Structural Determinants of School Discipline: Examining State-Level Racial Bias and Neighborhood Opportunity

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.017
Erin L. Thompson PhD , Marybel R. Gonzalez PhD , Kristin M. Scardamalia PhD , Andy V. Pham PhD , Ashley R. Adams MS , Angelica Gonzalez AA , Gabriella V. Rizzo Scarfone AS , Sarah M. Lehman MS , Christine M. Kaiver BA , Samuel W. Hawes PhD , Raul Gonzalez PhD
{"title":"Structural Determinants of School Discipline: Examining State-Level Racial Bias and Neighborhood Opportunity","authors":"Erin L. Thompson PhD ,&nbsp;Marybel R. Gonzalez PhD ,&nbsp;Kristin M. Scardamalia PhD ,&nbsp;Andy V. Pham PhD ,&nbsp;Ashley R. Adams MS ,&nbsp;Angelica Gonzalez AA ,&nbsp;Gabriella V. Rizzo Scarfone AS ,&nbsp;Sarah M. Lehman MS ,&nbsp;Christine M. Kaiver BA ,&nbsp;Samuel W. Hawes PhD ,&nbsp;Raul Gonzalez PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Addressing the disproportionate use of school detentions and suspensions among Black youth is crucial for reducing educational and health disparities<span> across the life span. Yet, few studies have explored external factors beyond school or individual characteristics as potential contributors to school discipline disparities, such as state-level racial bias and neighborhood opportunity.</span></div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div><span>A subsample from the larger Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study was used (n = 8,668; mean age at baseline = 9.5 years; 71% White; 29% Black). Anti-Black racial bias was measured using state-level indicators of racial prejudicial attitudes. Neighborhood opportunity was measured using census tract indicators within the education, health care, and social/economic domains. </span>Logistic regression was used to examine risk of receiving a detention/suspension by the fourth wave of the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Black youth had significantly higher detention/suspension rates than White youth, which could not be explained by teacher- or caregiver-reported externalizing concerns or by family characteristics. Social/economic indicators of neighborhood opportunity moderated the association between state-level racial bias and school discipline among Black youth, but not among White youth. Black youth living in states with greater racial bias were at higher risk for receiving school discipline when living in neighborhoods with more social/economic opportunities. In contrast, Black youth were at high risk for school discipline when living in neighborhoods with the lowest levels of opportunity regardless of state-level racial bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Place-based characteristics appear to play a key role in explaining the inequitable use of school discipline among Black youth compared with White youth.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This study used data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study to explore why Black youth face higher rates of school discipline compared to White youth. Using data from 8,668 ABCD participants, the authors found that Black youth living in neighborhoods with more economic opportunities were more likely to be disciplined if they lived in states with higher racial bias. In contrast, Black youth living in neighborhoods with fewer opportunities faced high rates of discipline regardless of state racial bias. These findings suggest that both state and neighborhood factors, which are outside of a child’s control, contribute to racial disparities in school discipline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"64 11","pages":"Pages 1305-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856725000152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Addressing the disproportionate use of school detentions and suspensions among Black youth is crucial for reducing educational and health disparities across the life span. Yet, few studies have explored external factors beyond school or individual characteristics as potential contributors to school discipline disparities, such as state-level racial bias and neighborhood opportunity.

Method

A subsample from the larger Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study was used (n = 8,668; mean age at baseline = 9.5 years; 71% White; 29% Black). Anti-Black racial bias was measured using state-level indicators of racial prejudicial attitudes. Neighborhood opportunity was measured using census tract indicators within the education, health care, and social/economic domains. Logistic regression was used to examine risk of receiving a detention/suspension by the fourth wave of the study.

Results

Black youth had significantly higher detention/suspension rates than White youth, which could not be explained by teacher- or caregiver-reported externalizing concerns or by family characteristics. Social/economic indicators of neighborhood opportunity moderated the association between state-level racial bias and school discipline among Black youth, but not among White youth. Black youth living in states with greater racial bias were at higher risk for receiving school discipline when living in neighborhoods with more social/economic opportunities. In contrast, Black youth were at high risk for school discipline when living in neighborhoods with the lowest levels of opportunity regardless of state-level racial bias.

Conclusion

Place-based characteristics appear to play a key role in explaining the inequitable use of school discipline among Black youth compared with White youth.

Plain language summary

This study used data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study to explore why Black youth face higher rates of school discipline compared to White youth. Using data from 8,668 ABCD participants, the authors found that Black youth living in neighborhoods with more economic opportunities were more likely to be disciplined if they lived in states with higher racial bias. In contrast, Black youth living in neighborhoods with fewer opportunities faced high rates of discipline regardless of state racial bias. These findings suggest that both state and neighborhood factors, which are outside of a child’s control, contribute to racial disparities in school discipline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校纪律的结构性决定因素:考察州一级的种族偏见和邻里机会。
目标:解决黑人青年过度使用学校拘留和休学的问题对于减少整个生命周期的教育和健康差距至关重要。然而,很少有研究探索学校或个人特征以外的外部因素作为学校纪律差异的潜在因素,如州一级的种族偏见和邻里机会。方法:使用来自较大的青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究®的子样本(M年龄基线= 9.5;N = 8,668;71%的白人;29%的黑人)。反黑人种族偏见是用州一级的种族偏见态度指标来衡量的。使用教育、医疗保健和社会/经济领域的人口普查区指标来衡量邻里机会。在研究的第四阶段,我们使用逻辑回归来检查接受留校/停职的风险。结果:黑人青年的拘留/停学率明显高于白人青年,这不能用教师或照顾者报告的外化问题或家庭特征来解释。正如假设的那样,社区机会的社会/经济指标在黑人青年中调节了州一级种族偏见和学校纪律之间的联系,而在白人青年中则没有。生活在种族偏见更严重的州的黑人青年受到学校纪律的风险更高,而生活在社会/经济机会更多的社区的黑人青年受到学校纪律的风险更高。相比之下,无论州一级的种族偏见如何,黑人青年生活在机会水平最低的社区时,受到学校纪律处分的风险很高。结论:基于地点的特征似乎在解释黑人青年与白人青年相比不公平使用学校纪律方面发挥了关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
期刊最新文献
Perceived Racism, Brain Development, and Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms: Findings From the ABCD Study Prenatal Adversity and Neonatal Brain Connectivity Relate to Emerging Executive Function at Age 2 Years Enduring Mental Health in Childhood and Adolescence: Prevalence, Prediction, and Genetic Architecture Exploring the Behavioral and Emotional Manifestation of Polygenic Risk for Psychiatric Disorders Among Schoolchildren Systematic Review: The Psychosocial Impacts of Autism-Related Genetic Testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1