Effect of long and short half-life PDE5 inhibitors on HbA1c levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103035
Joseph Kim, Rui Zhao, Lawrence Richard Kleinberg, Kitai Kim
{"title":"Effect of long and short half-life PDE5 inhibitors on HbA1c levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Joseph Kim, Rui Zhao, Lawrence Richard Kleinberg, Kitai Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, owing to their mechanism of action, have been gaining recognition as a potential case of drug repurposing and combination therapy for diabetes treatment. We aimed to examine the effect of long and short half-life PDE5 inhibitors have on Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people with elevated HbA1c (>6%) to assess mean difference in HbA1c levels from baseline versus controls after any PDE5 inhibitor intervention of ≥4 weeks, excluding multiple interventions. Cochrane CENTRAL, PMC Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP were searched without language restrictions up to September 30, 2024. Summary data from published data were extracted. PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines used to extract and assess data using a random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with the Research Registry, reviewregistry1733.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 1096 studies identified, in analysis of 13 studies with 1083 baseline patients, long half-life PDE5 inhibitors (tadalafil, PF-00489791) had decreases in HbA1c while short half-life PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, avanafil) had no change. Five (38.5%) studies had a low risk of bias, and eight (61.5%) had some concerns. Long half-life inhibitors had significant mean decrease of -0.40% ([-0.66, -0.14], p = 0.002, I<sup>2</sup> = 82%, 7.70% baseline HbA1c). Short half-life inhibitors had insignificant mean difference of +0.08% ([-0.16, 0.33], p = 0.51, I<sup>2</sup> = 40%, 7.73% baseline HbA1c). In ≥8-week trials with participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and mean HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, long half-life inhibitors had significant mean decrease of -0.50% ([-0.83, -0.17], I<sup>2</sup> = 88%, p = 0.003); short half-life inhibitors had significant mean increase of +0.36% ([0.03, 0.68], I<sup>2</sup> = 3%, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>At the well-controlled HbA1c of the participants, previous literature shows current diabetes treatments have similar HbA1c decreases, so the HbA1c mean difference of long half-life PDE5 inhibitors may indeed be clinically relevant. This suggests future investigation into PDE5 inhibitors as part of combination therapy or as therapy for high HbA1c individuals is needed, especially because of variable risk of biases, homogeneity, and sample sizes in our study.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"80 ","pages":"103035"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, owing to their mechanism of action, have been gaining recognition as a potential case of drug repurposing and combination therapy for diabetes treatment. We aimed to examine the effect of long and short half-life PDE5 inhibitors have on Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people with elevated HbA1c (>6%) to assess mean difference in HbA1c levels from baseline versus controls after any PDE5 inhibitor intervention of ≥4 weeks, excluding multiple interventions. Cochrane CENTRAL, PMC Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP were searched without language restrictions up to September 30, 2024. Summary data from published data were extracted. PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines used to extract and assess data using a random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with the Research Registry, reviewregistry1733.

Findings: Among 1096 studies identified, in analysis of 13 studies with 1083 baseline patients, long half-life PDE5 inhibitors (tadalafil, PF-00489791) had decreases in HbA1c while short half-life PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, avanafil) had no change. Five (38.5%) studies had a low risk of bias, and eight (61.5%) had some concerns. Long half-life inhibitors had significant mean decrease of -0.40% ([-0.66, -0.14], p = 0.002, I2 = 82%, 7.70% baseline HbA1c). Short half-life inhibitors had insignificant mean difference of +0.08% ([-0.16, 0.33], p = 0.51, I2 = 40%, 7.73% baseline HbA1c). In ≥8-week trials with participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and mean HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, long half-life inhibitors had significant mean decrease of -0.50% ([-0.83, -0.17], I2 = 88%, p = 0.003); short half-life inhibitors had significant mean increase of +0.36% ([0.03, 0.68], I2 = 3%, p = 0.03).

Interpretation: At the well-controlled HbA1c of the participants, previous literature shows current diabetes treatments have similar HbA1c decreases, so the HbA1c mean difference of long half-life PDE5 inhibitors may indeed be clinically relevant. This suggests future investigation into PDE5 inhibitors as part of combination therapy or as therapy for high HbA1c individuals is needed, especially because of variable risk of biases, homogeneity, and sample sizes in our study.

Funding: None.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum for "Development of a machine learning-based model to predict hepatic inflammation in chronic hepatitis B patients with concurrent hepatic steatosis: a cohort study". Implementing a nurse-enabled, integrated, shared-care model involving specialists and general practitioners in early breast cancer post-treatment follow-up (EMINENT): a single-centre, open-label, phase 2, parallel-group, pilot, randomised, controlled trial. Status of cerebrovascular autoregulation relates to outcome in severe paediatric head injury: STARSHIP, a prospective multicentre validation study. Occult hepatitis B virus infection: risk for a blood supply, but how about individuals' health? Risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection following use of fluoroquinolones: a retrospective multinational network cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1