but recognized its value in promoting patient-centered care and behaviour change. GPs identified its potential in areas like cancer screening, chronic disease management, and vaccine hesitancy while noting barriers such as time constraints and insufficient training. Addressing these challenges through better integration into training and practice could enhance patient outcomes and provider satisfaction. Focused efforts are needed to translate MI's potential into routine clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02706-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unhealthy behaviours contributing to cardiovascular issues, diabetes, strokes, and cancer, pose significant health risks. General practitioners (GPs) are pivotal in guiding behaviour change, with Motivational Interviewing (MI) showing promise. MI, developed by William Miller and Stephen Rollnick, aims to enhance motivation for change. Despite its efficacy in areas like smoking cessation and weight loss, its uptake among French GPs remains uncertain.

Methods: This qualitative study was to explore GPs' understanding of MI, its perceived benefits and the obstacles to its implementation in western Brittany (Finistère). Semi-structured interviews, conducted by two female trainees, explored MI knowledge, benefits, and barriers with a thematic analysis.

Results: Between November 2020 and May 2021, 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs. Participants had a limited understanding of MI, often confusing it with persuasion. MI was seen as a patient-centered tool fostering behavioural change, with reported benefits in cancer screening, chronic disease management, and vaccination. However, barriers such as time constraints, limited training availability, and systemic issues hinder its adoption. Participants emphasized MI's utility for challenging cases but noted it was unnecessary for engaged patients. MI could also enhance doctor-patient relationships and physician satisfaction. Overcoming barriers requires addressing logistical issues, integrating MI into training, and promoting its long-term efficiency to improve healthcare outcomes.

Conclusion: This study highlighted GPs' limited knowledge of MI but recognized its value in promoting patient-centered care and behaviour change. GPs identified its potential in areas like cancer screening, chronic disease management, and vaccine hesitancy while noting barriers such as time constraints and insufficient training. Addressing these challenges through better integration into training and practice could enhance patient outcomes and provider satisfaction. Focused efforts are needed to translate MI's potential into routine clinical use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查全科医生动机性访谈中的假设:一项定性研究。
背景:导致心血管问题、糖尿病、中风和癌症的不健康行为构成重大的健康风险。全科医生(gp)在指导行为改变方面起着关键作用,动机访谈(MI)显示出了希望。由威廉·米勒(William Miller)和斯蒂芬·罗尼克(Stephen Rollnick)开发的MI旨在增强变革的动机。尽管它在戒烟和减肥等方面很有效,但它在法国全科医生中的普及程度仍不确定。方法:本定性研究旨在探讨全科医生对MI的理解、其感知到的益处以及在布列塔尼西部实施MI的障碍。由两位女性学员进行的半结构化访谈,通过专题分析探讨了人工智能知识、益处和障碍。结果:在2020年11月至2021年5月期间,对全科医生进行了11次半结构化访谈。参与者对MI的理解有限,经常将其与说服混淆。MI被视为一种以患者为中心的促进行为改变的工具,据报道在癌症筛查、慢性疾病管理和疫苗接种方面具有益处。然而,诸如时间限制、有限的培训可用性和系统问题等障碍阻碍了其采用。与会者强调心肌梗死对挑战性病例的效用,但指出对参与的患者没有必要。心肌梗死还可以增强医患关系和医生满意度。克服障碍需要解决后勤问题,将人工智能整合到培训中,并提高其长期效率,以改善医疗保健结果。结论:本研究强调了全科医生对心肌梗死的知识有限,但认识到其在促进以患者为中心的护理和行为改变方面的价值。全科医生确定了它在癌症筛查、慢性病管理和疫苗犹豫等领域的潜力,同时指出了时间限制和培训不足等障碍。通过更好地将这些挑战整合到培训和实践中,可以提高患者的治疗效果和提供者的满意度。需要集中努力将心肌梗死的潜力转化为常规临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of regular medical visits in mitigating increased suicide risk during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Kobe, Japan. Exploring the general practitioners' perception of the inter-professional care of rheumatoid arthritis patients (GEPRA-II): a qualitative interview study. Evaluation of musculoskeletal complaints, treatment approaches, and patient perceptions in family medicine clinics in a tertiary center in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. Communicating certainty via verbal probability phrases: comparing health contexts with no context. Investigating assumptions in motivational interviewing among general practitioners: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1