Falguni S. Thakar , Kiran Vasava , Snehal Bagtharia , Amit Kanani , Vartika Chandra , Beena Patel , Dipeeka K. Mandaliya
{"title":"Veterinarians approach towards antimicrobial stewardship and one health: A survey study","authors":"Falguni S. Thakar , Kiran Vasava , Snehal Bagtharia , Amit Kanani , Vartika Chandra , Beena Patel , Dipeeka K. Mandaliya","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the top 10 global public health threats. One Health approach is needed to tackle antimicrobial resistance as most antimicrobials used in animals are also used in humans and affect the environment. Although the knowledge and attitudes of personnel in the human healthcare sector are studied more frequently in Gujarat, veterinarians' approaches also play a pivotal role in attaining antimicrobial stewardship. Thus, an online survey was conducted to understand the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of veterinarians regarding AMR and antimicrobial stewardship in Gujarat. A total of 691 respondents included 300 government veterinarians (44 %), 258 cooperative veterinarians (37 %), 45 private veterinarians (5 %), 69 MVD GVK veterinarians (10 %), and 19 others (4 %). Several veterinarians (77 %) believe that farmers' misuse of antimicrobials contributes significantly to AMR. According to 78 % of respondents, the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals contributes to AMR, which can be reduced by vaccines, biosecurity measures, and hygiene (79 %). As per 86 % of the responders, antimicrobial stewardship is important, and 81 % educate farmers on the rational use of antimicrobials. Though 92 % of veterinarians agreed that culture and antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AST) should be done as frequently as possible to guide antimicrobial usage, only 4 % always, and 68 % sometimes send samples for AST. However, 31 % think it is acceptable to commence antimicrobial therapy without a confirmatory diagnosis. The study findings suggest that AMR awareness among farmers, increased provision of laboratory services, and AST at affordable costs should be developed to combat the development of AMR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 105546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825000207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the top 10 global public health threats. One Health approach is needed to tackle antimicrobial resistance as most antimicrobials used in animals are also used in humans and affect the environment. Although the knowledge and attitudes of personnel in the human healthcare sector are studied more frequently in Gujarat, veterinarians' approaches also play a pivotal role in attaining antimicrobial stewardship. Thus, an online survey was conducted to understand the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of veterinarians regarding AMR and antimicrobial stewardship in Gujarat. A total of 691 respondents included 300 government veterinarians (44 %), 258 cooperative veterinarians (37 %), 45 private veterinarians (5 %), 69 MVD GVK veterinarians (10 %), and 19 others (4 %). Several veterinarians (77 %) believe that farmers' misuse of antimicrobials contributes significantly to AMR. According to 78 % of respondents, the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals contributes to AMR, which can be reduced by vaccines, biosecurity measures, and hygiene (79 %). As per 86 % of the responders, antimicrobial stewardship is important, and 81 % educate farmers on the rational use of antimicrobials. Though 92 % of veterinarians agreed that culture and antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AST) should be done as frequently as possible to guide antimicrobial usage, only 4 % always, and 68 % sometimes send samples for AST. However, 31 % think it is acceptable to commence antimicrobial therapy without a confirmatory diagnosis. The study findings suggest that AMR awareness among farmers, increased provision of laboratory services, and AST at affordable costs should be developed to combat the development of AMR.
Emma R Bollig, Elizabeth B Hirsch, Irene Bueno, Ruth Lynfield, Jennifer L Granick, Krista D Gens, Ayesha Rashid, Kelly Harris, Kimberly Boeser, Amanda L Beaudoin
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.