Implementing a nurse-enabled, integrated, shared-care model involving specialists and general practitioners in early breast cancer post-treatment follow-up (EMINENT): a single-centre, open-label, phase 2, parallel-group, pilot, randomised, controlled trial.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103090
Raymond J Chan, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Chad Yixian Han, Lee Jones, Alexandre Chan, Daniel McKavanagh, Marissa Ryan, Christine Carrington, Rebecca L Packer, Megan Crichton, Nicolas H Hart, Emma McKinnell, Melissa Gosper, Juanita Ryan, Bethany Crowe, Ria Joseph, Carolyn Ee, Jane Lee, Steven M McPhail, Katharine Cuff, Laisa Teleni, Jon Emery
{"title":"Implementing a nurse-enabled, integrated, shared-care model involving specialists and general practitioners in early breast cancer post-treatment follow-up (EMINENT): a single-centre, open-label, phase 2, parallel-group, pilot, randomised, controlled trial.","authors":"Raymond J Chan, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Chad Yixian Han, Lee Jones, Alexandre Chan, Daniel McKavanagh, Marissa Ryan, Christine Carrington, Rebecca L Packer, Megan Crichton, Nicolas H Hart, Emma McKinnell, Melissa Gosper, Juanita Ryan, Bethany Crowe, Ria Joseph, Carolyn Ee, Jane Lee, Steven M McPhail, Katharine Cuff, Laisa Teleni, Jon Emery","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current models of post-treatment cancer care rely heavily on hospital-based, medical specialists and do not sufficiently leverage primary care. Many breast cancer survivors face ongoing unmet needs that may benefit from a multidisciplinary, shared-care approach. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of implementing nurse-enabled, shared-follow-up care between the acute and primary care setting for early-stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre, open-label, phase II, pilot, randomised, controlled trial, individuals diagnosed with breast cancer (Stage 0-III) were randomised 1:1 to either usual care or intervention, which includes a 1) Specialist Nurse Consultation to co-develop a survivorship care plan (SCP), 2) Pharmacist Consultation, 3) Case Conference with General Practitioner (GP), and 4) shared follow-up care arrangements. Feasibility and effectiveness outcome measures, including health-related quality of life (primary outcome), physical activity and nutrition, patient experience, and financial toxicity were collected at baseline, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months, with health service utilisation data at 24-months. Bivariate and multivariable, intention-to-treat analyses were conducted. This trial is registered at Anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12619001594112).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From 3rd December 2019 to 13th April 2021, 61 participants were randomised (intervention n = 29; usual care n = 32); mean age 62.9 standard deviation (SD) = 10.9 years. The intervention was feasible with 100% completion rates across all elements of the specialist nurse consultation and GP case conference. Evaluation of the 28 SCPs indicated the top three goals were exercise (n = 23), diet (n = 12) and mental well-being (n = 11). All care goals can be supported by GPs. No differences were observed between groups for health-related quality of life and the other effectiveness outcomes measures listed above at all timepoints (P > 0.05 for all). There were significantly fewer average post-treatment radiation oncology appointments per patient in the intervention group compared to the control group (0.69 versus 1.27, P = 0.013) at 24-months. Number of unplanned hospital presentations at 24-months were low across both intervention (n = 7) and control (n = 4) groups.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Nurse-enabled, shared-care arrangements for women with early-stage breast cancer is feasible, and is as safe as specialist-led model of care. It may provide a more sustainable model of care in a longer term. GPs can meet the survivorship care needs identified breast cancer survivors. This trial can inform a large, pragmatic, hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Metro South Health Research Support Scheme Project Grant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103090"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current models of post-treatment cancer care rely heavily on hospital-based, medical specialists and do not sufficiently leverage primary care. Many breast cancer survivors face ongoing unmet needs that may benefit from a multidisciplinary, shared-care approach. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of implementing nurse-enabled, shared-follow-up care between the acute and primary care setting for early-stage breast cancer.

Methods: In this single-centre, open-label, phase II, pilot, randomised, controlled trial, individuals diagnosed with breast cancer (Stage 0-III) were randomised 1:1 to either usual care or intervention, which includes a 1) Specialist Nurse Consultation to co-develop a survivorship care plan (SCP), 2) Pharmacist Consultation, 3) Case Conference with General Practitioner (GP), and 4) shared follow-up care arrangements. Feasibility and effectiveness outcome measures, including health-related quality of life (primary outcome), physical activity and nutrition, patient experience, and financial toxicity were collected at baseline, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months, with health service utilisation data at 24-months. Bivariate and multivariable, intention-to-treat analyses were conducted. This trial is registered at Anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12619001594112).

Findings: From 3rd December 2019 to 13th April 2021, 61 participants were randomised (intervention n = 29; usual care n = 32); mean age 62.9 standard deviation (SD) = 10.9 years. The intervention was feasible with 100% completion rates across all elements of the specialist nurse consultation and GP case conference. Evaluation of the 28 SCPs indicated the top three goals were exercise (n = 23), diet (n = 12) and mental well-being (n = 11). All care goals can be supported by GPs. No differences were observed between groups for health-related quality of life and the other effectiveness outcomes measures listed above at all timepoints (P > 0.05 for all). There were significantly fewer average post-treatment radiation oncology appointments per patient in the intervention group compared to the control group (0.69 versus 1.27, P = 0.013) at 24-months. Number of unplanned hospital presentations at 24-months were low across both intervention (n = 7) and control (n = 4) groups.

Interpretation: Nurse-enabled, shared-care arrangements for women with early-stage breast cancer is feasible, and is as safe as specialist-led model of care. It may provide a more sustainable model of care in a longer term. GPs can meet the survivorship care needs identified breast cancer survivors. This trial can inform a large, pragmatic, hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Funding: Metro South Health Research Support Scheme Project Grant.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在早期乳腺癌治疗后随访(EMINENT)中实施由专科医生和全科医生参与的护士支持的综合共享护理模式:单中心、开放标签、2期、平行组、试点、随机对照试验。
背景:目前的癌症治疗后护理模式严重依赖以医院为基础的医学专家,没有充分利用初级保健。许多乳腺癌幸存者面临持续未满足的需求,这些需求可能受益于多学科共享护理方法。我们的目的是评估在急性和初级保健机构之间对早期乳腺癌实施护士支持的共享随访护理的可行性和初步效果。方法:在这个单中心、开放标签、II期、试点、随机对照试验中,被诊断为乳腺癌的个体(0-III期)被1:1随机分配到常规护理或干预组,其中包括1)专家护士会诊,共同制定幸存者护理计划(SCP), 2)药剂师会诊,3)与全科医生(GP)的病例会议,以及4)共享随访护理安排。可行性和有效性结果测量,包括与健康相关的生活质量(主要结果)、身体活动和营养、患者体验和财务毒性,在基线、3个月、6个月和12个月时收集,并在24个月时收集卫生服务利用数据。进行了双变量和多变量、意向治疗分析。该试验在Anzctr.org.au注册(ACTRN12619001594112)。研究结果:从2019年12月3日至2021年4月13日,61名参与者被随机分组(干预n = 29;常规护理n = 32);平均年龄62.9,标准差(SD) = 10.9岁。该干预措施是可行的,在专科护士会诊和全科医生病例会议的所有环节完成率为100%。对28名scp的评估表明,前三大目标是运动(n = 23)、饮食(n = 12)和心理健康(n = 11)。所有的护理目标都可以得到全科医生的支持。在所有时间点,与健康相关的生活质量和上述列出的其他有效性结局指标在两组之间均未观察到差异(P < 0.05)。24个月时,干预组每位患者治疗后的平均放射肿瘤学预约次数明显少于对照组(0.69 vs 1.27, P = 0.013)。在干预组(n = 7)和对照组(n = 4)中,24个月时计划外住院的次数都很低。解释:对早期乳腺癌患者进行护士支持的共享护理安排是可行的,并且与专家主导的护理模式一样安全。从长远来看,它可能提供一种更可持续的护理模式。全科医生可以满足乳腺癌幸存者的生存护理需求。该试验可以为大规模、务实、混合有效性实施试验提供信息。资助:南方地铁卫生研究支持计划项目资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
The prevalence and role of human respiratory syncytial virus in pediatric respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global data. Predictors of response to compression therapy in breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digital patient experience tools in multiple sclerosis: a landscape analysis of the global Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis (PROMS) initiative. Excess mortality from cirrhosis by neighbourhood deprivation, aetiology, and clinical presentation: a Swedish register-based cohort study. Variation in diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) by cutoffs used in screening programs globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1