Spacetime surgery for black hole fireworks

IF 5.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/098
Wei-Chen Lin, Dong-han Yeom and Dejan Stojkovic
{"title":"Spacetime surgery for black hole fireworks","authors":"Wei-Chen Lin, Dong-han Yeom and Dejan Stojkovic","doi":"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We construct an explicit model for the black hole to white hole transition (known as the black hole fireworks scenario) using the cut-and-paste technique. We model a black hole collapse using the evolution of a time-like shell in the background of the loop quantum gravity inspired metric and then the space-like shell analysis to construct the firework geometry. Our simple and well-defined analysis removes some subtle issues that were present in the previous literature [1] and makes the examination of the junction conditions easier. We further point out that the infalling and asymptotic observers, both in ours and the original scenario in ref. [1], encounter quite different physics. While the proper time of the bounce for an infalling observer can be determined without ambiguity, the bouncing time interval for the asymptotic observer can be chosen arbitrarily by changing how one cuts and pastes the spacetimes outside the event horizons. It is puzzling that the proper time of a distant (rather than infalling) observer is subject to randomness since the infalling observer is supposed to experience a stronger quantum gravity effect. This result might suggest that a black hole firework scenario does not allow for the existence of an effectively classical spacetime inside the horizon. The main message is therefore that even if we strictly follow the thin shell formalism to cut and paste spacetimes, this does not guarantee that the resulting spacetime offers a physically reasonable background.","PeriodicalId":15445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We construct an explicit model for the black hole to white hole transition (known as the black hole fireworks scenario) using the cut-and-paste technique. We model a black hole collapse using the evolution of a time-like shell in the background of the loop quantum gravity inspired metric and then the space-like shell analysis to construct the firework geometry. Our simple and well-defined analysis removes some subtle issues that were present in the previous literature [1] and makes the examination of the junction conditions easier. We further point out that the infalling and asymptotic observers, both in ours and the original scenario in ref. [1], encounter quite different physics. While the proper time of the bounce for an infalling observer can be determined without ambiguity, the bouncing time interval for the asymptotic observer can be chosen arbitrarily by changing how one cuts and pastes the spacetimes outside the event horizons. It is puzzling that the proper time of a distant (rather than infalling) observer is subject to randomness since the infalling observer is supposed to experience a stronger quantum gravity effect. This result might suggest that a black hole firework scenario does not allow for the existence of an effectively classical spacetime inside the horizon. The main message is therefore that even if we strictly follow the thin shell formalism to cut and paste spacetimes, this does not guarantee that the resulting spacetime offers a physically reasonable background.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑洞烟花的时空手术
我们使用剪切粘贴技术为黑洞到白洞的转变(称为黑洞烟花场景)构建了一个显式模型。在环量子引力激励度规的背景下,我们利用类时壳的演化来模拟黑洞坍缩,然后利用类空壳分析来构造烟花几何。我们简单而明确的分析消除了以前文献中存在的一些微妙问题[1],并使连接点条件的检查更容易。我们进一步指出,在我们的和参考文献[1]的原始情景中,落体和渐近的观察者遇到了完全不同的物理现象。对于落入的观测者来说,弹跳的适当时间可以毫无歧义地确定,而对于渐近观测者来说,弹跳的时间间隔可以通过改变在事件视界外剪切和粘贴时空的方式来任意选择。令人困惑的是,一个遥远的(而不是坠落的)观察者的固有时间受制于随机性,因为坠落的观察者应该经历更强的量子引力效应。这一结果可能表明,黑洞烟花场景不允许视界内存在有效的经典时空。因此,主要的信息是,即使我们严格遵循薄壳形式来剪切和粘贴时空,这也不能保证所得到的时空提供一个物理上合理的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
23.40%
发文量
632
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (JCAP) encompasses theoretical, observational and experimental areas as well as computation and simulation. The journal covers the latest developments in the theory of all fundamental interactions and their cosmological implications (e.g. M-theory and cosmology, brane cosmology). JCAP''s coverage also includes topics such as formation, dynamics and clustering of galaxies, pre-galactic star formation, x-ray astronomy, radio astronomy, gravitational lensing, active galactic nuclei, intergalactic and interstellar matter.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting primordial black holes formation from preheating instabilities: the case of Starobinsky inflation Forecast analysis of astrophysical stochastic gravitational wave background beyond general relativity: a case study on brans-dicke gravity Confronting new NICER mass-radius measurements with phase transition in dense matter and twin compact stars Wide binary evaporation by dark solitons: implications from the GAIA catalog Gravitational Faraday-Cartan effect beyond gravitomagnetism due to dark matter intrinsic spin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1