Exploring the general practitioners' perception of the inter-professional care of rheumatoid arthritis patients (GEPRA-II): a qualitative interview study.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02713-4
Anne-Laure Yailian, Audrey Janoly-Dumenil, Emmanuelle Vignot, Aurélie Fontana, Charline Estublier, Cyrille Confavreux, Roland Chapurlat, Claude Dussart, Humbert de Freminville
{"title":"Exploring the general practitioners' perception of the inter-professional care of rheumatoid arthritis patients (GEPRA-II): a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Anne-Laure Yailian, Audrey Janoly-Dumenil, Emmanuelle Vignot, Aurélie Fontana, Charline Estublier, Cyrille Confavreux, Roland Chapurlat, Claude Dussart, Humbert de Freminville","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02713-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A lack of medication adherence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been reported. Inter-professional collaborations seem essential for an optimal therapeutic management of patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the barriers and facilitators of general practitioners (GPs) for the implementation of collaborative support programmes in RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative semi-structured study using face-to-face or telephone interviews was conducted. Eligible participants included French GPs referring patients with RA. Interviews were audio-recorded and then transcribed. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework with Nvivo<sup>®</sup>12 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen GPs were interviewed between August 2019 and February 2020. Five themes were identified in the care of their patients with RA. GPs reported being mainly involved in diagnosis and orientation, and frequently asked for pain management and explanation/reformulation of previously given information. They perceived their patients to be adherent to their treatments, although they frequently identified reasons for non-adherence. Regarding their perception of the community-hospital relationship, they sometimes considered it insufficient and expected more immediate interactions. Additionally, most interviewed GPs had no expectation regarding increased collaborations with community pharmacists (CPs) and several GPs were motivated to be more involved in a patient support programme. However, barriers were identified: lack of time and training, and insufficient payment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a collaborative patient support programme in RA should be developed taking into account the barriers and facilitators identified by GPs who appeared to be aware of the causes of potential non-adherence, and were particularly interested in receiving more information about the therapeutic monitoring of patients by hospital professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02713-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A lack of medication adherence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been reported. Inter-professional collaborations seem essential for an optimal therapeutic management of patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the barriers and facilitators of general practitioners (GPs) for the implementation of collaborative support programmes in RA.

Methods: A qualitative semi-structured study using face-to-face or telephone interviews was conducted. Eligible participants included French GPs referring patients with RA. Interviews were audio-recorded and then transcribed. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework with Nvivo®12 software.

Results: Nineteen GPs were interviewed between August 2019 and February 2020. Five themes were identified in the care of their patients with RA. GPs reported being mainly involved in diagnosis and orientation, and frequently asked for pain management and explanation/reformulation of previously given information. They perceived their patients to be adherent to their treatments, although they frequently identified reasons for non-adherence. Regarding their perception of the community-hospital relationship, they sometimes considered it insufficient and expected more immediate interactions. Additionally, most interviewed GPs had no expectation regarding increased collaborations with community pharmacists (CPs) and several GPs were motivated to be more involved in a patient support programme. However, barriers were identified: lack of time and training, and insufficient payment.

Conclusions: The implementation of a collaborative patient support programme in RA should be developed taking into account the barriers and facilitators identified by GPs who appeared to be aware of the causes of potential non-adherence, and were particularly interested in receiving more information about the therapeutic monitoring of patients by hospital professionals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨全科医生对类风湿关节炎患者跨专业护理的认知(GEPRA-II):一项定性访谈研究。
背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者缺乏药物依从性已有报道。跨专业合作似乎对患者的最佳治疗管理至关重要。本研究的目的是分析全科医生(gp)在RA中实施协作支持计划的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用面对面或电话访谈进行定性半结构化研究。符合条件的参与者包括法国全科医生转诊RA患者。采访录音,然后转录。数据分析使用Braun和Clarke的专题分析框架和Nvivo®12软件。结果:2019年8月至2020年2月,对19名全科医生进行了访谈。在他们的类风湿性关节炎患者的护理中确定了五个主题。全科医生报告主要参与诊断和定向,并经常要求疼痛管理和解释/重新表述先前给出的信息。他们认为他们的病人坚持他们的治疗,尽管他们经常找出不坚持的原因。关于他们对社区医院关系的看法,他们有时认为这种关系不足,并期望更直接的互动。此外,大多数受访的全科医生对增加与社区药剂师(CPs)的合作没有期望,一些全科医生有动力更多地参与患者支持计划。然而,也发现了一些障碍:缺乏时间和培训,以及报酬不足。结论:在RA患者协作支持计划的实施中,应考虑到全科医生确定的障碍和促进因素,这些全科医生似乎意识到潜在的不依从性的原因,并且对医院专业人员对患者治疗监测的更多信息特别感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work preferences and motivations of young general practitioners in Switzerland: findings from a cross-sectional survey of the Swiss Young General Practitioners Association (JHaS). Clinical and cost effectiveness of nurse led-structured management of diarrhoea predominant irritable bowel syndrome in primary care (Lincolnshire POACHER study); a randomised control trial. Association of serum albumin level, feeding route, and mobility status with pressure ulcer presence in bedridden adults receiving long-term care. What do patients and clinicians think about interventions which prioritise continuity for certain patients in primary care? Evaluating the participatory processes within the OECD PaRIS project in Saskatchewan: lessons learned about recruitment and engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1